Humodour Posted November 27, 2011 Posted November 27, 2011 http://www.airspacemag.com/space-explorati...?c=y&page=1 I love you SpaceX.
Walsingham Posted November 27, 2011 Posted November 27, 2011 very interesting article, actually. Covers a llt of bases. Not sure I buy all their pitch points. But I can see where they're coming in from. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
Humodour Posted November 28, 2011 Author Posted November 28, 2011 They don't necessarily need to be the company that succeeds at their goals, just the one that starts a revolution in space travel. They may well fail as a business 20 years from now but leave a permanent positive impact on humanity with their methods. I think the world is definitely just a little bit of a better place because they exist.
Cantousent Posted November 28, 2011 Posted November 28, 2011 You know, I don't think that we could build a single spaceship, let alone a fleet of spaceships, that we could send out with any degree of real certainty to reach an inhabitable planet (that we have hitherto not found), but I do think this is a good thing. There was a time and place for government involvement in the space program. Even a free market guy like myself sees that sometimes the government can do things the private sector cannot, such as accomplishing our first landings on the moon or defeating nazi Germany. ...But I know that making it so that space travel becomes a way for private investors to make money while engaging the public is a huge step to developing substantial possibilities for longer travel distances and larger projects. You know, I dream of space also. I can be a pragmatist, and sometimes that makes it seem like I don't want the same thing, but I want to see humanity spread to other planets in our solar system and beyond. It is not preordained, but it can happen, and what a wonderful thing it would be, a Christian on Mars fighting with an Atheist on some remote planet lightyears away. One would be closer to God and one would be closer to science and both would be closer to each other than a caveman in Europe and one in Asia could have ever imagined. Fionavar's Holliday Wishes to all members of our online community: Happy Holidays Join the revelry at the Obsidian Plays channel:Obsidian Plays Remembering tarna, Phosphor, Metadigital, and Visceris. Drink mead heartily in the halls of Valhalla, my friends!
Gorth Posted November 28, 2011 Posted November 28, 2011 Even a free market guy like myself sees that sometimes the government can do things the private sector cannot, such as accomplishing our first landings on the moon or defeating nazi Germany. ...But I know that making it so that space travel becomes a way for private investors to make money while engaging the public is a huge step to developing substantial possibilities for longer travel distances and larger projects. It took Isabella of Spain (i.e. "the state") to finance Columbus' journey across the Atlantic with nothing but the *potential* of riches as incentive. Today people travel across the Atlantic as if it was just a minor inconvenience, relying on commercial carriers. Different scales, similar mechanisms “He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein
Walsingham Posted November 28, 2011 Posted November 28, 2011 Really what space travel needs is some fierce competition. First habitable colony on Mars gets the continent sized land round it. That sort of thing. As in so many situations, claiming the fruits have to be shared by all means no bastard wants to go to the trouble of picking them. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
Gfted1 Posted November 28, 2011 Posted November 28, 2011 What space travel really needs is a quantum leap in engine technology. Otherwise everything is too far and too expensive. Sure, go build a dome on Mars. WooHoo, then what? "I'm your biggest fan, Ill follow you until you love me, Papa"
Gorgon Posted November 28, 2011 Posted November 28, 2011 Or something able to survive the journey and the solar radiation exposure. I'm thinking robots., that's going to be viable before Ion drive engines. Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
Walsingham Posted November 29, 2011 Posted November 29, 2011 What space travel really needs is a quantum leap in engine technology. Otherwise everything is too far and too expensive. Sure, go build a dome on Mars. WooHoo, then what? I follow your reasoning. However I'd suggest three alternatives: 1) If the transition can be made less arduous, so maybe a larger space ship to do the journey in. Now I think about it, surely it could be really helpful to have a space station in orbit? 2) If we could deliver some locally necessary effects from earth or Earth orbit, that might lighten the load. 3) Some means of braking quicker. My understanding is that a lot of travel time is due to the necessity of slowing down over a long period. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
Raithe Posted November 29, 2011 Posted November 29, 2011 The key expense at the moment, is boosting out of the gravity well. If/when we get a station in orbit and potentially a moonbase, once some minding/manufacturing in place it becomes a lot simpler to establish further solar system exploration and travels. "Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum."
Gorgon Posted November 29, 2011 Posted November 29, 2011 Probes cn travel almost indefinitely under their own momentum if they are programmed to slingshot around the orbits of planets. Now imagine thousands of self contained explorer probe-bots able to traverse the atmosphere of planets. Using any nearby probes to relay data back to earth. We need somewhere really interesting to go before attempting a manned mission. Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
Rosbjerg Posted November 29, 2011 Posted November 29, 2011 Elevator to a orbiting station and then solarpowered slingshots in space.. Saves on fuel. Fortune favors the bald.
Walsingham Posted November 29, 2011 Posted November 29, 2011 Probes cn travel almost indefinitely under their own momentum if they are programmed to slingshot around the orbits of planets. Now imagine thousands of self contained explorer probe-bots able to traverse the atmosphere of planets. Using any nearby probes to relay data back to earth. We need somewhere really interesting to go before attempting a manned mission. But we can learn in the mean time. Personally I'd rather settle an empty planet than be fending off all the greenish xenophiles who would object if we tried to settle somewhere bearing life. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
Bos_hybrid Posted December 6, 2011 Posted December 6, 2011 It will only happen if there was money in it. Like that diamond world.
Flouride Posted December 10, 2011 Posted December 10, 2011 It will only happen if there was money in it. Like that diamond world. Or a couple of asteroids filled with minerals. Anyways great article. Hate the living, love the dead.
Walsingham Posted December 10, 2011 Posted December 10, 2011 They'd have to be bloody special minerals to be worth the effort. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
Flouride Posted December 10, 2011 Posted December 10, 2011 They'd have to be bloody special minerals to be worth the effort. I would imagine that by the time we actually have the technology to actually accomplish that, the prices for various resources would actually make it economically viable. Hate the living, love the dead.
Humodour Posted December 10, 2011 Author Posted December 10, 2011 Speaking of SpaceX and commercialisation... how about supplying the International Space Station? http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-12-nasa-o...vate-space.html
Walsingham Posted December 10, 2011 Posted December 10, 2011 They'd have to be bloody special minerals to be worth the effort. I would imagine that by the time we actually have the technology to actually accomplish that, the prices for various resources would actually make it economically viable. Hangover fuzzed thought: Will commercial appetite exist for all the electronic trinkets we currenty enjoy? If so, might such demand not be met by adapting biological organisms? "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
Humodour Posted December 10, 2011 Author Posted December 10, 2011 They'd have to be bloody special minerals to be worth the effort. I would imagine that by the time we actually have the technology to actually accomplish that, the prices for various resources would actually make it economically viable. Hangover fuzzed thought: Will commercial appetite exist for all the electronic trinkets we currenty enjoy? If so, might such demand not be met by adapting biological organisms? I'm not sure where you're going with that, but personally speaking, biomimetics has been a personal obsession of mine since I was a teenager, and it has a very special place in materials science, so I would say yes. I mean, we're only just now discovering that photosynthesis involves quantum effects. Nature has a lot to teach us. Can't see biological spaceships in the near future, though... save non-biological computers based off biological circuits and network.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now