Jump to content

pmp10

Members
  • Posts

    1032
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by pmp10

  1. 2 hours ago, bugarup said:

    Poland does not need to "stake" anything, its security is dependent on Ukraine's survival, because Poland knows way too well what sort of neighbour russia is. 

    Precisely all the more reason to consider what happens if it cannot save Ukraine.

    On one hand - Poland runs a rearmament program that clearly shows lack of trust in NATO.
    On the other - a growing lack of military capabilities that will take over a decade to fill.

  2. 5 hours ago, Malcador said:

    https://apnews.com/article/ukraine-poland-russia-war-jets-migs-6d843ccbd50fef5f96091a5bff8f3e01

    Guess the MiGs may happen this time. Although, still not sure how useful these will be

    It's better than nothing given the Ukrainian air losses but at these numbers it just buys them a few more months of limited air presence.
    Politically US already announced it means nothing in regard to ever providing F16s.

    On a side note it was pretty funny hearing US praised Poland for 'punching about its weight' on Ukraine.
    The country is practically staking its security on Ukrainian survival and will be in serious trouble if that fails.

  3. 9 hours ago, Zoraptor said:

    No way was Bakhmut unassailable. It's a small/ medium city in a valley with a river running through it- better than what's behind it up to Slaviansk/ Kramatorsk but it was never a great defensive position. Now it's outright bad- high ground on both sides held by the enemy and most supply across a muddy field. Which of course also means the Russians shouldn't have so much trouble taking it...

    They mostly meant level of fortifications, apparently they have been steadily build-up since 2014 precisely to inflict sever losses on would-be attacker.
    Mind you, these impressions were given last year, some time before Lysychansk happened.
    Ukrainian morale was running high back then and judgments were overly optimistic. 

  4. 17 minutes ago, Lexx said:

    I mean, isn't it kinda Captain Obvious stuff that less elite units are dying in Bakhmut, if russians only send in the street meat? Once retreated, those same forces will still keep coming, just in a different place.

    Not just that but there is a very real chance that Bakhmut is as good as it get's for Ukrainian defenses.
    Some first person accounts considered the city practically unassailable. 

    Telling Ukraine to retreat without suggesting a better location to hold the line is of little help.

  5. An interesting summary of bombing strikes on Ukrainian grid so far - 255 infrastructure hits until today.

    As expected 80% of strikes were aimed at high-voltage transformer stations.
    Initially they were having strong effect too - the blackouts in Kiev quickly reached 50% level but it never got much worse.
    Seems the strikes provided diminishing returns which was opposite of what was expected. 

  6. Ukrainian drones are striking deeper into Russia.
    Supposedly energy infrastructure is now also being targeted.
     

    On 2/26/2023 at 5:23 PM, Mamoulian War said:

    Berlin denied today that such offer was ever offered to Kiyv.

     

    https://www.pravda.com.ua/eng/news/2023/02/26/7391092/

    Would you really expect otherwise even if it was true?
    Apparently similar reports surface in Germany.

  7. XI is supposedly getting ready to visit Moscow.
    Chances are a deal to support Russia is about to be made.
    I'm sure it will come at a reasonable cost to Russia. 

    Lines are slowly being drawn, I wonder where wester Europe will stand.

    3 hours ago, Malcador said:

    All these speeches are nothing burgers, so to speak. Biden's current one in Poland seems to be same.

    They are important symbols but that noting concrete was announced is telling.
    There are no more political plans for this war except to tough it out and hope you lose less than the other side.

  8. 11 hours ago, Mamoulian War said:

    In a very rare occurence, Russia and USA agreed on a statement, and officialy announced, that this news are not based on truth. 🤷‍♂️

    So Russia refused to sow discord in the west with fake news?
    I'll be a little more convinced once I hear official Biden peace plan. 

    In other news - Leopard coalition is not coming along too well.
    The 'over 100 Leopard 2 tanks' might turn out to not even be 50.

    • Haha 1
  9. A fascinating article about the visit of Burns in Kiev and Moscow.

    For anyone no fluent in German that can't be bother with translation software:

    Supposedly Putin was offered 20% of Ukraine (likely the part already held by Russians) as a peace offering but turned it down as not enough.
    Ukraine was also not interested, I bet they weren't offered any guarantees for the future.

    This fiasco resulted in a snap decision to send Abrams tanks which caught Scholtz unaware and finally cornered him in regards to Leopards. 

  10. 4 hours ago, Lexx said:

    /edit: Some of the video comments go into more detail of why Poland can't send the tanks (again, no idea how valid), so as usual it's not as black and white as it seems at first.

    Depends on how commited they are to spiting the face.
    The point was to force arms escalation, not get Poland into major trouble. 

    Of course it would win PIS some votes, so the temptation is always there. 

  11. According to Ukrainian intelligence the spring/early summer period will be decisive for the war.
    Makes sense as almost all major factors can now be predicted, except for the effectiveness of newly conscripted Russian troops. 

     

    7 hours ago, Mamoulian War said:

    @pmp10 some insights on possible Russian struggle to modernize/refurbish tanks.

     

    Sure, but that's the corners cut in pursuit of quantity.
    A lot of 'make-do' decisions have likely been made when industry was set on semi-war footing.
    Doesn't necessarily mean they will be far less effective with somewhat less advanced optics.

  12. 10 hours ago, Elerond said:

    Russia has not capacity to produce 170 tanks or 375 IFVs in 3 months.

    Not new T90s or BMP3s certainly, but by now they have mobilized the industry and are refurbishing T62s and BMP2s.
    So the best guess is they are capable of these numbers and maybe more by raiding strategic stores and cannibalizing mothballed hardware. 
    Chances are they can do this for a few years as well. 

    7 hours ago, Mamoulian War said:

    And looks like, that Baerbock “greenlit” donating Leopard 2s to UA by Poland.

     

    Word is that US got really annoyed at making demand for Abrams delivery too public, so this might be making amends. 
    Or maybe they just underestimated the pressure this would produce. 

    Either way we will see if that 'Leopard coalition' Poland kept talking about is actually real.

×
×
  • Create New...