Not really that practical where $$$ are concerned.
You get what you pay for, but when you pay 50-60 bucks you expect to get your money's worth.
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Exactly. I don't think that length of the game is and end all be all. A crap long game is much, much worse than an excellent short game IMO. Sure, I'd love for there to be an excellent long game, but I don't think developers should go about saying "Ok, we need to get 30 hours or else."
<{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'd rather have a 50 hour game that's decent than a 10 hour game that's fantastic... at least for 50 bucks.