Orogun01

I did Does the game acknowledges or is the same "You sided with these people" even though you murdered them all afterwards?

Just throwing this question, can I kill everyone at Titan Canyon?

Video games should do whatever the hell they want. I disagree. This is a business, they are trying to sell a product. They should do whatever their consumers want. Indie developers have a lot more leeway, but they still have to think is terms of marketability at some point. Otherwise making games is just a hobby. Consumers are fickle and ignorant of the realities of development. Quality development with target demographic on mind and customer satisfaction, that's the way to go.

Now wait a minute! She brings up valid points like beating up women is bad and games should not condone violence, issues I had hitherto been thoroughly confused on. You mean when she goes out of her way to beat up women in games, to prove a point? Is like accusing a toy maker of perverting the minds of children just because you stuck a doll up your rectum.(Not specifically you though)

e.g. I didn't bump up awareness for my sniper. Two shotgunners. No one has toaster repair. Does it hurt knowing that Assault rifles are the best weapons ever?

You obviously don't know about mods.

Ahh, romance by the fireplace. Good to see BW influence spreading, among other things.

Everyone shut up and follow the almighty Marker.

Looks at avatar, seems familiar. Meh. Welcome back and good luck with your Tourettes, I hope you can be happy together. On the subject of Tourettes; the comedians have raised a good question: Why isn't there a nice version of Tourettes that just makes you say nice things?

I thought that the TFYC requirement was that you identify before entering the contest, IIRC they actually received question about anonymity from transgendered that didn't want to be outed.

I love the goats on this game, wish I could drag one all over the wasteland.

It is difficult not to be involved in politics, because many see not taking political stance as silent support for status quo. And video games have been part of several political issues and it rises such time and time again. So one could argue that games media that don't cover political issues don't do their job as good as they should. But I would also say that games media should look political issues from every point of view even when issues is banning/censuring/etc. things that are generally seen as bad thing by industry, consumers and gaming media themselves, because it is media's job to educate people about issues as comprehensively as they can. So media should not support single political view or be silent about political views, but instead cover all political views that they can cover. Addition to other things that they cover. But sadly main thing that gaming media does these days is to work as additional advertisement venue for gaming companies and even more sad is that seems to be what majority of readers of gaming media want (by looking most read articles in big gaming media pages). So one could say that biggest enemy for consumers are actually consumers themselves They are turtles that want to fly, gaming media is about gaming. Fluff for the sake of the writer rather than the audience, worse is that they are so obtuse that they have to look outside the industry for issues. Shows how much they know about what goes on or what should be considered problematic.

The failing is not with the journalists, is with the editors that allowed their sites to become involved in politics. We are learning that this isn't just in game journalism, but other kinds.

True, but how is this applicable to having an option to play as a male or female? You already read the answer to this question, when you read Shallow's post.

@Bruce: A diluted drink will never compete with a strong one.

Would you rather have a more inclusive game of lower quality or a higher quality one that's less inclusive? I like how all the people calling for inclusive games aren't the ones making them or financing them or doing something remotely to fix the problem. Too much talking without a plan of action, just ramblings. I don't want games to be more inclusive, I want them to be diverse.

You're not in the industry.

I just checked a bunch of stills from Conan. No marks on her eyelids that I could see. Are you sure you've seen one? She used to have a mole but she had it removed. Why???!!! why do people do that? and is never the ones with huge disgusting moles, is always the pretty people with the small ones?!!!!

Rest

Dear God, this game is a ****ing mess. Is like they took all the frustration of the old school crap and topped it all with tedium.

BTW does anyone know what the deal with Rachel Nichols beauty mark? The one on her bottom eyelid, sometimes is there sometimes it isn't. Is it real?

It isn't all that user friendly honestly. Learn to BBcode

Apparently the Mighty No. 9 has began censorship, speculation is already high about which community manager that was involved on a controversy is behind it.

Right now it isn't, other than Burch being very involved with the Bloggers and indie devs. More importantly, Polytron is working on a new game called "Where in the world is Phil Fish?" Edit: it may be because of this https://archive.today/mkcgB

If it was legit then there wouldn't be names redacted as they would be operating under an alias same as moot. All the janitors at 4chan have one and releasing it would had lent credibility as they are all listed on the website.