Orogun01

Which engine is that? Frostbite? I thought they were only using it for DA, any word that the new ME will be in Frostbite?

"This video contains content from FOX, who has blocked it on copyright grounds"

Kind of reminds me of this video

But isn't she already in 'canon' for the Avengers?Yeah, but I could see her as an Amazon more than I can Gal Gadot. Then again, they also cast Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor, so perhaps they are on some very hardcore drugs. Or they are really Jewish and looking for other really Jewish Jews?

That's cool as long as it doesn't handle like a methodone addict going through the shakes again. On the down side, looks like you're stuck being a ****ing human again. No playable Elcor no care. Firstly, what kind of moron gets addicted to methadone; shoot heroin pussies! Secondly, I kind of want it to drive terribly; those where fun moments before the tedium of going through another shootout on the same room as before. They should just put a warning, or make a public service announcement that someone is driving a Mako. I know why they are bringing it back, they are prepping us for their next release Grand Theft Effect.

I guess the rumors that she was training for the role were just rumors.

And along comes the search for the next successful video game adaptation and publishers have more reasons to fund cinematic movies.

Yep. I think it has already been said that is a bit redundant making a movie from a very cinematic game. Anyways, **** Hollywood for rewarding bad behavior.

I don't think there is a cover up, just a story that hasn't been given the attention it deserves by national media. I never said it was a cover I said that perception of the situation was being manipulated. It seems to me that there is some under reporting by national outlets.

You can always make your own homebrew edition.

I'm not one that believes in tribunal system, if you don't know by now that you aren't suppose to make racist or homophobic comments online I doubt some kind of player based court is really going to change that behaviour. Banning is the right strategy, this type of punitive step will get the message across Where has gone "education is needed to change social injustice on the internet" attitude of yours? Did you grew tired of polishing your white armor already? You know me, I never get tired of polishing my white armour But the reality is I have very little patience with some types of Internet behaviour If you ever make a software to reach through screens and punch people on the face I want to be your customer.

He was a correspondent for NBC who was there when the events happened and whose firsthand account they failed to broadcast as well as the removal of 2 different Tweets one of which said that the US defense had said that the bombardment was Hamas fault for not accepting a cease fire. Actual NBC coverage of the incident happened on the other side of the wall on Tel Aviv instead of the scene. The CNN incident was a lady (whose name I forget) that was doing a report on Israelis cheering while rockets where being fired and later tweeted about being threatened by them, I paraphrase "if you don't say what we want you to say we will break your car" she also called them pricks. After complaints from pro Israel groups she was called back. As for NBC, the higher ups are under scrutiny and criticism from members of the press for their actions and how the official reason Alyam was called back (safety concerns) contradicts them sending another reporter at the same time. It is known that this was a decision by higher ups. At the very least you can say that they are threading carefully and that they don't want to offend, ergo they are biased towards Israel.

Even with crunch time a month isn't enough time to get that much polish on the game, hopefully it was a publisher decision to push back the date closer to the holidays rather than because of a fault with the game. Because if its the latter we will probably see it on the final product and I kind of want this game to be good.

and that is one o' the problems... and why we asked which western powers. US only has one real ally in the middle east: israel. not only that, most amaericans, even with mounting casualties in gaza, support the idf actions. so, take US sanctions off the table for the nonce as they don't seem at all realistic. sure, if death toll gets too high, the US will threaten, by which time the idf will probable be moping up and preparing for the next major hamas conflict 2 years from now. HA! Good Fun! I share Gromnirs sentiment but also the situation is not as black and white as saying " Lets stop aid or enforce sanctions against Israel as this will improve the situation" The reality is Hamas is considered an Islamic extremist group, linked to other groups like Hezbollah, and almost all Western countries grapple with the problem of Islamic extremism. So no Western country wants to unintentionally empower any fundamentalist group by weakening Israel. And Hamas has been very provocative by firing the rockets So it justifies funding genocide? US has given support to terroris... freedom fighters before, they have no problem when it seems to suit their agenda; I guess they don't mind what their allies do as long as its not done to them. Personally I just dislike how media is treating this, by pulling out whomever dares report anything negative about Israel and how the West has taken a meek, consenting attitude towards the whole thing. It bothers me that these people could wipe out a nation and manipulate perception into making themselves the good guys. Do you really consider what the Israeli's are doing as genocide? Also how do you know the media is pulling out anything negative about Israel, do you have any links you can share about this or is this more your perception? Because in South Africa most people, outside the Jewish community, are very critical of Israel I was mostly referring to the US and in particular NBC and CNN this is the first link I found, I will try to remember where I read/watched the original report and post a link if I find it. I'm pretty sure that it was either Vice or the Young Turks. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/17/nbc-news-ayman-mohyeldin-gaza_n_5596268.html Anyway the thing is that bomb hits on a beach on Palestine in front of a hotel where journalists where staying and kills 3 boys. The reporter (Ayman) was staying at the hotel and had met the the 3 victims shortly before the incident. There was also a lady from CNN but I can't seem to find it right now.

and that is one o' the problems... and why we asked which western powers. US only has one real ally in the middle east: israel. not only that, most amaericans, even with mounting casualties in gaza, support the idf actions. so, take US sanctions off the table for the nonce as they don't seem at all realistic. sure, if death toll gets too high, the US will threaten, by which time the idf will probable be moping up and preparing for the next major hamas conflict 2 years from now. HA! Good Fun! I share Gromnirs sentiment but also the situation is not as black and white as saying " Lets stop aid or enforce sanctions against Israel as this will improve the situation" The reality is Hamas is considered an Islamic extremist group, linked to other groups like Hezbollah, and almost all Western countries grapple with the problem of Islamic extremism. So no Western country wants to unintentionally empower any fundamentalist group by weakening Israel. And Hamas has been very provocative by firing the rockets So it justifies funding genocide? US has given support to terroris... freedom fighters before, they have no problem when it seems to suit their agenda; I guess they don't mind what their allies do as long as its not done to them. Personally I just dislike how media is treating this, by pulling out whomever dares report anything negative about Israel and how the West has taken a meek, consenting attitude towards the whole thing. It bothers me that these people could wipe out a nation and manipulate perception into making themselves the good guys.

Maybe for the next game they will save time and just make a hump animation that spouts sexy one liners, so you can romance everything. It would be a tremendous time saver if they'll just let the autistic connect with whatever they want.

Yeah that's the point I've made several times, the IDF should have used a ground invasion from the beginning. Yes they would suffer more casualties but they reduce civilian deaths and allow it allows them to be more surgical I think you just gave the reason why they didn't do it, they really can't or won't allow themselves to get into an actual conflict where they could lose manpower. Its a kind of admirable forward thinking strategy, play the war today whilst preparing for the wars to come. I'm more concerned about the lack of action by Western powers, I wish I had a reason to explain why that didn't become a conspiracy theory.

Given the difference in both target audiences I'd say there isn't a conflict.

Your post is voiced in such a way that I can't tell if its sarcastic or not. God job on adding to my confusion!

Is that sarcastically?

I was expecting the forums to be more divisive on this matter but it seems no one is buying the story. Anyways, they'll probably say that the Russians tampered with the blackbox or something. The real question is whether or not the previous Malaysian airline incident was part of a false flag operation; to the Conspiracy cave! Na na na na na na naaaa.

It says it's Cobbie Smulders AKA "Robin" on the filename.

That's lovely, but I don't get it.

Fine, in order to bring this thread back on it's rail I'll ask the question; if DA:I is going to be more open world does that mean I can shoot prostitutes after sex to get my money back?

Is that Robin?