213374U Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 The questionable applications part of the iPhone, I would suspect not.Hehe. Why is porn "questionable"? - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.
Deadly_Nightshade Posted April 22, 2010 Posted April 22, 2010 (edited) Why is porn "questionable"? In his mind it seems to be questionable. Frankly I think Apple should set up an adult section of their store and be done with it but that's likely not going to happen (iirc there used to be one and then it got shut down - but I might be wrong as I really don't keep up with the app store as I don't have a device that uses Apple applications). Edited April 22, 2010 by Deadly_Nightshade "Geez. It's like we lost some sort of bet and ended up saddled with a bunch of terrible new posters on this forum." -Hurlshot
Orogun01 Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 Which is exactly my point, the Iphone is mostly used in public. You've realised of course that you will necessarily only see them using it in public. I have an Iphone, I know people that own Iphones. Never seen them use an Iphone in their house and we are tight. Plus using your Iphone to watch porn on your own house instead of a computer or tv is just dumb. BTW, @everyone: "Mobile phones" where made to carry into public places, my case is well founded. I'd say the answer to that question is kind of like the answer to "who's the sucker in this poker game?"* *If you can't tell, it's you.
Volourn Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 No. DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.
Killian Kalthorne Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 If people want porn on their mobile I say more power to them. If people want to make porn with their mobile I say they better share with the appropriate people. "Your Job is not to die for your country, but set a man on fire, and take great comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the universe."
Hurlshort Posted April 23, 2010 Posted April 23, 2010 My 3G connection on my phone is actually better than my internet connection on my home PC.
Meshugger Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 Which is exactly my point, the Iphone is mostly used in public. You've realised of course that you will necessarily only see them using it in public. I have an Iphone, I know people that own Iphones. Never seen them use an Iphone in their house and we are tight. Plus using your Iphone to watch porn on your own house instead of a computer or tv is just dumb. BTW, @everyone: "Mobile phones" where made to carry into public places, my case is well founded. Ideas such as yours are what i call cancer to society, slowly destroying everything that's good in this world. "Some men see things as they are and say why?""I dream things that never were and say why not?"- George Bernard Shaw"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."- Friedrich Nietzsche "The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it." - Some guy
Orogun01 Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 You people sicken me I'd say the answer to that question is kind of like the answer to "who's the sucker in this poker game?"* *If you can't tell, it's you.
kirottu Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 You people sicken me I hope you learned something today. Internet people will protect pr0n against all and everyone. This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Gorgon Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
mkreku Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 You people sicken me Yes, so sickening how people don't want a single company deciding what's good for you or not! SICKENING Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
Kaftan Barlast Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 Not to mention he wants to take the bread right out of the mouth of the world hard-working porn stars. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Walsingham Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 Not to mention he wants to take the bread right out of the mouth of the world hard-working porn stars. Surely a hard working porn star wouldn't want bread in their mouth. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
Kaftan Barlast Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 I take it you havent seen 'Loaf gaggers' or 'Whole wheat whore' yet. DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "
Deadly_Nightshade Posted April 24, 2010 Posted April 24, 2010 You people sicken me Why? "Geez. It's like we lost some sort of bet and ended up saddled with a bunch of terrible new posters on this forum." -Hurlshot
Orogun01 Posted April 25, 2010 Posted April 25, 2010 You people sicken me Why? Nothing personal, I just don't think somethings are worth defending. Btw people, what kind of porn are you defending? Playboy centerfold, look at those knockers porn. Or tranny gags and ties a donkey and sodomizes it porn? I'd say the answer to that question is kind of like the answer to "who's the sucker in this poker game?"* *If you can't tell, it's you.
Volourn Posted April 25, 2010 Posted April 25, 2010 Doesn't matter. Barring pron that shows actual heinous like actual real rape (instead of actors doing it) & sex with minors (immoral and illegal), ALL pron should be there to be enjoyed by those who enjoy it and ignored by those who don't care for it. Much like any other form of entertainment. I don't care for MMA, and I think it's a rather barbaric sport but if people want to watch it and participate in it, more power to 'em. DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.
Orogun01 Posted April 25, 2010 Posted April 25, 2010 (edited) Doesn't matter. Barring pron that shows actual heinous like actual real rape (instead of actors doing it) & sex with minors (immoral and illegal), ALL pron should be there to be enjoyed by those who enjoy it and ignored by those who don't care for it. Much like any other form of entertainment. I don't care for MMA, and I think it's a rather barbaric sport but if people want to watch it and participate in it, more power to 'em. Ohhh, but what about pedophiles and raptophiles? Don't they deserve to enjoy their porn too? Even Google comes with filters and avoids most porn sites unless you specifically ask for them. A person could completely avoid them and live in bliss, but go out to the street and see some teenager jerk watching boobies on his Iphone. Should the sensibilities of those who are not interested or are repulsed by porn be transgressed just so people can watch porn in places they shouldn't be watching porn? Moreover that would be public indecency and a legal suit in the making. So yeah, I dare anyone to watch porn in front of me. I'll sue the floor from under you and use the money to enact whatever you were watching. I mean whatever Edited April 25, 2010 by Orogun01 I'd say the answer to that question is kind of like the answer to "who's the sucker in this poker game?"* *If you can't tell, it's you.
Walsingham Posted April 25, 2010 Posted April 25, 2010 Um... we have a major national newspaper The Sun (Murdoch owned) which has had boobies on page 3 for decades. You see copies all over the place as with most newspapers. We also have magazines like Nuts and Bizarre which have all kinds of weirdness in them. Yet in all my years travelling on public transport I've only noticed one man reading them in a careless fashion which might inadvertantly expose others. And that was on a massively overcrowded train, hence arguably not his fault. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
213374U Posted April 25, 2010 Posted April 25, 2010 Should the sensibilities of those who are not interested or are repulsed by porn be transgressed just so people can watch porn in places they shouldn't be watching porn?Yeah, that. I never cease to be amazed at how people's sensibilities can be hurt by basic physiological functions. I mean, stop eating that sandwich, you're offending me! In other words, yes, they should. Grow a thicker skin/mind your own business etc. Moreover that would be public indecency and a legal suit in the making. So yeah, I dare anyone to watch porn in front of me. I'll sue the floor from under you and use the money to enact whatever you were watching. I mean whatever America, F*** yeah! - When he is best, he is a little worse than a man, and when he is worst, he is little better than a beast.
Deadly_Nightshade Posted April 25, 2010 Posted April 25, 2010 So yeah, I dare anyone to watch porn in front of me. I'll sue the floor from under you and use the money to enact whatever you were watching. I mean whatever Wow... Again, you have completely missed the point. I don;' think anyone here is saying that a person has the right to shove porn in your face but if someone is watching porn on their PSP/phone/iPod/netbook and you purposely look at their screen then you, and not the watcher, are the one at fault. Frankly, as you mentioned, there are already public decency laws in most countries and so I fail to see why you're, again, making such a big deal about the hypothetical porn-on-a-phone scenario as it would be covered under those if the person was really being that disruptive. But, hey, maybe you're just more intune with what people do on their phones than I am (I've never been that interested in other people's phones). "Geez. It's like we lost some sort of bet and ended up saddled with a bunch of terrible new posters on this forum." -Hurlshot
Deadly_Nightshade Posted April 25, 2010 Posted April 25, 2010 Btw people, what kind of porn are you defending? Well, at least in my case, it's not the porn per se but more the censorship. "Geez. It's like we lost some sort of bet and ended up saddled with a bunch of terrible new posters on this forum." -Hurlshot
Meshugger Posted April 25, 2010 Posted April 25, 2010 So yeah, I dare anyone to watch porn in front of me. I'll sue the floor from under you and use the money to enact whatever you were watching. I mean whatever Haha, oh my. My bad for falling for your trolling. "Some men see things as they are and say why?""I dream things that never were and say why not?"- George Bernard Shaw"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."- Friedrich Nietzsche "The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it." - Some guy
Walsingham Posted April 25, 2010 Posted April 25, 2010 I have to agree that someone who can't keep their eyes off another man's phone is probably not English, and ought therefore to be more reticent about exposing that fact by objecting to the phone's display. Purely from a sense of personal inadequacy. "It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"." -Elwood Blues tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.
Hurlshort Posted April 25, 2010 Posted April 25, 2010 Even Google comes with filters and avoids most porn sites unless you specifically ask for them. A person could completely avoid them and live in bliss, but go out to the street and see some teenager jerk watching boobies on his Iphone. Should the sensibilities of those who are not interested or are repulsed by porn be transgressed just so people can watch porn in places they shouldn't be watching porn? Moreover that would be public indecency and a legal suit in the making. So yeah, I dare anyone to watch porn in front of me. I'll sue the floor from under you and use the money to enact whatever you were watching. I mean whatever It is completely within your rights to sue any moron who goes out of their way to show porn in public. That is not what the argument here is about. That moron can show porn on his laptop, a portable DVD player, whatever, and yet those devices are not being censored.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now