kanisatha

Some nuclear weapons proliferation experts (academics) have also now said this publicly. The claim is that two of the sixteen P-1000 Vulkan anti-ship missiles had nuclear warheads, which was standard practice during Cold War deployments.

Yeah in the log for the patch that came with the DLC release they say several things that were not available in the OC have now been added to the game. But apparently not retro'd to the OC. https://forums.solasta-game.com/forum/lost-valley-full-patch-notes

Here are a couple of upcoming games I've following. Would be interested in people's thoughts: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1579340/Survive_the_Fall/ https://store.steampowered.com/app/1478850/Vendir_Plague_of_Lies/

Two extremely interesting and intriguing recent bits of information: Biden Administration debate on how far to go sharing intel with Ukraine: https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-putin-biden-united-states-europe-b12831d7c6990c1b76802b16845b75a2 Russians pissed at extent of US and allied military aid to Ukraine: https://www.stripes.com/theaters/europe/2022-04-15/russia-warns-us-to-stop-arming-ukraine-5694229.html

Indeed. The Slava class was built with the capacity to carry and use nukes for both its anti-sub rocket system and its land-attack/anti-ship missile system. But they have not carried nukes since the end of the Cold War. So I also would agree it is highly unlikely Moskva took on nukes for this mission. But at the same time, many of Russia's decisions in this war make little sense, so who knows. It's possible in the current environment, the Russians saw Moskva's role as including nuclear deterrence against NATO in the Black Sea.

Here's great coverage about the Moskva: https://www.19fortyfive.com/2022/04/meet-the-moskva-how-ukraine-nearly-sank-russias-black-sea-flagship/

The new Solasta DLC (it's a full new campaign from level 1 to 12) is out: https://store.steampowered.com/app/1723950/Solasta_Crown_of_the_Magister__Lost_Valley/

Hehe. Beamdog and I have parted company, so I have no interest in anything from them.

Not so in the ICC, where the principle that one was ordered to do something does not count as a defense has been established.

Okay as much as I hate people who whine, I may have to become a whiner myself if we don't get any real information about this game very soon. Why such a strident information blackout? It's downright cruel and mean-spirited that Obsidian is unwilling to say anything about this game.

Still haven't started playing this game, but just saw in Steam that the DLC has a 30-something percent "like" rating. Is it that awful?

Countries never have money for such things as education, healthcare, or infrastructure, but then somehow always have plenty of money for military hardware. It's just like with people: always complaining about no money for food and rent and medical care and school tuition, but have plenty of money for designer clothes, a fancy cellphone, a huge-screen TV, and expensive concert/sporting event tickets.

So then would you say there should be no Article 5 response in case of a 9/11-style attack on any other NATO member (including potentially Sweden)? Or is this just for the US? I'm trying to understand your logic here because the 9/11 attack fully satisfied Article 5 conditions. Also, I vaguely recall that it was NATO, led by France, that invoked Article 5 after 9/11, and not the US.

Russia's position now is a very sharp contrast with its position a couple of months ago, when it explicitly threatened a military response to these countries joining NATO.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/04/06/bucha-barbarism-atrocities-russian-soldiers/ https://www.tweet247.net/news/world/in-bucha-ukraine-evidence-of-torture-beheadings-by-russian-soldiers https://twitter.com/maxbearak/status/1511947644788170756

A lot of the civilians murdered in Bucha were decapitated. Many had been tortured first before being killed. Sounds very much like Wagner and/or Kadyrov's thugs to me. But what's now happening in Mariupol and surrounding smaller towns is several orders of magnitude worse than Bucha. Estimates are that over 5,000 civilians have been killed thus far (just in the Mariupol area), with some 100,000 trapped and facing starvation.

I did spend a couple of days in Barrow, Alaska, in June, many years ago. It was indeed nuts; kids playing outside at 2 am!! But it was also so very interesting as a sociological experience. Plus, now I can say I have dipped my toes in all four oceans of the world!

Yes indeed, definitely the climate as well. And since we're on this topic, even though it is off-topic for this thread, I just have to ask because I've heard it said so very often: Do you guys from Sweden and Finland believe that your society and your people are melancholy by nature because of the climate in which you live? That the way you are and the way you live your lives, and even the way you express yourselves, are all driven by a pervasive sense of melancholy that permeates your society? The social and behavioral scientist in me has long been very curious about this claim.

Well in Russia's case, the physical isolation of living deep inside a huge landmass also makes their people more paranoid and xenophobic, as has historically been the case with Russians.

A valid point, but I would argue almost entirely because the overall population sizes are so very small. People get along with one another and are nicer to one another in small groups (because having shared values and achieving consensus is sooooo much easier). They become downright onery when lumped into large groups.

I would definitely fall into the category of "don't believe" and also don't accept.

It's great to see someone say this, because to this day many people, even intelligent people, keep being stuck on this mindset that military invasion is the preferred way for countries to get resources. Military invasion is a stupid way to access resources, and buying/trading for it is sooooooo much cheaper.

Certainly. But there is always the option of asking, instead of jumping to a conclusion ... unless that jumped-to conclusion is what that person wants to push as their narrative.

Saw a wire service report that said not only are the Russians looking to make sure that in Mariupol (and I suspect other areas) their atrocities will not be revealed like in Bucha by burning bodies, they're also looking to stage a massive false flag op to divert world attention away from the Bucha Massacre because that massacre is actually resonating with people all over the world. People are beginning to refer to Putin as the Butcher of Bucha.

Yup. It also says something more fundamental about Russia as a country. Russia is already one of the world's richest countries in natural resources, and yet they want to attack and destroy a smaller, weaker neighbor to steal what little that neighbor has. There is a certain psychosis involved in having such a mindset. Plus, it also shows that Russia has no confidence in itself to build a real economy, based on manufacturing, services, and intellectual property, and instead only expects the sale of commodities to be its future.