While I understand your ethical reasons for being a veg, what I don't understand are your reasons for painting red meat as inherently unhealthy. Any diet based solely on one kind of food can't be very healthy... but that doesn't mean that food is bad by itself.
I mean, if you are so convinced of the advantages of your lifestyle, why misrepresent the alternatives?
Red meat is reasonably bad for you in the sense that nutritionally the alternatives are superior (and I'm conceding that includes some other forms of meat here), while having far fewer (if any) of the downsides. The optimal healthy amount is roughly a maximum of a fist-sized amount once every two days. Given that the majority of red meat eaters consume far more than this quantity (i.e. unhealthy amounts), I think it's reasonable to portray red-meat diets as unhealthy.
So I guess in summary, no, I am not misrepresenting anything.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...9032301626.html
http://www.csiro.au/resources/The-facts-on...g-red-meat.html