redneckdevil

I'll name some later. FONV 1. Starting with fo3 as my first fallout game, I had always killed house because I couldn't ever stomach killing this white knights. House always talked badly bout them but never cared, until I did quests for them and saw their ending slides. I had one of those moments where I was wrong and a ingame character was right. Been a house follower ever since. 2. Had guide, so thought I knew everything. Was playing a certain way where I wouldn't boost stats with temporary things and books. Recruiting prostitutes and couldn't get the ghoul because I couldn't hit any of the dialogue choices, and thought I'd have to fail it. Talked later but had a certain alcohol on me and she accepted. 3. Dead money, the whole damn part and especially leaving Morrowind 1. Getting off the boat and looking around. Beautiful. 2. Finding out that the bad guys aren't actually bad and the good guys aren't good guys.

Germany didn't start the first one though, they only got blamed for it and that blame caused the second ww

Shieeeet, I think I developed a little bit of a crush on you now Gorth. Without a doubt the biggest reason me and the people I know want out of the EU, Yes the EU has problems! Yes we need to tackle them! But are you really so blind that you think going out will solve the problems? It is the worst option... Give it a few years and Britain will be gone from the international politics and to some extent economics. Going out is not really a option of you want to stay relevant as a country.Are you really unable to see what the EU has done for you? That right there should already give u red flags. So why should Britain wanting and leaving the EU have the conclusion that they will be phase out of international politics and economics?Why did the britains want the Brexit? I honestly don't know, it just shows a lack of general education amongst the public (which is a government failure). People apparently don't understand what they are doing. I really don't see any advantage of Brexit that could possibly weigh up to the disadvantages. I wasn't implying britains reason for leaving, I was talking about since Britain isn't gonna be part of the fan club anymore that they are gonna disappear from economics and international politics. Why can't Britain stand on its own and why does it HAVE to be part of it? That's the red flags right there that if they are part of the group that they have to be dealt with unfavorably. Not favorably OR neutral, but unfavorably. That's the red flags right there.

Shieeeet, I think I developed a little bit of a crush on you now Gorth. Without a doubt the biggest reason me and the people I know want out of the EU, Yes the EU has problems! Yes we need to tackle them! But are you really so blind that you think going out will solve the problems? It is the worst option... Give it a few years and Britain will be gone from the international politics and to some extent economics. Going out is not really a option of you want to stay relevant as a country.Are you really unable to see what the EU has done for you? That right there should already give u red flags. So why should Britain wanting and leaving the EU have the conclusion that they will be phase out of international politics and economics?

TBH I wouldn't trust the polls. So far I'm getting calls almost every day asking who I will vote for and it's the same people. Even I tell them multiple times (what sometimes I'm stoned when they call and forget who they are lol) they keep calling. So u get enough people like me who REAlLY invested, one person could be quite a percentage depending on how many times they asked them lol

When you say differences do you mean the current political rift in the USA? Yes and no, I'm talking about the whole time. Indians, Chinese, Irish, Blacks, LGBT, Poor, different political parties, Japanese, Religions other than Christianity, just to name off the top of my head. The Asians and the Irish aren't as bad off anymore (thanks to the Irish being the first ones to form the mafia and the Asians not holding a grudge), but the rest is still a big problem in some cases and have seen attacks and discrimination against the rest in my life time and still cases today. I dunno why the blacks are still discriminated against but I have a feeling it's because of the Democratic Party and votes, and since they ain't contributing as much as they used to, it's not the illegal immigrants that have become their new meal ticket. The poor will always because they can't/won't contribute to the overall ideal of parties. The LGBT have in the past because they were considered a "dead end" vote since a lot wouldn't be able to have kids and keep the votes going so there was no need to interrupt what the going religious/culture stipulation. Christianity isn't the national "official" religion but with the majority of the people who do religion follow that, it's widely accepted as the standard. Having religions that are similiar are usually accepted as okay, but something drastically different or "violent" isn't and meets with opposition. Our country isn't what people think it is or as great as it is. It's good and I love it, but we are in no ways perfect and still an experiment that's evolving and seems like DEvolving. I think worse case is that we are trying to make EVERYONE happy and u know what happens when u try to do that

Just take a look at America and how we deal with "differences" and the poor to get an idea on how the USoE would handle.

I'll be the odd man out and say I don't want them to become USoE and I don't support the EU ATM. Reason why I don't want them to become the USoE is because I don't think it will work. The only reason why USA "worked" was because the laws AND culture all followed a single path. It didn't matter where u came from, once u became a citizen u were sweeped up in the "American Way!" and u was expected to at least partake in the culture. U could still keep ur culture from the mother lands, u was expected it to put it second to the American Way. EU does not have that unified approach (well some would argue that it does but u have to be either a minority or a Muslim) so there's no unity as far as culture and identity. I'm a firm believer that people should keep their identity, with USoE I see a lot of countries losing that which sets them apart. 2. I don't really agree with EU but then again it doesn't affect me that I know of and I'm not to keen on knowledge of it so don't take me as a knowledgeable person on the subject. To me it looks like it is doomed to fail (hopefully not) because it basically means with the open borders are done wrong in my opinion and also the plan seems like eventually everyone is gonna fail because everyone's in it together. The losers will fail and the winners will have to sacrifice to keep the losers afloat and eventually the winners aren't gonna be able to do it. I mean winners and losers subjectively because it early and I can't seem to think of the PC word for the countries who will lose money and people and such and the ones who are gonna be able to stay afloat.

That was a good interview

Reason it's no big deal is because as Americans unless I've been living under a rock already pretty think that the rich don't pay a lot in taxes because of "donating to charities" as a usual tax break that's played and practiced. You know the whole "I'm gonna pay an absobate amount at a friend/college charity banquet and thru business deals get that money back and vice versa in doing the same for them and then putting it on taxes as an amount "we have already paid for".... That's why unless u dislike Trump why it doesn't bother the average American because we know all the politicians are doing it for years, so why should we care now? And if it IS that big a deal, then blast Clintons for doing it as well thru their Clinton foundation because they've been exposed to money laundering by even bypassing the charity thing and just donating and investing and taking loans outta their other partially owned organizations.

BruceVC, I really think that's were most of the country is split up and it's more focused on 2 things. Do the average voter want more money or do they want to push equality/standards/etc. The problem is under both, neither will happen. USA will not get richer under neither Trump NOR Hillary, and the influence we are/have been currently spreading is actually a double edged sword and not something to boast about currently. The influence we are/have been spreading seems like it's one thing, but we are doing it in a way to appear we are doing so but in actualluality we are just trapping and bringing people down to the same level. It appears a lot of what we are spreading/doing is raising up but we are doing so by bringing down the other side. I know that doesn't make sense right now (welfare is big clue) and to worn out to explain coherently, but neither side is getting what they think they are getting with either candidates.

Sigh it was a very good episode I about died when Garrison was talking about Putin lmfao

I'll be honest, as an American, I can find Putin somewhat like able. I mean America doesn't have a spotless reputation and has done many things to put any of Putin's acts to shame. It's actually sad that if we compare American politicians to Putin, he can seem very like able lol.

Very true. I do find it quite funny that fallout 4 got such high review scores from company's while the user review score doesn't even get past 6.4. Fallout new Vegas on the other hand got decent company review scores but users scores are higher than the professional reviewers. Tbh I think Obsidians in a better place than Bethesda when it comes to fallout since I'd rather have the people buying the product like it more than the "professional" reviewers. Ce la vi. Hopefully that's the real reason why it's taking a while for TES 6 because they finally looked at the reviewer scores instead and HOPEFULLY are trying to decide how much rpg they need to put back into their sandbox shooter. Hopefully.

For the most part people don't realize we being rude, but we can make it very known lol

Except the loot drops were horrible in comparison. Find a legendary purple weapon but its useless compared to a crafted weapon made of simple iron. I liked crafting in the Witcher games, but that's because it made sense with alchemy and the role it plays in both gameplay and in the fiction, but many games that are adding/have added crafting systems in recent years didn't need one and don't benefit from it. Skyrim for example. Why roam and explore if u can craft and make weapons that pale to what the daedric princes would give? I will second that the witcher 3 had a good crafting system and made sense.

Okay I am disappointed in all of yu's, no one has mentioned (that I've seen) that JazzPunk is on the ps4!!! Bout ****ing time!!

I hope Volo doesnt read this....he will have a field day expressing his horror at BLM being racist ...volo is very sensitive about these things Here's the thing and I wanna ask u a question because I can't seem to get an answer from my friends about this. With the cop killing innocents, why is when it happens to a white/Latino/Asian/etc it's viewed as the cops ****ed up badly, but when it happens to a black person its a racist act and not simply a huge **** up with like with the others?

Sigh, now we got the riots in my neck of the woods. ****ed up situation but the rioting making it MUCH worse! Protesters killing and shooting other protesters, blocking highways and steal vehicles and jacking cargo of trucks, and running down and mobbing whites for being whites. Both sides in the wrong and ****ing it up for everyone.

Now I'm gonna have to visit Russia just to ride the damn subway

I know right?! Since they attacking Trump on him saying its a bomb, they trying their hardest not to say bomb now.

Interesting that you omitted that the media was taken for a ruse to show how incompetent they are and how they now have to admit the following instead: Please do a little research before saying " Hilary started the Birther Obama controversy " Its has been debunked many times now, Hilary Clinton did not start this malicious rumour http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/sep/23/donald-trump/hillary-clinton-obama-birther-fact-check/ http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/09/16/no-hillary-clinton-did-not-start-birther-movement/90500762/ Bill Clinton, is that you? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYnl6GMOBIA Kate Bolduan is a very astute political commentator, she has the daily show on CNN " State of the Race " and yes the various CNN commentators are right. Trump not only wasted peoples time but he horribly flip flopped on this issue This is something we should all be condemning as it shows how Trump uses the media when it suits him but then whines about " the media is biased and has horrible people working for it " when the " media " doesn't comment on what he likes Why should we be condemning him for using something that is against him and benefiting from it doing what it thinks it should be doing? Normally we praise people for that. So what is it then as I am confused? Is the media as many people on this forum suggest biased against Trump Or is the media not biased when Trump decides to use them? Because as I keep saying the media is not fundamentally biased, the media reports on what candidates do and what they say The media is very biased against Trump and so the media is doing what it believes is it job to dissuade voters from him and to Hillary, the only problem is is that with most things in this country it's no longer subtle about it and the way they are going on is outta touch with a lot of people. So trump is playing that angle and gaining a lot of voters from simply having the media against him being president. Weither he make a good president or not aside, he's doing a good political move that makes it seem he has some what decent knowledge on how politics goes. Tbh to me it seems most Americans know that to get to that spot, the person is not gonna be a saint and we know they are gonna be somewhat corrupted but it's gonna be kept under wraps. What we don't know won't hurt us type mentality as long as it's not hurting us financially or physically (mentally I believe we crave the abuse). With Trump it looks like he has problems but they are fixable problems and are visible but not really overbearing (we haven't really been pro immigration ever really so that doesn't bother as many citizens) whereas Hillary is been open and obvious because she's been doing a very piss poor job at covering it up and we are used to politicians who aren't good at keeping their dirty laundry out of the open tried and jailed and/or some sort of action that makes them lose some or all their political power/position and she's refusing that.

Interesting that you omitted that the media was taken for a ruse to show how incompetent they are and how they now have to admit the following instead: Please do a little research before saying " Hilary started the Birther Obama controversy " Its has been debunked many times now, Hilary Clinton did not start this malicious rumour http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/sep/23/donald-trump/hillary-clinton-obama-birther-fact-check/ http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/09/16/no-hillary-clinton-did-not-start-birther-movement/90500762/ Bill Clinton, is that you? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYnl6GMOBIA Kate Bolduan is a very astute political commentator, she has the daily show on CNN " State of the Race " and yes the various CNN commentators are right. Trump not only wasted peoples time but he horribly flip flopped on this issue This is something we should all be condemning as it shows how Trump uses the media when it suits him but then whines about " the media is biased and has horrible people working for it " when the " media " doesn't comment on what he likes Why should we be condemning him for using something that is against him and benefiting from it doing what it thinks it should be doing? Normally we praise people for that.

Omfg I'm dying lmao! Ok this ****ty election was worth it to see that picture lol

I'll see how well Gary does in the debates. If he does decent or great then voting for him. If he doesn't do well, then voting for Trump