Jump to content

BruceVC

Members
  • Posts

    5766
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Everything posted by BruceVC

  1. http://edition.cnn.com/2016/09/26/politics/presidential-debate-hillary-clinton-donald-trump/index.html Huge debate tonight guys, the first of 3. Its going to be very exciting
  2. No you guys keep making that assumption, its wrong. I like Hungarian, Bulgarian and Ukrainian strippers I always say I dont get on with Russian strippers
  3. Sure, we all possess negative traits, and they all surface at various points. But what are the dominant traits for these candidates? Clinton seems to be dominated by greed and a need to be in control. Trump seems to be dominated by ego and condescension. Yes but we cant say Clintons natural personality of wanting to control her campaign and strategies means she will be like this if she becomes president "?
  4. volo Im not shallow., you can trust me on this
  5. They are all Marvel owned actors and were required to do this by a company. I don't know where your impression of me came from, but I suspect it's just a projection. I respect ambitious, hard working people if they want to earn money. I don't respect people who are selling themselves for money. Prostitution in any form is not respectable. My bad, I was under the impression you worked to make money as a real objective
  6. Yes it was well done, lets be fair now. I doubt anyone particularly cares what the actual celebs think I would prefer a celeb I thought was hot like Nicki Minaj telling me who to vote for but I still wouldn't EVER vote Trump
  7. It's sad what people are willing to do for $$$ Come on dude its actually a very good contribution that these actors have done I enjoyed it and its mostly true but lets not make it out that Trump can destroy the USA.. But they not getting paid for this as its a political advert But I'll be honest sharp_one I find it strange you have an issue with people who want to earn money? You do strike me as someone who will do basically anything if the money is there Hopefully we get to see that actor naked hey Sharp
  8. No She is trying to create a tough impression in the video but its suppose to be cliched and an imitation of Trump
  9. You make some good points in this post in a reasonable way, I dont always agree with your posts which is normal for any forum but I do appreciate the way you put effort into your views I noticed you never actually said " I live in country x " yet you have global views so I was wondering . When you first started posting I didnt think you would stay here long. I mentioned this to you, I wasn't being condescending just honest. I find it a little concerning we dont keep new members but end of the day if no one esle cares then I wont push it Also our first interaction wasn't very indelible in the sense you made one of those Internet platitude comments which never really impress me because I feel even if its Internet we can still debate normally. I made an incorrect assumption about you but after the debate around Iraq I realised you were much more knowledgeable than I thought and there was more to you than the impression I thought I am glad I was wrong because you are very interesting and its great you have stayed active How do you find these forums ? How do you think the members are and have people made you feel welcome. Now you probably an old Internet hand so you dont see a forum like this but I would be interested in your opinion if you will share
  10. Nothing unusual about what she said? You guys are just being captious Okay that is a terrible picture
  11. quid where do you live? I thought the UK?
  12. Nothing unusual about what she said? You guys are just being captious
  13. Okay I will admit I was very surprised by this, this part shocked me the most ....why is more not done to resolve these hardships? Who is responsible to transform the overall quality of lifes? Economic realities 80 percent of residents are unemployed. 49 percent of residents live below the federal poverty line. 61 percent of residents below the age of 18 live below the poverty line. The Pine Ridge Indian Reservation is located in Oglala Lakota County, where its per-capita income makes it the second poorest county in the United States, at $6,286. If the Oglala Sioux Tribe were to equally disperse revenues from the Prairie Wind Casino to all enrolled tribal members, each resident would receive $.15 per mont Health and well-being realities The infant mortality rate is five times higher than the United States national average. More than 4.5 million cans of beers are sold annually in White Clay, Nebraska, just over the border from the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. This amounts to more than 12,500 cans of beer a day. The reservation itself is dry. Obesity, diabetes, and heart disease occur in epidemic proportions on the Pine Ridge. Native Americans’ rate of amputations related to diabetes is three to four times higher than among the general United States population. Death rates due to diabetes among Native Americans are three times higher than among the general United States population. Unhealthy diets and lack of exercise are two main contributing factors behind these high numbers, despite the fact that in the early history of the Lakota, diabetes was virtually unknown. Life expectancy on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation is the lowest anywhere in the western hemisphere, except for Haiti. A recent study found the life expectancy for men to be 48 years, and for women it is 52 years.
  14. am not understanding the confusion. In other words he is saying more Native Americans are killed than AA....I find that hard to believe? is a per capita rate Yes but still, is homicide high in Native American communities? If this is true who is doing the killing of NA?
  15. am not understanding the confusion. In other words he is saying more Native Americans are killed than AA....I find that hard to believe?
  16. Am I trolling? You know that for sure? Is it not possible I could have other motives excect for this irritating, lazy, Internet colloquialism called "trolling " I never troll but in this case I'm joking with you, joking is not trolling
  17. I knew how this would upset you, this is EXACTLY why I didnt want you to read this link I have a suggestion going forward, I will read all political links and then tell you what is suitable. This way you will never get upset about a misunderstanding. So I will effectively be your filter for negative news....this way you can focus on what you enjoy which is gaming and let me provide you with stories that you wont misinterpret and see them as negative ? Its basically a win win for you?
  18. In other words are you saying more white people are killed by police in the USA than AA?
  19. But to be fair I thought that post was directed towards Gromnir so I didnt think I needed to read it. I should have read it, my bad But now your comment towards my question unintentionally demonstrates why I get frustrated and confused by some of the anti-Obama and anti-Clinton comments you guys sometimes make You are an intelligent person who has some real life experience, you made a very controversial comment and I asked you why you would think that, For me you must have a theory or reason but it doesnt answer the question in anyway to read that Webster quote because thats just a opinion that is subjective and could or could not apply in some circumstances I want to know your personal view
  20. No thats a simplification and dismissal of a social problem that does exist in some places in the USA There are real examples of police heavy handedness and racial profiling by some policemen in the USA, of course this doesnt apply to all policeman and there is real effort in many states to address this But what this has created is a reality where some people who are aligned to BLM will now embellish this problem and say things like " the police want to kill us " or " all police are racist " and of course these generalizations are untrue and unhelpful But this doesn't mean you can ignore the original issue of some police targeting African Americans unfairly
  21. what they "don't talk about" is not same as multiple instances o' obama calling for the creation o' a national police force. it simple ain't. again, Gromnir has concerns 'bout a national police force, and such a thing is unconstitutional regardless, but the claim you made is simple untrue. the issues you raise is valid. am even agreeing with some o' what you say. no need to muck up the water with mischaracterization o' obama statements. HA! Good Fun! I do sometimes take the liberty of boiling a topic to it's simplest terms. But I have to say you are one of the few members on this forum who will recognize you may be wrong or at least your comments may be misplaced due to emotion. This is a positive character trait Hold up here Bruce. I am only agreeing with Grom in that yes, I did intentionally over simplify my statement to you when I said Obama is calling for a "nationalized" police force. He is way too smart to actually say something like that, that is so obviously unconstitutional. But as much as I respect Gromnir, he's wrong. That is EXACTLY what the President and his admin is trying to do. If you take the time to actually read the documents and articles I linked the committee that commissioned the Rand Corporation study, was created by his administration is is ultimately answerable to him. And it's very obvious in reading their findings they are trying to justify the creation of something that has never existed. So yes, mea culpa on quoting Obama's speech but I stand by my assertion on what he tried to do here. Now this may all be moot. In 120 days we will have a new President. Congress will only be in session for 41 of those 120 days.Very little is going to happen between now and then.But it is worth noting for those casting a vote in a few weeks what the intention was here. What !!! Oh so you not admitting you were wrong....I assumed Gromnirs point had convinced you ? I admit I didnt read the links because I simply dont believe for one second that Obama ever wanted to implement a federal police force...you know why I am so adamant I am right? What would be his reason for this? Please be honest
  22. I hope Volo doesnt read this....he will have a field day expressing his horror at BLM being racist ...volo is very sensitive about these things
  23. Oh, thats a good point. It would reveal his true wealth...but I do think he is telling the truth about this because this is the type of comment that eventually comes back to you
  24. I see some forum members assumed this was about whether Trump had broken the law and this was a legal issue For me I didnt think Trump had broken the law but his tax returns are a very telling story around his integrity. He claims to have the business acumen to fix the economic woes of the USA because the USA under Obama has become inefficient and weak He is also a billionaire and even though he can find legal tax loopholes to avoid pay his fair share of tax if his tax returns revealed he was paying less tax than he should this would be a serious criticism of everything he claims to stand for ....again he would be revealed to be a hypocrite but this would be a much more serious accusation...." Trump isnt even paying his full tax and uses his business empire to pay less "
  25. what they "don't talk about" is not same as multiple instances o' obama calling for the creation o' a national police force. it simple ain't. again, Gromnir has concerns 'bout a national police force, and such a thing is unconstitutional regardless, but the claim you made is simple untrue. the issues you raise is valid. am even agreeing with some o' what you say. no need to muck up the water with mischaracterization o' obama statements. HA! Good Fun! I do sometimes take the liberty of boiling a topic to it's simplest terms. But I have to say you are one of the few members on this forum who will recognize you may be wrong or at least your comments may be misplaced due to emotion. This is a positive character trait
×
×
  • Create New...