Jump to content

pmp10

Members
  • Posts

    1031
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by pmp10

  1. 4 hours ago, Lexx said:

    I saw speculations that there must be 1 bomb that failed to detonate, since there are 4 pipelines, but we only had 3 explosions.

    Also possible that this one line was deliberately left intact.
    That remaining NS2 line can still supply Germany.

    I bet that if other pipelines are stopped this will be the first one Gazprom will be willing to restart. 
    At a price of course. 

  2. 1 hour ago, Lexx said:

    But why would Russia do it in this case? Aren't those exact pipes for the transport between Germany and Russia? How would sabotaging benefit them here? Or are we still on the "Gazprom pretends there are real issues for not delivering gas"-stage?

    They could have multiple reasons:

    • warn the west about things to come if they don't force Ukraine to the negotiating table
    • pretend to be the first victim of the upcoming pipeline ripper (definitely not the perpetrator, no sir) 
    • divide NATO with accusations and conspiracy theories (was it US? was it Poland?)
    • panic the EU markets to rally the slowly dropping gas prices
    • punish Germany for taking over Russian energy assets 

    And it's not like the pipelines were looking to be of much use in the short term anyway.

    Doesn't mean they did it of course, but the benefits are there. 

    • Like 1
  3. 37 minutes ago, Lexx said:

    I've heard two versions about it now:

    1. It was America, because they don't want Germany to drop the sanctions in the future, and

    2. It was Russia, because Germany wanted to re-purpose the pipelines for gas trade with the nordic countries (Norway etc).

     

    My personal opinion on the matter is ... I have no idea.

    We will almost certainly find out in time.
    If it's Russia it won't be an isolated case, incidentally Baltic pipe is set to open soon.
    If it isn't Russia the news will leak sooner or later. 

  4. 38 minutes ago, BruceVC said:

    What do you mean when you say  " their soft power has failed " ...

    I'll spare everyone another rant on making Russia a 'pariah state' or crushing its economy with 'unprecedented sanctions'.
    Suffice to say that all that careful escalation management resulted in Russian mobilization. 

    The sudden interest in security council makes me think that not a single thing has been learned.  

    • Hmmm 1
  5. 25 minutes ago, xzar_monty said:

    This can get quite interesting. Contrary to most other fascist states, Russia has made a concentrated effort to DEmobilize its citizens, not mobilize them, and it has been relatively successful in this: "the rulers" and "the people" exist in two different realms altogether, and these realms almost never meet (everyone knows there have been no real elections for quite some time, for instance, so "the people" don't even affect "the rulers" via that mechanism). Thus, a significant proportion of the population has been able to live thinking that the war in Ukraine has nothing to do with them.

    A mobilization will change this dynamic immediately.

    Realistically Russia would need only a small portion of their reserves, so that passivity need not change.
    Especially if they target the 'right' conscripts.

    Well, Putin is 2 hours late for supposed speech so either there are last minute negotiations or he is just recompensing all the waiting he had to do in Teheran.  

  6. Germany is taking (temporary) control of Rosneft refineries.
    Since the natural response would be an oil cut-off that sanction will come early.

     

    54 minutes ago, rjshae said:

    I'm speculating that type of equipment may come once the war is over, as it then becomes a "deterrent" in case of a renewal of Russian aggression.

    Sure but the soviet equipment Ukraine was given won't last thru a longer war of attrition.
    And there is a good chance that EU is already out of giftable T-72s.

×
×
  • Create New...