kumquatq3

Notice I didn't say everyone, or even a majority, but the truth is there would be less outrage if the sketch had been done as originally intended, with John Madden instead of T.O. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> 1. If you were trying to paste that label on me, **** you. 2. It would have been less offense to people if it was Madden, but largely because a fat guy was doing it. If you had the ex-fattie gumble (or is one of them still fat?), you would have gotten a similar reaction as Madden. I guess you can argue America has a problem with fat people being seen as funny and disarming. Plus, lets face it, how Madden and TO would have treated the part is a little different. Thats the main difference. I didn't particualry mind it, but I can see how people with kids did. To a degree, color plays into it, but I doubt to the degree you think. I think it's VERY VERY VERY sad that an athlete can apparently do anything he wants, short of having murder charges leveled against him of course , and I can't comment or I'm a "hater". **** that, I'll be a hater. I prefer my athletes to have a degree of down to earth-ness. A la Brett Farve, Micheal Vick, Walter Payton, Steve McNair, or hell, a Jeff Garcia to a degree. Just play the game right. By "right" I mean, don't argue with your coach on the sidelines, don't consider your stats as much as you consider actually winning the game, don't try too, on numerous occasions, to comment on the sexuality of your ex-QB (regardless of what it actually is), don't screw teams over because you don't feel you have to honor your contract, don't celebrate in the endzone like you will never score again, it's the superbowl, and you just scored with no help. Going out of your way to pull attention to yourself like that is pathetic, when you have a whole team that made that touchdown possible. Do all that out of respect for those who played before, and I have yet to see an old vet approve of the way TO plays (hell, deion sanders had his reservations, what does that tell you) But to sum up owens, I think I'll just use his latest quote: "God is healing me" Thats right, the man believes himself soooo important that god is healing him to allow him to play in the Super Bowl. God killed 160,000 with a tidal wave, but god wouldn't allow TO to miss the big game......

ALias is better that last season, but I'm not enjoying the "new baddie" every week for no particular reason thing.

Thats because your cursed with exceptional taste my friend. I know your pain. actaully, I'm in the middle of replaying BG2 (im in ToB now)

I just got caught up with Alias and Lost. And Locke is god.

I guess, but his mistakes ultimately killed them. Scratch that, his mistakes made sure they didn't have a chance. I have to wonder what Maddux does if they had put him in. I guess you have to wonder is it better to build Roes confidence for the future, or to give yourself the best shot to win.

no green text eyes bleeding

Yes, but to go back to my SC example, there are plenty of examples of TB strategy games. RTS and TBS play different and have a very different feel. So you can't really imagine making SC TB. Which is of course my point. To say, well other RPGs are RT so FO can be too, is too say other Strategy games are TB so SC can be too. At least, in my eyes. You CAN switch both games over, but it changes what they are.

If you think Obsidian isn't thinking up and pitching ideas for their own IP for awhile now, your retarded. The question is when it will happen.

I do. First, removing SPECIAL from FO would just be......bad As for TB, could you picture Zelda going TB or Starcraft going TB? Thats the kind of change that we're talking about in my eyes. As for the perspective......it wouldn't be the worst thing if it went away from iso, but I'd prefer it didn't. I prefer that perspective for RPGs. If it went to FP or over the shoulder, it would be nice if the camera could zoom out for an iso perspective for combat.

Yes, on the surface, but you are going to get strong underground rebel movements, as well as the general population being against you. So popular support should have turned against you, but the Death Star should have prevented uprisings in all but the worse conditions.

My god, as much as I don't want the Pats winning again, Owens must be prevented from getting a ring and defiling the trophy

I hope you can't turn her back. The dark storyline, where heros lose, is party of what made SC, SC

At least you got to use the Death Star, before some punk blows it up. <_< <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Hey, at least they got to blow up Alderaan before the Death Star went 'boom'. But seriously, what's the point of having the power to destroy planets if the result is, not fear and submission, but virtually every system in the Galaxy suddenly turning massively against you? If Rebellion weren't already a crappy game, that aspect of it might have been annoying. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> well, they turned against you is terms of support, you didn't nessasarily lose the planets I mean, it's not like people are going to be happy that you blew up a planet.

Eh, we'll see. It seems they are dropping money on the effects (they look decent enough), so I suppose their making an effort on this one. Hope the trailer was just a fluke, like they had to hire a 6 year old because they put so much money into the movie and couldn't afford anything else. BTW, anyone else seen the directors cut of Daredevil? It really improves the movie, aka it's good now.

If you mean Michael Chu, it's possible. Not that he would tell us. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> We have ways of making him talk ::LOOK AT THE CRAZY CAT:: now talk!

No, it seems more like Freedom Fighters, which makes me excited. speaking of which, there was/is a sequel to that game slated for late this or early next year. Last I heard on Gamespot

Well, iirc, one dev at Obsidian should have a pretty good idea if a SC2 is in the pipeline

yea, forgot about the secret level Seriously, whats the ****in hold up with SC2? I forget who owns Blizzard, but you assume they would be all over them for a follow up. All their games sell well, but nothing sold like Starcraft

Jim Raynor after Fenix dies: "I swear Kerrigan, I don't now how or when, but someday you're going to die by my hands. You have a good day now" I'd say it kinda sets up a sequel and I agree, WC3 was pretty weak. I played throught the single play campaigns, but got bored realllllllllly quickly on Bnet.

Fantastic Four Tim Burton's: Corpse Bride

Yeah, but is he hiring? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You will finally be able to get that face concealing helmet that you always dreamed of

the new pirates isn't 6 cds, it's 2 iirc.

I said it sounds like rebellion in a few ways Like you have a galaxy map with the rebellion and the empire and you select where you want to attack or build at. The Empire is a dominate force while the rebellion runs around in the out rims and such hiding till they build up their strength. You get heros that do battle or diplomacy. You build ship yards and training facilities. You carry troops on to new battles. You use troops to stop spies. actaully, this really does seem like a RTS game with rebellion tacked on.

I'm not looking for a tactical fleet sim *wonders if he should meantion that he kinda liked rebellion and yoda stories* *thinks better of it*

LINKY Actaully, almost sounds like Star Wars Rebellion in a few ways, just upgraded combat