While I may not agree with the free market, I think that a government regulated free market would be the best system. The system has been set for thousands of years, in order to set a new one you would need either complete agreement between countries or another British empire. So far the Venus project ideas seem a little flimsy.
The problem being of course that a government is just a s susceptible to money corruption as corporation.. Betting rid of this debt would be a very good start and an egalitarian society (even based on money) is a lot less likely to succumb to corruption. So I try to be as open about it as possible, but this current situation has to change. I'd support a bigger government if that's the only viable alternative.
I'm all open for alternative solutions or reforms to the current system, the problem with the alternative that the Venus Project suggest is resource based. They don't seem to have all the kinks work out on it yet, the problem is that a resource based system; as opposed to the current "scarcity" based system, is still a scarcity based system only in the reverse. Resources do become scarce and some are non renewable.
Men are corruptible but a least they are flexible, nature on the other hand can't be reasoned with or bended.