Elerond

And yet the UK opposes the death penalty? I guess not for children. I find the doctor's position on this difficult to fathom. They have the money, what's the problem? Unless the UK does not consider their child to really be theirs? It is case where they have come in conclusion that child can't be saved and keeping him alive artificially is just prolonging his suffering and therefore against his human rights. ECHR has decided that this is issue in which don't interfere in states decisions. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/charlie-gard-mitochondrial-disease-suffers-legal-battle/

Because it's something you just made up, not part of the dictionary quote you posted. Dictionary quote that is posted was ""theory" refers to scientific theories, a well-confirmed type of explanation of nature, made in a way consistent with scientific method, and fulfilling the criteria required by modern science."

""theory" refers to scientific theories, a well-confirmed type of explanation of nature, made in a way consistent with scientific method, and fulfilling the criteria required by modern science." "theories have lots of evidence and proof that they are real, but they are called theories because they focus in understanding how something works" How it is in contradiction of what I said?

It depends on use of word theory, as science for example theories have lots of evidence and proof that they are real, but they are called theories because they focus in understanding how something works instead of practical use of that something. No, they're called "theories" because they're not "facts". Any theory may have to be modified/discarded when new observations are made. Theories are adjusted if they don't predict what is observed. Also observations are checked, double and triple checked to limit error caused by people observing, inaccuracies in measurements, elements that observers didn't take in account and so on. But anyway they are called theories because they focus in reason instead of practice. Like for example theoretical medicine focuses on seeking reasons why people get ill and practical medicine focuses on curing people, which often go hand in hand with each other, as curing something without knowing what causes it isn't easy or practical approach and seeking causes of illnesses without seeking ways to cure them isn't necessary best use of the resources. Quoting dictionary here "In modern science, the term "theory" refers to scientific theories, a well-confirmed type of explanation of nature, made in a way consistent with scientific method, and fulfilling the criteria required by modern science. Such theories are described in such a way that any scientist in the field is in a position to understand and either provide empirical support ("verify") or empirically contradict ("falsify") it. Scientific theories are the most reliable, rigorous, and comprehensive form of scientific knowledge, in contrast to more common uses of the word "theory" that imply that something is unproven or speculative (which is better characterized by the word 'hypothesis'). "

It depends on use of word theory, as science for example theories have lots of evidence and proof that they are real, but they are called theories because they focus in understanding how something works instead of practical use of that something.

Lack of console version was question of prioritizing resources and Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 slacking capacity to do things that Obsidian wanted to do (mostly because they don't have enough memory). Xbox One and Playstation 4 removed capacity problems if you don't count controls as game control isn't optimal for PoE style gameplay and that is problem that never goes away. And resource question went away as console version is made by different company with their own money, so this console port will not only not eat Obsidian's resources to make other games but actually it can give them more resources as they as IP owners probably will profit from the port.

People also often underestimate how important local elections are. As city and state governances can have very big impact on how your everyday life will go.

What are you talking about? The police show up to a crime scene, collect physical evidence (including your DNA), and run it through the database. BINGO! Ben No.3 left a hair behind whilst robbing the German equivalent to 7-11 (probably called 8-25 cause they work so hard) and they can roll right up to his residence and slap the cuffs on. Problem is in partial DNA matches which can cause unfounded suspicions, which can in bad day lead in imprisonment of wrong person because they can't afford to defend themselves.

Veto power over new federal laws is quite significant power, although Germany's presidents usually use it only to prevent laws that they think are in violation of constitution and it has been only used eight times total by all the presidents I think.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-hotel-received-270-000-from-lobbying-campaign-tied-to-saudis-1496700739 President Donald Trump’s Washington hotel received roughly $270,000 in payments linked to Saudi Arabia as part of a lobbying campaign by the Gulf kingdom against a controversial piece of terrorism legislation last year. The payments—for catering, lodging and parking—were disclosed by the public relations firm MSLGroup last week in paperwork filed with the Justice Department documenting foreign lobbying work on behalf of Saudi Arabia and other clients. As part of a lobbying effort against the bipartisan Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act, or JASTA, Saudi Arabia’s Washington lobbyists and consultants spent approximately $190,000 on lodging, $78,000 on catering, and $1,600 on parking at the Trump International Hotel. The Daily Caller website first reported on the payments. Mr. Trump last month made Saudi Arabia the first stop of his first international trip as president, and described the country as a key ally in the war on terror and an important partner in bringing peace and stability to the Middle East. Saudi Arabia has been lobbying against JASTA, a law that was passed by Congress over former President Barack Obama’s veto. It allowed Americans to sue foreign governments over terrorists attacks. The payments to the Trump Hotel were made by one of MSLGroup’s subcontractors and reimbursed by the Saudi government, according to Michael Petruzzello, an MSLGroup executive. They were part of a lobbying campaign bringing American military veterans to Capitol Hill to advocate against JASTA, he said. All the hotel spending took place between Nov. 2016 and Feb. 2017, according to Mr. Petruzzello. Most of the payments to the hotel were made before Mr. Trump was officially sworn in as president, but some were in late January and early February—after Mr. Trump became president. Survivors and families of victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks have been pushing for the law so that a lawsuit can proceed against Saudi Arabia for any alleged role in the attacks. The kingdom has denied any involvement and U.S. officials have backed that position. Ethics officials have raised questions about foreign government payments to the Trump Organization. Watchdog groups say the Trump Organization’s business with foreign entities, in particular governments that book rooms or events or other business at the Trump International Hotel near the White House, risks violating a constitutional provision that bars federal officers from accepting payments or gifts from foreign countries without Congress’s consent.

If you say so. I disagree. Do you even know what you are disagreeing with?

Nice try: http://madworldnews.com/finland-muslim-refugees-condition/ http://www.barenakedislam.com/2015/09/26/finland-sucks-say-muslim-illegal-aliens-we-are-going-back-to-sweden/ http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/08/26/finland-after-15-muslim-invaders-brutally-beat-up-a-young-finnish-man-with-metal-bars-the-finns-fight-back/ https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7559/finland-migrant-crisis https://sputniknews.com/europe/201701131049566630-finland-islam-radicalism/ If those links are only rebuttal or proof of dissent then I would come conclusion that things here are in excellent condition

By looking how Muslim members of our parliament have voted / campaigned on these issues All the Muslims in our parliament campaigned for equal marriage and adoption rights for homosexuals (Interesting note our "Christian" members of parliament agree with sentiment that homosexuality is unacceptable way of life) All the Muslims in our parliament oppose idea that sharia law is above our national law. (Interesting note, our "Christian" members of parliament constantly quote Bible to over rule our national laws) All the Muslims in our parliament oppose idea of segregation of men and women or that women should cover themselves if they don't want (Interesting note some of our "Christian" members of parliament think that women and men should not mix and they are meant to do different things in the life, like women should be in home taking care of the children) All the Muslims in our parliament oppose honor killings and are most active members in campaigning for harsher punishments for those that do such things All the Muslims in our parliament campaign for stricter hate speech laws and speak against hate speak and violence against Jews. (Interesting note some of the our "Christian" members of parliament campaign for deportation of Muslims, Jews, Polish, Russian and all the other people they don't like) All the Muslims in our parliament are strictly against all sort discrimination towards homosexual let alone supporting killing them (Interesting note there has been "Christian" members of our parliament that have said that our constitution should have exception that allows killing sodomites) All the Muslims in our parliament oppose all sort of killing regardless of reasoning. (Killing in name of Jesus and Finland is seen acceptable thing to do in some circumstances by quite lot of people) Of course they come from most liberal segments of our Muslim population

Ares

We need to regulate cyberspace - May Speaking after chairing a meeting of the government's emergency committee Cobra, the prime minister also spoke about the need to deal with terrorism, saying the UK needed to work with international leaders to shut down areas of the internet used by terrorists to communicate. Mrs May said there needs to be an international agreement to "regulate cyberspace" where extremists have "safe spaces". We cannot allow this ideology the safe space it needs to breed. Yet that is precisely what the internet, and the big companies that provide internet-based services provide.

Wonder Woman was good, it gives hope that DC is finally realizing what makes good super hero movie, although they again have massive CGI final battle so minus points from that.

Technically he united EU leaders to think that USA is hostile state That's great. Anyone that is hostile towards the IV Reich is a good guy. It's good to hear that Isis and other rapists, child killing murders are now good guys

Technically he united EU leaders to think that USA is hostile state

I must say that I disagree in funding part, as in my opinion publicly funded TV can excellent competition to commercial channels if its is managed and supervised independently from the government. Of course there is constant risk of government influencing how it operates, which is the reason for independent supervision. Like for example how CEO of our national broadcasting company had to resign, because he first intervene how said company's newsroom write about our prime minister and then said that he don't need to listen the supervising body that checks that they follow ethical journalistic code. PS. I find it bit surprising that PBS has smaller operational budget than our national broadcasting company.

yeah, the problem is, why are we even there in the first place? In past 15 years it has mostly been to fight terrorism, which ironically has increased amount of terrorism and terrorists (at least most radical form which is the thing seen in the news). The only campaign against 'terrorist' was the Afghan one - and it had some ups and downs, but overall the propaganda target was achieved. Other campaigns led only to removal of safety barriers in the region... You forget that also Iraq war and Libya's intervention were partially justified with claims that Saddam and Gaddafi give support for terrorist and also in both of them propaganda target was achieved. Then there are constant drone strikes against possible terrorist targets. And now there are the fight against ISIS, strikes in Somalia, support operations in Nigeria, supporting Saudi Arabia's operations in Yemen and so on. And then there are home front hunt of terrorists and constant increase in security and ways to spot terrorist in internet and so on. Countries have spent trillions after trillions in fight against terrorism in only to claim that there is more terrorism in world than ever and even bigger need for new operations and new security measures.

yeah, the problem is, why are we even there in the first place? In past 15 years it has mostly been to fight terrorism, which ironically has increased amount of terrorism and terrorists (at least most radical form which is the thing seen in the news).

Efficiency is the wrong word, but rather quality and creative impulses. Still only seeing an assertion with no proof. I can not offer any personal story, but pretty much high marks music, art and litterature (Milton's Paradise Lost, The Beatles, Van Gogh, Tolstoy's Anna Karenina, T.S. Elliot, etc) were made during times when the artists were depressed or suffered. Anti-depressants as such alleviates such strong emotions required for a work of artist to be as visceral as it is. It doesn't shut the door to the dark inner world, but it muddles it's meaning to something grey not worth allocating to an idea. That being said, it works wonders on people who need it to be able to work everyday work. Artists stories are often big part of their work, which is why those artists that are known by everybody often have quite colorful lives. But also suffering is relative, like for example Van Gogh, one could argue that he was artist suffering from mental illness that drive him to self destruction and self harm who sold only one painting during his life. But he was also man who didn't actually earn a cent during his life and was still able to travel around Europe, go to brothels, bars, and so on regularly, because his life was paid by others who for various reasons supported his hippy life style. And there is also artists like Picasso, who found their greatness and thing that marks them in history books after they have gained fortune and good life. As Picasso become rich with good quality portraits other paintings, but he is remembered by painting style that he invented after he was already rich and respected artist. And there are artist like Tolkien whose path to world fame was in middle of suffering and good life. Tolkien fought in WWI, which is the suffering part, but then he was respected English professor with steady income that let him to write books that he wanted to write.

Quite lot Trump supporters seem to be quite generous and are willing to take even 700% increase in their premiums in order to give mainly Clinton voters cuts in their premiums.

Okay? Obamacare had failed and had to be voted on what like 54 times in under 4 years before it passed. Weren't those 54 votes by House of Representatives to repeal the Affordable Care Act either in full or in part.

Again, that's a blatant lie. The narrative was from the Fake News newspaper that Trump LEAKED a CLASSIFIED information he SHOULDN'T. The libtards claiming that US president shouldn't have contact with Russia are comical. The libtards claiming that intel shouldn't be shared with allies in a war are comical. The libtards claiming that AMBASSADOR is not a person who you inform when you want to pass intel to an ally are comical. But I guess that everything will fly as long as the outrage at the president doing what he should do would cover the fact that DNC killed a man because he leaked info on them to Wikileaks. HA! Good Fun! These are all false statements HA! Good Misleading