Everything posted by BruceVC
-
Charleston church massacre
I don't often disagree with Obama but he is reading too much into this...he was saying " Racism is tearing our Democracy apart" No, this is incorrect. This terrible incident was just another one in a long list that have been happening unfortunately in the USA over the last 10-15 years that involve mass killings caused by normally a lone gunman. It seemed to start with Columbine and sadly there is nothing you can really do to fix unless you tighten gun control which has been proven it can't be legally implemented as the NRA and there supporters keep blocking it The difference with this attack was it was purely race motivated and he only targeted one race. This actually surprises me that it hasn't happened before considering the current gun culture in the USA . We have had several of these in South Africa
-
Charleston church massacre
States have strong identities in the US, no ? Definitely. They all have their own flags. Yeah, cute. But if the state and its people felt it was something part of their identity so not all that stupid. Interesting roadblocks they put up to stop it being taken down, though, well played. What did they say ?
-
Journalism and bias in the gaming industry
No. My issue is what I said it is. Is that there is no less and no more success than there was before. Yet they kept maligning the industry. Yeah they will disagree with facts. Which is exactly the problem. Its not a disagreement with the facts...its there subjective view Something else I find quite bizarre, there are at least 7 prominent gaming websites who have said similar things....yet you guys seem to think they are all going to just parrot the wrong information like they idiotic sheep. You need to give people more credit ...not everyone is as unethical and easily manipulated as you may think It's not just games journalism, look what the mainstream media is doing, courtesy of Conan O'Brien: In before "but that is not relevant!" that made me laugh..but I don't know any of those people so I have no idea how clever they are
-
Charleston church massacre
But you haven't given your reason why you think they are doing it?
-
Journalism and bias in the gaming industry
No. My issue is what I said it is. Is that there is no less and no more success than there was before. Yet they kept maligning the industry. Yeah they will disagree with facts. Which is exactly the problem. Its not a disagreement with the facts...its there subjective view Something else I find quite bizarre, there are at least 7 prominent gaming websites who have said similar things....yet you guys seem to think they are all going to just parrot the wrong information like they idiotic sheep. You need to give people more credit ...not everyone is as unethical and easily manipulated as you may think
-
Journalism and bias in the gaming industry
Bruce did you read what the post said? The point is that the facts on the ground have demonstrably not changed. So all the words that have been coming out of their mouths then and now are evidently not based on facts but on whatever bs emotions swirling in their heads. Which just makes it about the quality of their reporting and what this says about the worth of their analysis and critiques. Ethics in games' journalism. Like, yeah, for real. How did you arrive from that to assuming anyone has issues with gender equality as a concept. Lets try to be honest...this is about gender equality. Your whole issue is with them exaggerating the "success " of female representation at E3 and that's an aspect of gender equality. And I'm not saying you are opposed to this And I can only explain this one more time, those journalists said " E3 2015 was the best year for female characters" , in there minds this was accurate and they will report this on there website and people will agree. Just because that link disputed this doesn't mean everyone will agree with it
-
Charleston church massacre
Probably a good idea, whatever that flag stood for in the past, it just stands for racism. Even absent the connotations of racism, it's a flag celebrating treason. Okay then why does SC keep using it if so many people in the USA think its such a bad idea?
- Journalism and bias in the gaming industry
-
Witcher 3 - The women actually look like women.
That's some mighty fine logic here, hard to find any arguments. Sarcasm? Perhaps I should have worded that better. "There weren't really any stunning women. Except Morrigan." Better now? I understood your point, you were referring to there attractiveness from a Romance perspective? I have to think any character is attractive to Romance them...like Isabela and Viconia
- Journalism and bias in the gaming industry
-
What you did today
Ah, sorry if I came off as excessively snarky. I wasn't familiar with the idiom "segway" and one definition I found online was "non sequitur". I tend to insert my big bro sales pitch at every possible chance so I'm used to people lashing out with sarcasm. Wrong thread, bad post on my part
-
Charleston church massacre
Sorry Volo but I never even hinted at you being responsible for flags being banned....so you have clearly misunderstood my point
-
Journalism and bias in the gaming industry
No its not clear because you are ignoring context and the personal view, albeit wrong, of some gaming journalists They didn't lie if they felt this was the best year for female representation, you can say they are wrong like that link but you cannot say " they lied " It really shouldn't be such a contentious point..so what if this year was the year of the female character? What does that even translate to?
-
Journalism and bias in the gaming industry
So sure the industry was sexist just a year ago and today it's "E3 belongs to the ladies we are not giving it back" to quote one journo personality. Except the numbers don't really add up dear snowflakes. /journalism Guys this is where you view concerns me, you guys start to see things like gender equality in a negative light and exaggerate its influence So what if some gaming journalists are using a little hyperbole....they see it as a victory after years of battle around inclusivity in the industry. Let them have there moment in the sun...there is no reason to feel threatened or insecure I
-
Charleston church massacre
But come on Volo you know some flags and symbols are banned in certain countries, like the swastika. So banning a flag is not without precedent But the way some of the Southerners see it is they had family members who died and sacrificed themselves in the Civil War, so the Confederate flag is a tribute to there legacy. It really can have nothing to do with racism so I do see both sides It's possible that the manifesto isn't his but WHOIS says the domain was registered back in february. Could certainly be the handiwork of *chan trolls (hosted in Russia and registered under a proxy email). Smells funny, but I suppose that's to be expected. I'm still puzzled they haven't taken it down yet. Maybe being hosted overseas makes it difficult to pull the plug. No, I don't find it ironic, random people posting it on *chan illustrates precisely my point. If the mainstream media do what you suggest, people will go elsewhere for the juicy details. And then you'll get YouTube channels making monetised vids out of this stuff. I'm not against it in principle, I just don't see how it could be done. Fair enough. But there's still one level of barrier though. It requires active searching for those who are interested instead of it being broadcasted to millions. Personally I have no issue with this manifesto being in the public domain because then people can see just how dysfunctional this man was...and I am not even talking about the appalling ideological points he raises. Its full of egregious factual mistakes....the guy clearly wasn't very bright So the only people who will read it and think its clever and insightful would already be racist. Its not like it will convince new people to start a race war...surly people can't be that naive? Maybe i am too hungover to tell, but i didn't see any facts, only some personal anecdotes and opinions in the manifesto. Yes thats correct but then why are you worried this manifesto is easily available on the Internet...or did I misunderstand you ?
-
Charleston church massacre
Yes but we know for a fact that certain flags symbolize something and they get banned for various reasons ....the salient question here is " does the Confederate flag really represent heritage for some people which would make it non-offensive to them" ? I really don't know ?
-
Charleston church massacre
It's possible that the manifesto isn't his but WHOIS says the domain was registered back in february. Could certainly be the handiwork of *chan trolls (hosted in Russia and registered under a proxy email). Smells funny, but I suppose that's to be expected. I'm still puzzled they haven't taken it down yet. Maybe being hosted overseas makes it difficult to pull the plug. No, I don't find it ironic, random people posting it on *chan illustrates precisely my point. If the mainstream media do what you suggest, people will go elsewhere for the juicy details. And then you'll get YouTube channels making monetised vids out of this stuff. I'm not against it in principle, I just don't see how it could be done. Fair enough. But there's still one level of barrier though. It requires active searching for those who are interested instead of it being broadcasted to millions. Personally I have no issue with this manifesto being in the public domain because then people can see just how dysfunctional this man was...and I am not even talking about the appalling ideological points he raises. Its full of egregious factual mistakes....the guy clearly wasn't very bright So the only people who will read it and think its clever and insightful would already be racist. Its not like it will convince new people to start a race war...surly people can't be that naive?
-
Charleston church massacre
It's possible that the manifesto isn't his but WHOIS says the domain was registered back in february. Could certainly be the handiwork of *chan trolls (hosted in Russia and registered under a proxy email). Smells funny, but I suppose that's to be expected. I'm still puzzled they haven't taken it down yet. Maybe being hosted overseas makes it difficult to pull the plug. No, I don't find it ironic, random people posting it on *chan illustrates precisely my point. If the mainstream media do what you suggest, people will go elsewhere for the juicy details. And then you'll get YouTube channels making monetised vids out of this stuff. I'm not against it in principle, I just don't see how it could be done. Personally I am glad you posted it , I normally don't bother to read these types of things but I am glad I did as it reinforced all the reasons I am opposed to what he stands for And I need to discuss this tonight on that radio station I participate in
-
Charleston church massacre
Probably a good idea, whatever that flag stood for in the past, it just stands for racism. From what I have been reading I doubt South Carolina will take the flag down or permanently remove it. People seem to say it represents heritage and if that's what they really believe it will hard to change there minds ?
-
Charleston church massacre
What do you guys think about the request to take down the Confederate flag from Charleston due to sensitivity of the whole situation? http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/06/take-down-the-confederate-flag-now/396290/
-
Charleston church massacre
I see its not confirmed that he wrote that manifesto but it seems exactly the type of racist and uninformed diatribe he would believe..so it wouldn't surprise me if it was his garbage I had to force myself to read it
-
Charleston church massacre
How do you think the media should behave? I think they are reading too much into it Report the shooting as a tragedy, but in low key and in the same vein as when a kid have drowned. Absolutely nothing else. No name of the accused shooter should be released and no coverage of the trial should be done; deny the shooter any celebrity status completely. Okay well the suggestion of the media not making a big deal about this type of event is never going to happen for a variety of reasons, one of the main ones being there are sectors of the USA population that expect the media to make a big deal about it....anything less and I'm sure the media would receive major criticism
-
Charleston church massacre
How do you think the media should behave? I think they are reading too much into it
-
What you did today
O.O Dude, that's just inhumane...
-
RANDOM VIDEO GAME NEWS
That does me happy but its also just confirms my view that " that Romance sells and should be an intrinsic part of all RPG where you interact with your party ( this wouldn't apply to an action RPG for example ) " Romance really can enhance the RPG journey, I just wish most of you guys accepted and supported this notion