Immortality Posted November 29, 2006 Posted November 29, 2006 (edited) This interview was made some weeks ago, and Feargus and Ryan speak a bit about Obsidian and Neverwinter Nights II. A "taste": Feargus: [...] Interplay was moving away from PC RPGs and I wanted to continue to make them. In particular, Interplay lost the rights to make Baldur's Gate 3, which we had been working on internally for a couple of years at the time. As for coming back, I don't think I ever really left. [...] If you are curious, you can check it here: * In English * In Spanish (also contains info about Obsidian) You can also read past interviews (english and spanish) to Iron Tower Studio's Vince and BioWare's Rob Bartel here: http://entrevistas.clandlan.net/ Thanks Feargus and Ryan for your time Edited November 29, 2006 by Immortality Spanish translator. http://www.clandlan.net
Sand Posted November 29, 2006 Posted November 29, 2006 Good stuff! Thanks for sharing! Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
CoM_Solaufein Posted November 29, 2006 Posted November 29, 2006 Good read. Welcome to the Obsidian forums Immortality. War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is StrengthBaldur's Gate moddingTeamBGBaldur's Gate modder/community leaderBaldur's Gate - Enhanced Edition beta testerBaldur's Gate 2 - Enhanced Edition beta tester Icewind Dale - Enhanced Edition beta tester
metadigital Posted November 30, 2006 Posted November 30, 2006 Well, as I said, we've already done that once. I actually don't know Atari's specific plans for BG3, but I know that Baldur's Gate is important to them and that it enters into their thoughts about new products all of the time. (w00t) OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Pop Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 Well, as I said, we've already done that once. I actually don't know Atari's specific plans for BG3, but I know that Baldur's Gate is important to them and that it enters into their thoughts about new products all of the time. (w00t) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I WOULD KILL FOR BG3. But if Atari is in such dire straits (I don't know if they are) they could sell the property to Obs Join me, and we shall make Production Beards a reality!
Tigranes Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 If you want your fighter to become a Paladin, the next time he levels up, choose appropriately in the character screen. Wait, what? You can't have companions change classes freely, can you? Let's Play: Icewind Dale Ironman (Complete) Let's Play: Icewind Dale II Ironman (Complete) Let's Play: Divinity II (Complete) Let's Play: Baldur's Gate Trilogy Ironman - BG1 (Complete) Let's Play: Baldur's Gate Trilogy Ironman - BG2 (In Progress)
metadigital Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 Not that I've noticed. I tried to change a rogue into a Duelist, and a fighter into a Weapons Master, with no success. :| OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
Gorth Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 If you want your fighter to become a Paladin, the next time he levels up, choose appropriately in the character screen. Wait, what? You can't have companions change classes freely, can you? Maybe the "your" fighter is referring to your fighter, as in your fighter player character? Just a thought. “He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein
CoM_Solaufein Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 Well, as I said, we've already done that once. I actually don't know Atari's specific plans for BG3, but I know that Baldur's Gate is important to them and that it enters into their thoughts about new products all of the time. (w00t) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I WOULD KILL FOR BG3. But if Atari is in such dire straits (I don't know if they are) they could sell the property to Obs <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I would like to see BG3 but only if they used the IE engine. It would not be the same if they did not use that. War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is StrengthBaldur's Gate moddingTeamBGBaldur's Gate modder/community leaderBaldur's Gate - Enhanced Edition beta testerBaldur's Gate 2 - Enhanced Edition beta tester Icewind Dale - Enhanced Edition beta tester
samm Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 (edited) heh, no chance in hell the ie is coming back... and it doesn't have to, because the nwn2 engine seen from the traditional angle has the potential to look just as good or better (the latter especially concerning the individuality of characters). and on topic: i find some of the nwn2-related answers quite interesting. for example what feargus says about the pws and the ideas obsidian is trying to implement. Edited December 1, 2006 by samm Citizen of a country with a racist, hypocritical majority
kirottu Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 Well, as I said, we've already done that once. I actually don't know Atari's specific plans for BG3, but I know that Baldur's Gate is important to them and that it enters into their thoughts about new products all of the time. (w00t) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I WOULD KILL FOR BG3. But if Atari is in such dire straits (I don't know if they are) they could sell the property to Obs <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I would like to see BG3 but only if they used the IE engine. It would not be the same if they did not use that. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Xard Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 ^ My reaction Good stuff How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them. - OverPowered Godzilla (OPG)
Immortality Posted December 1, 2006 Author Posted December 1, 2006 (edited) Glad you liked the interview, I had a nice time asking questions too I almost fall off my chair when I read everything related to BG3. I'd also kill for BG3... BUT right now I am a bit concerned about how it would be... how would it be? 3D? D&D 3.5? Lacking extensive writing? I'd be very disappointed if BG3 turns out to be "consolized" like every game being released right now because console games just don't have the same quality as purely PC games (don't know why, but it's how it is). About BG3 being created using Infinity, I guess a lot of people would be extremely happy. I don't see Infinity being obsolete right now. Granted, it doesn't look as magnificent as the HL2 engine and it's variants (Prey/Dark Messiah of M&M) but for us BG lover's would be like "coming back home". And the lack of "OMG AWESOMIC" graphics would mean that the developers will have to center in the writing and content. The problem of all this? Sadly, if it has no "AWESOMIC" graphics, it won't sell as much. I don't know how viable it'd be for any company to go back in time and use old engines. It'd make a lot of old school people happy, but it won't attract newcomers, and as Lucian said, without Infinity it wouldnt be Baldur's Gate. In any case, there are some "successful" stories of how sagas have advanced. The TES games are a good example. TES Arena, TES Daggerfall, TES Morrowind and TES Oblivion are light years of one another and they all seem to be evolved nicely around the same story. Personal consideration: I don't want to see a 3D Anomen/Keldorn/Minsc/etc. Regards, Edited December 1, 2006 by Immortality Spanish translator. http://www.clandlan.net
Xard Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 (edited) IE engine is too old. Besides, NWN2 beats especially BG1 when it comes to roleplaying (and plot isn't certainly bad)... I've never finished first one. Too boring. If BG3 will be made, it'll propably use D&D 3.5 World has moved on Edited December 1, 2006 by Xard How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them. - OverPowered Godzilla (OPG)
kirottu Posted December 1, 2006 Posted December 1, 2006 From that article it This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Jorian Drake Posted December 2, 2006 Posted December 2, 2006 Not that I've noticed. I tried to change a rogue into a Duelist, and a fighter into a Weapons Master, with no success. :| <{POST_SNAPBACK}> report it as a bug then
Dark_Raven Posted December 2, 2006 Posted December 2, 2006 IE engine is too old. Besides, NWN2 beats especially BG1 when it comes to roleplaying (and plot isn't certainly bad)... I've never finished first one. Too boring. If BG3 will be made, it'll propably use D&D 3.5 World has moved on <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 3.5???????????? Best that it never sees the light of day. Hades was the life of the party. RIP You'll be missed.
Xard Posted December 2, 2006 Posted December 2, 2006 IE engine is too old. Besides, NWN2 beats especially BG1 when it comes to roleplaying (and plot isn't certainly bad)... I've never finished first one. Too boring. If BG3 will be made, it'll propably use D&D 3.5 World has moved on <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 3.5???????????? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What's problem with that? How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them. - OverPowered Godzilla (OPG)
Dark_Raven Posted December 2, 2006 Posted December 2, 2006 3.x = sucky Since this is a sequal to BG it would have to be AD&D rules. Hades was the life of the party. RIP You'll be missed.
Xard Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 Yes, I already understood it's "sucky" but WHY it is sucky How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them. - OverPowered Godzilla (OPG)
Immortality Posted December 3, 2006 Author Posted December 3, 2006 (edited) Probably because Revan is a hardcore fan. And I guess the fear of all us hardcore fans is the fact that as the "world moved on", the writing and NPC interactions in games has become a bit worse and uninteresting... and I just don't get why "awesomic graphics" also mean "poor npc interaction" Also, I assume Revan means that having a BG3 with another engine and with D&D 3.5 just wouldn't *feel* like BG, no matter how well created the story is... Now, about BG1, it was extremely boring, granted, but it was a very pure RPG (NWN doesn't beat BG to that, sorry. It beats it to many other things but not roleplaying. I found NWN much more boring that BG1, and that's a lot to say ). If you are interested, anyway, there is a mod that adds NPC interaction. Lots of it! Anyway, if you get BG3, make it nicer visually, use another engine, add lots of very well written NPC interaction and then call it "Dragon Age"... Edited December 3, 2006 by Immortality Spanish translator. http://www.clandlan.net
White Knight Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 Obsidian, please pardon my ignorance if this is already common knowledge, but i have been wondering if i can plan for a new Baldur's Gate installment. Ever since i first played Baldur's Gate SOA i was amazed at everything that was combined into the game. I've played all the Baldur's Gate games i can, and ever since good ole' Black Isle went under a few years ago i've been dying for another one. The two console games were great, but i feel that something was lost in translation between the two platforms. So in short, will there be another Baldur's Gate or will i just be reminiscing with SOA? Thanks and continue to make the best games out there. No tree ever blossoms overnight, and no fruit ever falls in a day
metadigital Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 I think we can merge these two topics. From that article it OBSCVRVM PER OBSCVRIVS ET IGNOTVM PER IGNOTIVS OPVS ARTIFICEM PROBAT
kirottu Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 From that article it This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
White Knight Posted December 3, 2006 Posted December 3, 2006 I may be mistaken but when Black Isle was shut down, Jefferson was supposedly cancelled wasnt it? Or was the work just continued by Obsidian (considering it was founded by the Black Isle crew)? No tree ever blossoms overnight, and no fruit ever falls in a day
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now