kumquatq3

In it I can hide behind a object, move a litle to the side, fire and move into cover again without being hit as in "real time" it becames a matter of how fast my reflexes are. Right, by eliminating the reflex portion of combat, it allows combat to be broken down in to two things: players tactical choices and his characters stats. RT combat can limit the amount a characters skills actaully matter.

Feb 15 I didn't see another site that did this, but we'll see

is the arguement that TB or Iso is outdated. Either way thats retarded

isn't this fun?

Only my mind eh? Run over to any number of the FO/RPG communities and see if it's just my mind.

at worst, they at least seemed to be swinging for the fences

FO isn't Spellforce. They bought the rights to Fallout. I'd hope they did that for a reason, namely to make a third FO. Not "hey, let's mix and match things we like from other games with the FO universe!". Besides, FO is, and should be, the opposite of twitch combat. Say what you want, but no matter how you dress it up, RT still depends on twitch combat.

There is a theory that the game might function in over the shoulder or fp, but the camera swings out to 3/4 for TB combat. Heres hoping.

Link My favorite role of his was when he play JFK in Bubba-Ho-Tep. RIP.

Everytime I remember this is going to be a console game too my hopes come crashing down. You have to wonder what effect that will have. Time will tell I guess, but for now I'm just not excited.

While I assumed controls would be different and you can pull better graphics than the box on the pc, I don't see how banter almost single-handedly saves the game. I saw this tho, it amuses me: LINK

there shouldn't be a big difference, in terms of gameplay. yea, thats right tho, K2 for the box had the demo on it right? So why didn't you like it.

FO 1 or 2. I played FO2 before FO1, so it's not that big of deal, in terms of order.

A THREE FROM IGN? Did one of the devs on the game kill the ign company dog or something?

I know thats an opinion, not a statement of fact, but damn are you wrong

I LOVE that game. They said there would be a sequel a while back, but we will see, it failed to sell particularly well as I understand it. http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/freedomf...reedom+fighters

like fight club says: when interplanatery exploration kicks off, it's going to be the corporations that name everything.

Apparently you can get lower than a 9 on ign

Well kumquatq, you have to think, its something unpredictable, but in the end you're right, I hope you have the time of your life <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ok, Nimrod, minus the fact that the radio pick up "Good Ridence" and played it in basically a loop, was a solid album. They changed it up quite a bit on that album and I think it's their best.

pick up firefly on dvd

it was good news....then it went horribly wrong

IGN again fakes journalistic integrity to bring you a hands on preview of the game

demo for it is out DEMO news

I'd like to point out that people are still rating people by just Dookie, it seems judging by opions in this thread, even 4 albums later. Look up a review or something

But they competed to get the rights to effectively end competion in specific areas. Hence now, competion is minimized. All you have to do is look at history to see the effects that generally has. Sports in general? No. But do you consider Madden and NFL streets as rival franchises? I don't. Do you consider the upcoming "Mario baseball" a threat to the High Heat series? and lets face it, anyone who tries to compete with a NFL or MLB liceansed product, in terms of having a realistic football or baseball game, is going to get crushed.