BattleCookiee

FAR better than Diablo 2 IMHO (Waits for furry of D2 fanboys, or don't we have those here?)

Witches Wake is created by some of the creators of NWN "

Can I still keep my car parked outside now?

You've got a point. Let's bore the WoT kids with this one then

Yep

Only HK... (ask him why he says "meatbag" after Kotor1's relevation...) Or just listen to HK's rant in Kotor2 that his copies say "organic"

You have PC? Then just download the bik-viewer (http://www.radgametools.com/default.htm) to see that this is total BS.

Only have to fear dialers if you have dial-up (no cable, DSL etc.) But there are plenty of other nasty spyware programs (keyloggers anyone?)

Add Deus Ex to my "currently playing list" And about AoE III. AoE was good AoE II was very good AoM sucked AoE III sucks very badly

Nah, they are inside (you missed Handmaiden's poem BTW) Never had been able to unlock them either though...

Mmm, why do you deliver more proof piracy killed Looking Glass? And they were in such a shape due to piracy and low sales of previous games... And why was there economic instability in the first place...? Could be due to reduced sales, which in their place was caused by increased piracy?

^ Too bad that is more rule than exception these days...

http://forums.obsidianent.com/index.php?sh...514&hl=Galaxies and a screenshot should be on the last, or the one before the last page.

How different is that from dl'ing it. With both they get absolutely no cash at all for their effort... Note how making games costs money; NOT only the disk, manual, box and shipping... Sure, some would not buy it; but the amount of people that DL it even when they would buy it, and thus won't buy it because they have it would is bigger. Yep, they make profit. And the people who loose are: Honest costumers, developers, publishers, etc. LOADS of Devs (Troika anyone?) went broke because their game didn't get bought, only downloaded ALOT. So even if many people played it, they didn't get the profits of that... Also, if a product is *nice*, but has bugs, EVERY user has a problem if the game sells bad; since then the dev won't produce patches to fix it, and the game stays in it's bad state. Nope. Many, many, many good games get sold badly; and many crap games sold well. Shiny anyone? Quality games: Low Sales. Crap Enter the Matrix: Ca$h... And correctly so. Many people I know posses complete film-collections on DVD. And they watch them regularly. Cost: $0. Profit for the creators; even less... Meh. I recall reading on these boards that games still cost the same as 8 years ago. But for some reason people needed to DL more and buy less... (even if they can buy more games, since the pay etc. did raise) Higher prices are no excuse if there are no higher prices

Takes a pretty long time now... Repost this topic when you actually have the story, instead of boosting it and keeping it on page 1 when there is no content in the thread...

Many spoilers now - moved to Spoilers section

Stupid Cash-milking of LA... Nothing good to say about it... (Oh, did I also say "quite impossible"...; as HK said himself; even droids die if they don't get maintenance... and did he have 4000 years of maintance?)

Moved from WoT to Spoilers to General. What a trip Anyways, PC right? Did you open swkotor2.ini and added EnableCheats=1 where it should?

Topic double posted... This one gets locked, continue here

First off all; being payed to play games (even if it is 2000x the same level/part) is probably a damn nice job (except with bad games) Hell, we need to do it ourselves with the modern RPG's (KOTOR2, Vampire, Dungeon Siege2 come to mind) and for that testing we pay $50,- If you work they might actually listen to your comments on ingame-bugs too And on the 3 notes above: 1. So? 2. Watches Kotor2 box, or recalls his DS2 Beta Version Copy. Can't really imagine that... 3. If a game is good, 20x the same area still doesn't bore (trust me, I know...)

Why do you agree with the same assessment of Vampire and not of Morrowind when both need the player to aim and the character to hit? The player *has* to aim at his targets in both games, then expect the character to hit based on its own skill set. ... I'm glad you asked. I have seen an

^ Agreed on Vampire, already said that myself. Omikron: Dunno Morrowing: Negatory here, I said that a kill was player-dependant (and you have to aim and such). In MW it is totally Skill Dependant... And if shooting was removed from DX there isn't alot of DX left... actually, there is nothing anymore (like you say with FPS) In DX there are not alot of ways to "talk yourself" out of combat situations. A lot less than the options to talk yourself "into combat" atleast. Also; yes, you can sneak around. Does anybody deny that fact. But first person sneaking isn't a genre (unlike Splintercell and MGS's third persons "stealth games")

Some say no Some say yes Alot of battle came of it... try searching in spoilers section for "Kreia Arren" and see for yourself why some people think (wrongly) yes, and some think no...

Even better than the current 1/100 or such that it is now... And for playing before buying: Demo's work here. I cannot believe you if you say almost no game has a demo now. Like 90% of the PC games have Demo's produced for them...

Aha, the Pro-piracy "common rule" Now I can tell you I know alot of people who just download it because it is "free". They just complete the game 5 times (dl'ed) without paying once, or ever hadding the intention to do so. And they surely would have done so IF they couldn't found it free on the net. Heck, most of the people don't even own legal software here anymore; their PC is stuffed with dl'ed stuff they use VERY regularly, but just refuse to pay for "enter lame excuse here"...