Gorgon

Well that follows, so, whats quiet at high loads. I have bought Zalman in the past, and have been happy with them, but they sometimes have issues with very low RPMS, below what the CPU fan timer thinks is acceptable and once in a while it would auto shutdown at low loads.

What is your opinion on what happened then, if as you say there are indications of a cover up and prior knowledge, of the towers not 'collapsing like they should'. What does it mean if not government conspiracy, martians ?.

Maybe not, just saying the evenings are hot.

So, you actually believe that the Bush administration and the military industrial complex orchestrated 9/11 to get paid, and that somewhere a secret cadre still knows what really went on. I don't. You see taking those inconsistencies and conflicting statements about 9/11 to their logical conclusion is not as easy as merely pointing out that they exist.

Because of the hot weather my CPU cooler has been making a lot of noise when playing games. Then last night when I was playing Clear Sky it went completely overboard, sounding like a jet engine taking off, I had to stop playing. It's the same with other games. CPU stays around 25 C though, so it's not failing, its merely getting extremely noisy for some reason. So, recommendations on a quiet CPU cooler, that is, quiet both under low and high loads.

HBO made some of my favorite shows, so just on the strength of that it might actually be good, it would be the first time ever that a TV show tried on the fantasy genre without targeting kids exclusively though.

+s

Breaking the silence has been repeatedly ridiculed by official Israel as being 'activists', but you have to ask yourself what soldiers who were actually in the Gaza action have to gain by making this stuff up. If this really happened it isn't the kind of thing you bring up at the debriefing without subjecting yourself to repercussions. So, how exactly does the story get told without anonymity. If a new source forgets to mention where these allegations came from, I dunno, maybe the editor was drunk, we will never know. This is about the organization called breaking the silence and how it gets reported, you can't separate the topic from its context, well you can, but what would be the point of offering the example at all then. You might have picked something less charged if you didn't want the one overshadowing the other though.

****.

Isn't the government usually in control of public services? I'm a freelancing public servant. ... and the guy with the thing the thread is about is a moron, I don't know what made him so.

They'll Live. Besides, that's why they pay them the big bucks.

I consider keeping the mods from developing megalomania a public service, it's nothing personal.

Come on guys, it shouldn't really be necessary to add new words to the language filter. No, but you reallly really want to, don't you. Despite your attempts to play it down, you are the one who makes a big deal about language, even when you don't have to.

Whats with the crossword puzzle, 'tosser' is 6 letters.

Cut the power to a major metropolis for a few hours and it's every man for himself, I'd say the conceit that allows us all to pretend we are altruistic creatues is deceptively weak. Thats not particularly directed at economics, but it does reflect it somewhat.

The police can be quite terrifying, but I don't see what the problem is with standing still long enough to recieve a ticket.

Thy readeth from page one of his crackpot manifesto, infidel !

I don't know how many cancer patients you can provide for with a few million, but I'd wager not very many. Certainly not as many servicemen as would be affected by smoking related illnesses, whatever that number is.

Because if you had actually been in anything remotely resembling a combat outfit, you'd know better than to go around pontificating with these "facts" of yours. And considering that there are cases of world-class athletes who smoke, I have a hard time imagining you have a clue at all. You are mixing things up, for a rather comical effect. Administrative regulations, of which militaries have a lot, have very little to do with restricting the personal freedoms of soldiers. And your average grunt doesn't bother with those if he can help it. Other than how and when to salute, what's the insignia for a Sgt. and, depending on their assignment, ROE and prisoner treatment stuff (there's always at least an NCO to remind them, anyway) "regulations" in the sense you are speaking are of very little concern to soldiers outside offices. They are not civil servants, trust me on that. But yeah, I guess it makes sense. If you ignore all evidence to the contrary, that is. You are the one insisting that military rules have to do with maintaining discipline and that anything above that, specifically the smoking ban, constitutes misuse of power. I think they call that 'stating opinion as fact'. I basically agree with your opinion, but for purposes of definition, the right to smoke on the job is not guaranteed anywhere in the constitution. I'm curious, whats your stand on the Weyco smoking ban. They are the ones who offer health insurance to their employees, don't they have the right to make sure they can have the best bargaining position with their insurance carriers.

I don't understand the 'doing your bit for your country' thing at all, I never have. Unless your country happens to be doing the right thing at the particular moment, which is usually rare, but that's another discussion I suppose. On balance banning soldiers from smoking is too meddlesome, but I don't feel strongly about it obviously.

No. Discipline is about enforcing a code of conduct and ensuring the fighting ability of the force. If a rule cannot be reasonably ascribed to either it's arbitrary and, consequently, an abuse of power. That's not the point, and I seriously doubt any army would conform to your high standards. You need a bureaucracy to run any large government controlled operation, that means loads of rules that don't make a lot of apparent sense. This one does, it's intrusive, but it makes sense.

The army is all about rules and regulations so you could say it goes with the territory. It might affect recruitment in the long run but this is the way of the world now, no smoking in bars, public places, hell the only (legal) place left is in my apartment. Don't meet my smoker friends in cafes anymore, they can't have their poison. The second hand smoking complaint is genuine, but out in the open, come on.

uhh apparently the NY times don't allow remote linking. Anyway google 'Weyco smoking ban'

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/08/business/08smoking.html I believe the standard answer to this story is that people are perfectly free not to join the company and therefore it's health care plans don't infringe on individual liberty. I Imagine Obama is considering the army ban for much the same reason as Weyco. I smoke myself, and yet I can understand why it's being considered. It would save money in the long run, and I believe the US army already has 'socialized' medical care.

How many percent chance of spontaneous death again.