AA Institute Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Terminator Will Be Back Creature-effects supervisor John Rosengrant of Stan Winston Studios confirmed to SCI FI Wire that he has met with director Jonathan Mostow recently about the possibility of a new Terminator movie, but nothing is a go yet. "It's too early to figure out what a new Terminator would look like, or anything like that," said Rosengrant, who was the creature-effects supervisor on the upcoming film Doom, starring Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson. In the first three Terminator films, Arnold Schwarzenegger, now governor of California, starred as a robot from the future. The original 1984 film was one of the first projects for special-effects designer Stan Winston, whose studio created the effects for such films as Aliens and Jurassic Park, as well as the two Terminator sequels. Rosengrant said it is too early to figure out what a new robot from the future would look like if the franchise were to continue. "You usually don't do that kind of thing," Rosengrant said about designing a new Terminator. "You see the script and what spark comes from that, [talk] with the director and see what the vision is. It does no good to dream it up unless you write a treatment and try to get out there and sell it yourself." Mostow, who directed Terminator 3: The Rise of the Machines, has said he was interested in a fourth Terminator film and commissioned a story written by Terminator 3 screenwriters John D. Brancato and Michael Ferris. Nick Stahl, who starred as John Connor in the third film, is signed for two more sequels. "I know Jonathan Mostow said he had a script idea for it, and I did talk to him, and he did say that, but I don't know," Rosengrant said. "I keep hearing that there's going to be a Terminator 4. That's all it's been, just rumblings." http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire2005/index.php AA --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.publishedauthors.net/aa_spaceagent/ "The ultimate dream adventure awaiting humanity..." --------------------------------------------------------------- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darque Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 yuck What can they really do at this point? Send a robot back to get them in the bunker? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanschu Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I think it's getting to the point where things won't be going "back" but we'll be seeing the war after Judgement Day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oerwinde Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I think the only new Terminator concept they could go with would be like a team of Terminators. Possibly 2 or 3 that link together to become more powerful. The area between the balls and the butt is a hotbed of terrorist activity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surreptishus Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Devastimator!! Futuristic war movie might be good, but it just isnt't the same without Ahhnuld. I don't want the old botox ridden fatass Arnold - unless he provides the voice for a fully cgi one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveThaiBinh Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I didn't see Terminator 3, and all the people who did should be feeling ashamed right about now, because it's your fault that Terminator 4 is even being considered. "An electric puddle is not what I need right now." (Nina Kalenkov) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surreptishus Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 T3 was ok, if the first two were A/A+ then T3 was a B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamond Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I didn't see Terminator 3, and all the people who did should be feeling ashamed right about now, because it's your fault that Terminator 4 is even being considered. How true. :"> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaguars4ever Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 T3 was ok, if the first two were A/A+ then T3 was a B. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Agreed. More importantly however, The Governator MUST make a cameo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Launch Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I didn't see Terminator 3, and all the people who did should be feeling ashamed right about now, because it's your fault that Terminator 4 is even being considered. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Terminator 3 wasn't a terrible movie, but for some reason they decided to opt for the "cheese" angle as opposed to the previous two's "dark" angles... the female terminator was totally unnecessary... all she did well was fill out that leather outfit, and that wasn't particularly nice either... red didn't suit her complexion... " DL [color=gray][i]OO-TINI![/i][/color] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surreptishus Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 No Diamond!! don'y let steve bully you he always belittles people!! Stand up and be proud of the T3 viewing!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaguars4ever Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Very true Launchie (although I had no objection to the tight-leather-terminatrix). There were some Comedy Gold moments in T3. :D Talk to the hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveThaiBinh Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 No Diamond!! don'y let steve bully you he always belittles people!! Stand up and be proud of the T3 viewing!! I'm a meanie. How true. :"> Recognising the problem means you're halfway to the cure already. We'll have you watching decent movies in no time. "An electric puddle is not what I need right now." (Nina Kalenkov) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanschu Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I agree that T3 was much more comedy than the other ones. In my encounters, the only ones that really liked it were the ones that liked the first two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamond Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 (edited) Stand up and be proud of the T3 viewing!! Yes, YES, I watched Terminator 3! I liked the first two, but not T3. The story must have an end, I hope T4 won't see the light of the day. Edited November 7, 2005 by Diamond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurlshort Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I didn't like T3...except for the ending. Since we had been strung along in the 2nd and most of the 3rd movie, I really wasn't quite sure if they'd go with the ending they did. I don't want to spoil it for anybody though. The ending means the next movie could be a complete departure in plot from the previous three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyric Suite Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Meh, i though T2 sucked as well... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baley Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 (edited) T3 was okay,not as good as the original but better than the second one. At least it didn't have bloody children. Edited November 7, 2005 by Baley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volourn Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 T3 was good. T2 was the best Termiantor. T1 was good but the romance in it was lame. T4 will likely be fun; but Arnold needs to be in it. Come on, Arnold!! DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surreptishus Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Well the romance was needed to bring about John Connor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volourn Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Yeha; but because of it it seemed fake and forced. The romance in T3 seemed more real, and natural between John and his girlfriend. His mother's romance felt like it was put in because they had no choice to do so. DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsel Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Good Grief! This is as bad as Stallone doing another Rocky & Rambo. If James Cameron isn’t involved in T4 then expect it to be a Box Office stinkeroo. " Tsel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baley Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 Why? Cameron wasn't directly involved in T3 either,if memory serves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsel Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 I didn’t care for T3 neither. I do concede it had a lot of hope and prospect to be one awesome movie, but it lacked Cameron’s insidious micromanaging storyline character development and it showed on film. T3 had lots of action and spectacular effects and it was a literal roller coaster ride, but it all seemed superficial. The storyline depth contained in capturing the viewers emotions was missing. Tsel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Surreptishus Posted November 7, 2005 Share Posted November 7, 2005 But the comedy!!! Arnie's jokes!!! (w00t) The fact that it was lacking the original theme hurt it a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now