Moose Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I love our leftwing, bias newspapers here in the UK. This has to be one of the most openly agressive attacks on China I've seen from the media regarding the talks: Clicky There are none that are right, only strong of opinion. There are none that are wrong, only ignorant of facts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meshugger Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 Hoho, so China is flexing its muscles i see. They will never replace the american cultural hegemony though, unless they develop some better popular culture than sex, drugs, and rock n' roll. "Some men see things as they are and say why?""I dream things that never were and say why not?"- George Bernard Shaw"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."- Friedrich Nietzsche "The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it." - Some guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lare Kikkeli Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 (edited) I don't doubt for a second that China, India & the rest of the developing countries weren't behind the lackluster result of the conference. In the end only the EU was for cutting down CO2 emissions, the rest of the world wanted to keep their precious SUV's. Guess I can't blame China or India though, they're only catching up to the west and all of a sudden we say that we've used up all the pollution the world can handle. Edited December 23, 2009 by Lare Kikkeli Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrath of Dagon Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 All of a sudden I feel much better about our new evil overlords. "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightshape Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I'm sick of this "save the planet" bull. What they really mean is "save humanity", and frankly my only feeling on this topic is, f**k humanity, we deserve to die, we're a virus with shoe's and if we can't agree to stop being retarded then f**k us. I came up with Crate 3.0 technology. Crate 4.0 - we shall just have to wait and see.Down and out on the Solomani RimNow the Spinward Marches don't look so GRIM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purkake Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I'm sick of this "save the planet" bull. What they really mean is "save humanity", and frankly my only feeling on this topic is, f**k humanity, we deserve to die, we're a virus with shoe's and if we can't agree to stop being retarded then f**k us. Why not start with yourself? Having to share a planet with all these countries sucks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moose Posted December 23, 2009 Author Share Posted December 23, 2009 I'd agree with you, but for all we know we might be the only intelligent species to ever exist throughout the cosmos, throughout all eternity. No matter how rubbish we are, we're still number 1 on a universal scale. There are none that are right, only strong of opinion. There are none that are wrong, only ignorant of facts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killian Kalthorne Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 That is why we need one nation for the whole goddamn planet and it needs to be Canadian. GO GO VOLOURN! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! "Your Job is not to die for your country, but set a man on fire, and take great comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the universe." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purkake Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 That is why we need one nation for the whole goddamn planet and it needs to be Canadian. GO GO VOLOURN! WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! We'll get one nation when we get interstellar travel and space colonies. Then all the crazy people can go and do what they want on their own planets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taks Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I don't doubt for a second that China, India & the rest of the developing countries weren't behind the lackluster result of the conference. yes and no. it was really only about money, and all the [sarc]poor, starving, damaged by CO2[/sarc] developing nations were simply asking for money. maybe because of the climategate scandal, or maybe just because it was so blatant, this was quite out in the open. developed countries were not going to be able to get their people to sign on to what was obvious as a transfer of wealth to countries that are by and large ruled by dictators. guess some of us are smart enough to realize that maybe the dictators are the problem, not the west's "pollution." In the end only the EU was for cutting down CO2 emissions lip service. the rest of the world wanted to keep their precious SUV's. Guess I can't blame China or India though, they're only catching up to the west and all of a sudden we say that we've used up all the pollution the world can handle. ding, ding, ding! and a lightbulb went on. "let's hold them all hostage while we build up OUR economies {and generate even more pollution than they did} then take over the world economy!" forest, trees. taks comrade taks... just because. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Humodour Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I love American conspiracy theorists. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killian Kalthorne Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 In the end we all know that it is Steve's fault. DAMN YOU STEVE! "Your Job is not to die for your country, but set a man on fire, and take great comfort in the general hostility and unfairness of the universe." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lare Kikkeli Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I don't doubt for a second that China, India & the rest of the developing countries weren't behind the lackluster result of the conference. yes and no. it was really only about money, and all the [sarc]poor, starving, damaged by CO2[/sarc] developing nations were simply asking for money. maybe because of the climategate scandal, or maybe just because it was so blatant, this was quite out in the open. developed countries were not going to be able to get their people to sign on to what was obvious as a transfer of wealth to countries that are by and large ruled by dictators. guess some of us are smart enough to realize that maybe the dictators are the problem, not the west's "pollution." In the end only the EU was for cutting down CO2 emissions lip service. the rest of the world wanted to keep their precious SUV's. Guess I can't blame China or India though, they're only catching up to the west and all of a sudden we say that we've used up all the pollution the world can handle. ding, ding, ding! and a lightbulb went on. "let's hold them all hostage while we build up OUR economies {and generate even more pollution than they did} then take over the world economy!" forest, trees. taks all i see is blah blah blah hands of my filthy lucre! free market! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaftan Barlast Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 (edited) There was never any hope for the summit to reach any kind of functional agreement in the first place. Countries like China have everything to gain on maintaining free CO2 emissions, and very much to lose economicly if they were forced to cut down on pollution. Naturally, they're not going to agree to anything that would halt their economic growth, even if it wrecks the planet. We've got a stalemate like the old Nato vs. Soviet that completely crippled the UN for 40 years. Kyoto had some very clever scheming behind the curtains which made it more succesful despite the US refusing to sign, but theres no tricking anyoe this time. Edited December 23, 2009 by Kaftan Barlast DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself. Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture. "I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taks Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 all i see is blah blah blah hands of my filthy lucre! free market! what? is it really that hard to post something sensible? oh, wait... you... of course. taks comrade taks... just because. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taks Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 Kyoto had some very clever scheming behind the curtains which made it more succesful despite the US refusing to sign uh, kyoto wasn't successful, at least, it has not accomplished what it set out to accomplish. even if the copenhagen summit were "successful," neither would it have really accomplished anything, either, other than funding 3rd world despots with our money. but theres no tricking anyoe this time. interesting that you acknowledge that it was a trick in the first place. taks comrade taks... just because. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meshugger Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 Kyoto had some very clever scheming behind the curtains which made it more succesful despite the US refusing to sign uh, kyoto wasn't successful, at least, it has not accomplished what it set out to accomplish. even if the copenhagen summit were "successful," neither would it have really accomplished anything, either, other than funding 3rd world despots with our money. but theres no tricking anyoe this time. interesting that you acknowledge that it was a trick in the first place. taks These political meetings seem to confuse me at times, but how would third world dictators gain any monetary aid from cutting on emissions? Was not the intent of the meeting to get a global cap on such things? Or are there darkroom meetings that i wasn't aware of? "Some men see things as they are and say why?""I dream things that never were and say why not?"- George Bernard Shaw"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."- Friedrich Nietzsche "The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it." - Some guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightshape Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 I'm sick of this "save the planet" bull. What they really mean is "save humanity", and frankly my only feeling on this topic is, f**k humanity, we deserve to die, we're a virus with shoe's and if we can't agree to stop being retarded then f**k us. Why not start with yourself? Having to share a planet with all these countries sucks Actually, I thought I'd start with you! Easier and fits with my self serving attitude. I came up with Crate 3.0 technology. Crate 4.0 - we shall just have to wait and see.Down and out on the Solomani RimNow the Spinward Marches don't look so GRIM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purkake Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 Actually, I thought I'd start with you! Easier and fits with my self serving attitude. You betray your own beliefs. You are nothing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nightshape Posted December 23, 2009 Share Posted December 23, 2009 Actually, I thought I'd start with you! Easier and fits with my self serving attitude. You betray your own beliefs. You are nothing! Ei. You're not reading my post correctly. I shall clarify. If humanity wipes itself out because it can't stop being petting, humanity deserves to die. Sulat I came up with Crate 3.0 technology. Crate 4.0 - we shall just have to wait and see.Down and out on the Solomani RimNow the Spinward Marches don't look so GRIM! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoraptor Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 I love our leftwing, bias newspapers here in the UK. This has to be one of the most openly agressive attacks on China I've seen from the media regarding the talks: It's preparation for putting carbon taxes on imports as a type of 'justified' protectionism. Having said that, there's a whole lot of uniformed garbage floating around in the UK, perhaps the most amusing is the thought that adding a carbon tax will help home grown production in agriculture. As almost all stock feed in the UK is imported from places like Brazil it would actually make things worse when compared to places where you stick a cow/ sheep in a paddock and it eats grass 24/7/365/chop/ship/chomp. Perhaps the worst hatchet job of the last few years was when some hack in the Grauniad (same guy maybe) decided New Zealand was not clean and green because CO2 emissions had gone up when, going by Kyoto, that's only half the equation and the amount of CO2 absorbed by new forests had gone up by so much more that we were well ahead of the Kyoto target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgon Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 Working conditions and standards of living in China are far from ideal and they are being asked to be rather more generous than they can afford, all in the interest of the 'greater good' I'm sure, but still. Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorgon Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 Anyway the moment it was clear that any agreement would not be legally binding the whole thing became academic, who knows who is going to be in the while house in 2050 and whether they are going to give a rats arse about what was decided nearly a generation before. These summits are a waste of time because commitments to do this or that are rather unceremoniously forgotten long before they were to be implemented. Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrath of Dagon Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 These political meetings seem to confuse me at times, but how would third world dictators gain any monetary aid from cutting on emissions? Was not the intent of the meeting to get a global cap on such things? Or are there darkroom meetings that i wasn't aware of? Hillary and Obama, that wacky couple, promised the developing world $100 billion a year if they'd sign on to the treaty, to compensate them for damage CO2 is causing them or some such. "Moral indignation is a standard strategy for endowing the idiot with dignity." Marshall McLuhan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theslug Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 I've seen articles where an entire chinese village just tosses their garbage into a giant mile long trench along a road and when the refuge pile is too high they set it on fire until it smolders to a reasonable level and then start topping it off again. But that's just one of a long list of blunders. Its a pretty horrible country. There was a time when I questioned the ability for the schizoid to ever experience genuine happiness, at the very least for a prolonged segment of time. I am no closer to finding the answer, however, it has become apparent that contentment is certainly a realizable goal. I find these results to be adequate, if not pleasing. Unfortunately, connection is another subject entirely. When one has sufficiently examined the mind and their emotional constructs, connection can be easily imitated. More data must be gleaned and further collated before a sufficient judgment can be reached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now