Zoraptor

Looks like the tutorial level from Kotor.

This is incorrect, odd as it may seem. For Jedi sex is fine- outside the context of a healthy adult relationship. "Jedi Knights aren't celibate - the thing that is forbidden is attachments - and possessive relationships." So yeah, canonically a jedi PC* ought to be free to boff all the Ishi Tib/ Gamorreans/ Selonians they like, so long as they don't care about them. ... To whoever made the observation; yes, the perfect jedi is pretty much the perfect sociopath. *[edit: at the time of TOR there was a theoretical ban on 'relationships', which can be interpreted as no sex. Seems pretty clear that it in that sense at least it was flaunted, given Bastilla's progeny]

And to reiterate, that is a constructed difference where two largely unrelated properties ('healthiness' and 'energy richness') are being conflated together artificially. A calorie is a measure of energy produced, nothing more. 'Healthiness' ('goodness') is how healthy something is. You can have healthy high energy foods and unhealthy low energy foods, they're not directly related concepts. I provided the direct quote from you, there was no nuance just a blanket statement. It's a worthwhile point because all too often it is precisely what politicians do, make sweeping statements like "Ban all X!!!!" without sufficient knowledge of what they're actually banning. It's good to see you acknowledging that there are natural trans fats and such now though, some progress is being made. If you'd done so at the time instead of propagating a bunch of rubbish like saying all trans fats are artifical and similar to heavy metals there would not have been any problem. No, it isn't. It's appropriate to say that they are 'bad' foods. No it isn't, hydrocarbon has a very specific definition, "In organic chemistry, a hydrocarbon is an organic compound consisting entirely of hydrogen and carbon" to quote Wiki's perfectly serviceable one- if you described a protein/ fat/ sugar as a hydrocarbon in a chemistry exam you would get a big red X through the answer. The most technically correct term for what you want is probably the nice catch all "organic molecules" though 'digestible organics' or 'biological energy sources' or similar term would probably be more descriptive. It's actually quite amusing/ unfortunate in a way, as hydrocarbon is just about the only family of organic molecules I can think of without a single significant use as a foodstuff whatsoever, outside of oddities like petrol eating bacteria.

It may well be so. If that's the case it should not detract from SP though, the more separate they are the less effect they should have. And as Gorth notes, UE3 is fundamentally MP friendly out of the box. I'm not particularly expecting large amounts of awesome from the MP in any case, just that it won't really effect the awesomeness (or not) of the SP experience. At this point it's probably a combo DLC purchasing driver and further encouragement to tie copies to Origin accounts as much as anything.

Protip: There's no such thing as a "good calorie" and a "bad calorie." Energy is energy. Protip: You're wrong. Protip: He's right. A calorie is just another name for (~ 4.2) joules which is just another name for energy. In the nutritional sense it is the digestible energy portion of foods, but it's still energy. The 'objective' measures for 'goodness' of calories are things like Glycaemic Index. I'll only deal with the more egregious errors in the rest of your post. No. I pointed out that your "ban all trans fats!!!!!" idea was stupid and unworkable; that you didn't know that there were natural trans fats; you didn't know that some are (apparently) beneficial; and that you didn't know some could be metabolised. Your attempt to wriggle out of the evidence of your own ignorance is noted, sadly without so much as a hint of surprise. To whit, from you: And, from me: Glad you read the link on vaccenic acid though (even if you missed that it was two separate links to two natural trans FAs), 'tis ever a pleasure to lift somewhat the dark shadows of ignorance with the bright light of knowledge, even if it is unappreciated and unrewarded. No, there is clearly 'good' food and 'bad' food. How the food is metabolised is far more relevant as 'good' food and 'bad' food can have exactly the same energy production value (calorie) yet be widely differing in apparent health effects. Hydrocarbons usually produce death in the body, what with them being poisonous and all. Fortunately most people don't ingest benzene/ butane et alia. :1440x900 smugface:

It means it shouldn't (yeah, theoretically) detract from the SP experience even if it sucks?

That is basically what he said, isn't it? The base point was OK, but it wasn't really a great way to make it, as by the missile measure neither bases in Cyprus nor Suffolk is worth anything. And if the enemy is in Suffolk they've got a hoard of extra, conventional options to use as well as missiles, and they can, well, base the missiles in...

Kaliningrad Oblast (East Prussia, as was) borders Poland directly, so it would be theoretically possible. Practically of course that is exactly the sort of thing covered by a defensive pact like NATO. I know you're exaggerating, but that's... a bit off even as an exaggeration. Losing Suffolk implies enemies a few quick and jaunty hours from downtown London. There doesn't seem much doubt that Crimea would actually prefer to be part of Russia as I've seen even people antipathetic to Russia admit that (and it was, up until Krushchev decided to do some Stalin style tinkering with the SSR boundaries). Can't say I'd be surprised if Belarus ends up being absorbed by Russia in the long term.

It's a defensive alliance, anyone who attacks one NATO member attacks all. That is about as close to insurance as you can get in international relations and there's no reason to believe it wouldn't be honoured. But that does mean there's as little obligation to support other members in elective wars as there is for Laos, Paraguay or Belize to.

Heh, I guess with the euros getting back into the colonialism game the turks are feeling a bit left out. Must re-establish Sultanate People's Democratic Republic of Rum. Ludicrous threat in any case, it's about as likely as us invading Fiji to get rid of Frank Bananarama.

Been ages since I played it but I do remember a few problems. Wasn't balefire itself an anachronism too, lore wise? Doesn't really matter, didn't bother me at the time and certainly doesn't now.

** Is there any news on any plans to release Disciples 3:Resurrection in the States? (or just in English?) Apparently yes, if you don't mind DD, and releasing today (!). Will presumably pop up on other portals eventually. If you haven't got the other 2 KB games laready they have a sale on them on at Gamersgate as well.

I presumed the 'wut' was at the 'was terrible' part, since it was a pretty decent game, at least for non die-hard fans of the books. There've been plenty of far worse adaptations.

New King's Bounty game. That makes three games I'm likely to pre-order in early 2012. If I don't end up pre-ordering BatmanAC that would be more than in this entire year.

Funny thing is that they guy/gal riding the bus to and back from a bad job, doesn't have the money, desire, skills or time to prepare a healthy meal. Costs half as much to live on decent food as fast food*, and takes about ten minutes to do as well- and that's from someone who doesn't live on bread and potato but buys choccy biccies, coffee, pork fillet and the like**. Not having a stovetop or fridge would be a good excuse certainly and no doubt living in a high rent area with low income can be a problem too, but for most people it's never having thought about cooking/ can't be bothered rather than genuinely not having the time, and especially not having the money. Anyone can cook, it's hardly rocket science, and there's plenty of stuff that'll take ten minutes or less of their time. More relevantly if they can't be bothered buying cheaper now a little tax based surcharge ain't going to change their behaviour, is it? Having it pointed out to them that they can be healthier for cheaper with minimal effort might. *Taking 2 x MaccyD's meals/day @5USD a pop, average grocery bill for two people 50-70USD excluding non foodstuffs. **And lots of vegies, since that list doesn't sound too healthy. Normally around four types of vegies per meal, since they're far cheaper than meat (or dairy) by weight.

Funny thing is, you actually can make a healthy meal as quick as and almost always cheaper than fast food, if you know how. That Doesn't Mean What You Think It Does or, alternatively I don't post rolleyes for no reason. It's not that vegetable oil produced trans fats aren't bad, of course. But what you are doing is making a blanket statement similar to "cholesterol is bad!!!" (cholesterol is actually essential to proper cell membrane function, and without it you will die) and only slightly better than "aromatic rings are bad!!!" (good luck living without 3 amino acids ++).

As an illustration of what I was saying, I'd call Al-Shabab and the like Taliban clones, not an AlQ franchise. They're primarily an armed militia that uses terrorist tactics on occasion- like the Taliban, or the (non-muslim) Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, for that matter- and whose primary aims are internal to their country.

Yeah, ban all animal fats, steak, mince, milk, butter, the lot. Everyone can get over it by popping some newly legalised tabs.

Sega's always had the trademark registration. The only real question was whether it was a System Shock type divided ownership situation or Sega owned the lot. The tweet doesn't definitively clarify that, but Sega owning the lot has always been most likely as it's pretty much industry standard for the publisher to.

OK, I really sounded like a prick there. Sorry Zor. No worries, I wasn't in the least bit offended anyway. I don't think I'll add anything further at this point since this is a fairly well trod argument other than to say that the main bone of contention is probably where the line is drawn at what constitutes AlQ as opposed to regional players like the Taliban. I have read plenty on AlQ though, but have little interest in a citation war.

Leading animation franchise and rumours of another KOTOR game? Must be KOTQRSLJYR based on the Clone Wars cartoon. Which would actually be quite a good idea, if done right.

They hate our freedom!!1!! was simplistic at best when GWB said it and it's still, at best, simplistic. AlQ was never an existential threat to the west. Never had the capacity. The only thing they've ever been capable of was, well, getting us to hit ourselves in the head with a frying pan while trying to swat the AlQ fly. Deciding to spend the last decade living on credit has done far more to erode the west's power than AlQ could ever dream of achieving. Fact is that there are rather a lot of people who don't hate us 'for out freedoms' but because one day Uncle Muhammad got blown up by a drone for being tall and having a beard. Generally such people aren't big on exporting the global jihad- which tends to be an embarrassingly middle class trend and from embarrassingly friendly areas- but they sure are keen on making a mess for 'our' interests and friends. And that's the primary reason why we've been months away from beating the Taliban, for the past decade.

I'm with you on that boat. Also the support for Settlers is abysmal, it's still plagued with the same bug it had from the start which makes the game unplayable on some hardware (textures flickering blue which leads to either app crash or driver crash within 5 minutes of playing, happens with both NVIDIA and AMD hw). Consider that they also delay the PC versions of their multiplatform releases and it does make you wonder exactly why their PC business has declined 90% while the PC is growing overall. Unfortunately given how poor Ubi are at communicating their DRM honestly (see: From Dust, where they ended up deleting their own forum posts detailing its DRM as they'd flagrantly lied about it) it's a matter of faith even on the odd occasion when their schemes are relatively sane.

Yes, and you could make similar arguments for a host of other things too. Depends on how you measure it as almost all studies are done by lobby groups one way or another. However, if wikipedia is to be believed smoking reduces life expectancy by ~14 years on average. Given the average life expectancy of, say, New Zealand (80.3 years) every single smoker smoker saves the tax payer around $140,000 in superannuation alone, which amounts to ~8 years tax for someone on the median wage, by my rough maths, and will have paid multiple 10ks in excise tax (it's now around $6.50 tax per pack, +17.5% GST on top, iirc). That's taking financial rationalism to the "best if everyone dies the day after retirement" extreme level though.

I think I've managed to find the point that I'm obviously not getting across at all (based on your post here and WUE's blatant strawman above). I'm NOT ****ING SAYING THEY ARE BAD! It's not a binary choice between God's Angels and, well, "bad". All I'm saying is that I don't think this "support" to be so wonderful, a golden standard for gaming companies to achieve given the circumstances. Now I understand that stances other than this game/studio/publisher sucks/is the best ever are uncommon on the Internet, they do still exist! OK, I'm happy to accept that's what you meant (and I always think I come across more aggressively than I intend anyway). To elucidate a bit better though, the problem is not so much whether you are antagonistic or neutral to their approach, it's more a question of what they realistically can do differently and whether it could even theoretically be done better. Seems to me that they have the three basic options I listed: only bug fix the PC version with zero additional content, charge for any improvements from xbox development or combine the two without the charge- assuming they wouldn't just abandon the PC version wholesale, of course. Given those options I think that it is clear that the best one for their customers is the one they have picked. And you really cannot ask for much more short of them... converting themselves to neutrinos and going back to May? So it's not just a question of whether any option is good in an absolute sense, just a question of which is best in the circumstances The PR thing is completely true, of course, they are in general very good with it and know how to massage opinion rather well. They're going to have all PC dlc free, awesome, but it just means that anything significant will be classed as an expansion pack (look PC gamers! we do proper old school expansions rather than nickel and dime you, aren't we awesome!) and charged for, of course. I expect that sort of thing from everyone though, it's just that CDPR generally has enough good will and has not mucked people around enough for most people to not object to it.