French politicians a bunch of whiny islamophobic babies.

France: New Anti-Capitalist Party defends democratic right to wear hijab

NPA candidate Ilham Moussa

"A 1998 survey"

 

A 1998 SURVEY

"A 1998 survey"

 

A 1998 SURVEY

In just a few years, France has suddenly stopped being racist, despite not doing anything special.

 

In 2002, seventeen percent of the population voted for an openly racist candidate. Than means that for every twenty people you pass on the street, three of them are unabashed racists.

Edited February 20, 201015 yr by lord of flies

Good to see that there's at least some countries left in Europe that aren't as quick to jump on the internationalist-multicultural PC bandwagon.

 

Oh, wait. Did you say France?

 

Crap.

*watches

*watches

 

You forgot an asteriskskskss on the end. It makes you look like you're correcting a typo as is.

There has never have been a true multicultural society. Even the US, which has no official language and is completely secular, is predominantly Anglo-saxon. Litterature, music, laws, langauge, holidays, everything. The rest of the cultures are there as a flavour.

 

Hijabs will always be considered non-french. At least within this generation or two.

There has never have been a true multicultural society. Even the US, which has no official language and is completely secular, is predominantly Anglo-saxon. Litterature, music, laws, langauge, holidays, everything. The rest of the cultures are there as a flavour.

 

By about 2040, the US will be majority Hispanic.

 

Which I guess is still European but it's not Anglo-Saxon!

And in other news, in india muslim women caan chose to wear a sari and a veil instead of the hijab. Pretty sexy if you ask me.

 

Even the hijab comes in other colours than extremist black. This is the white wedding version.

 

And in other news, in india muslim women caan chose to wear a sari and a veil instead of the hijab. Pretty sexy if you ask me.

 

 

In India, Muslim women can choose not to wear either of the damn things. They are cultural things (mostly Arab), not religious.

Edited February 20, 201015 yr by Krezack

Pretty hot for muslim attire anyways.

It mostly looks like a really really fancy dress.

Must be unpractical, dragging around that carpet.

And in other news, in india muslim women caan chose to wear a sari and a veil instead of the hijab. Pretty sexy if you ask me.

You're why women wear the hijab.

 

By the way, Ilham Moussaid, the woman in the article, wears a white hijab.

She should be wearing something that covers her entire face.. R00fles!

Edited February 20, 201015 yr by Volourn

*sigh* the french are right

 

I hate to have to agree with the french. Although much more than that will be necessary to stop Islam.

Edited February 20, 201015 yr by RPGmasterBoo

There has never have been a true multicultural society. Even the US, which has no official language and is completely secular, is predominantly Anglo-saxon. Litterature, music, laws, langauge, holidays, everything. The rest of the cultures are there as a flavour.

 

By about 2040, the US will be majority Hispanic.

 

Which I guess is still European but it's not Anglo-Saxon!

 

Or have they by then been completely assimilated by then, just as the irish and the italians before them? Time will tell

*sigh* the french are right

 

I hate to have to agree with the french. Although much more than that will be necessary to stop Islam.

"Stopping Islam" is a childish mantra of people who don't understand how things like "social class," "political regressivism" and "religion" intersect. French Catholics whining about French Muslims is even more idiotic than atheists who attack literally every Christian.

 

The woman is a member of a radical anti-capitalist party, she just happens to be a Muslim. Why is it so necessary to "stop" the second largest religion in the world?

Lets see here, maybe because Islam is seen as a violent blood crazed religion that treats women as property and wants to take over governments by making them into theocracies. Right or wrong, that is the image it has in many areas in Europe and the US and the extremists and Iran have done little to change that image.

Those groups probably should do something about it because the ignorance is getting a bit old.

Lets see here, maybe because Islam is seen as a violent blood crazed religion that treats women as property and wants to take over governments by making them into theocracies. Right or wrong, that is the image it has in many areas in Europe and the US and the extremists and Iran have done little to change that image.

Yes, but it actually isn't a "violent blood crazed religion that treats women as property and wants to take over governments by making them into theocracies," at least, no more than Christianity, so this is irrelevant posturing on your part.

Yes, but it actually isn't a "violent blood crazed religion that treats women as property and wants to take over governments by making them into theocracies," at least, no more than Christianity, so this is irrelevant posturing on your part.

 

LoF, you should know by now that it doesn't matter what an organization is, or what a product really does. It is all about public image and public relations, and how well something can be spinned so it can be accepted by the idiot masses. That is the image of Islam for many people and even the moderates have done very little to combat that perceived image.

 

Perception is reality even if that perception is wrong.

Edited February 21, 201015 yr by Sand

And in other news, in india muslim women caan chose to wear a sari and a veil instead of the hijab. Pretty sexy if you ask me.

You're why women wear the hijab.

 

By the way, Ilham Moussaid, the woman in the article, wears a white hijab.

I am teh filthy objectifier.

She should be wearing something that covers her entire face.. R00fles!

Hahaha. Owned by Volourn. How often does that happen?!