Wrath of Dagon

We don't know if it's the latest iPhone they hacked, do we?

General election match-up polls are normally meaningless at this point. However Trump's (and Cruz's) high negatives are significant. Kasich would be a very weak candidate but almost anyone can beat Hilzilla assuming her problems pan out and she's still able to run. I think if Repubes do steal the convention, they won't give it to Kasich anyway, it'll be someone else.

I bet you foreign guys are envious how fun our elections are.

Something else to be terrified of: http://www.statnews.com/2015/11/12/gene-drive-bioterror-risk/

If he was older he could've joined Soros in helping the Einsatzgruppen.

Shocking? I doubt it. Shocking yet not surprising. At least we got one rat: http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/03/18/rolling-stone-marco-rubios-signature-modus-operandi-has-been-to-turn-his-back-on-those-whove-helped-him-rise/

More on Hilzilla and NSA : http://observer.com/2016/03/hillary-has-an-nsa-problem/ Shocking corruption in Fed government : http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/17/senate-committee-demands-dhs-produce-whistle-blower-smear-documents/#ixzz43H6Wnm00

I'm going back to my original prediction that if Hilzilla wins Republicans will hurry up and approve Garland.

Well thats the one thing I think I do understand, you see how criminal activity in the Latino community is almost ignored and bleeds through to impact other Americans right ? My point is people come here illegally, which leads to a ton of other crimes. For some reason you think we should just let them, so I don't understand why you think democratically passed laws don't need to be enforced. "Latino" has nothing to do with it, there are illegal aliens from all over the world.

Bruce, what about the rule of law don't you understand?

To hell with free speech, which we all supposedly believe in : http://hotair.com/archives/2016/03/12/conservatives-align-with-black-lives-matter-in-rush-to-find-blame-for-chicago-protests/

WOD before I comment on this article what is your view on it? I agree with every word. I actually personally knew Spencer.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/13/father-son-murdered-illegal-pro-amnesty-john-kasich-marco-rubio-tried-treason/

I did. If Trump thinks a bunch of scrawny liberals disrupting his safe space is a serious danger than he's either delusional or a coward. Take that up with Meshugger then, he's the one who made it after all. They didn't look scrawny to me, looked like a bunch of thugs. If it was so safe, why didn't police remove them? The Weimar sentence wasn't in response to you, that's why I left a blank line.

It was Sanders supporters and other leftists disrupting Trump's rallies, I've never seen any Trump supporters trying to disrupt Sanders rallies. As far as cancelling, it was the right call, there was a near riot inside as it was, and apparently they were planning to rush the stage if Trump showed up. Sure, there are elements of people disrupting some of Trumps rally's But aren't people allowed to do that...freedom of speech and the US Constitution ? Bruce, you're hopeless. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you can deny someone else their right to free speech. The protesters outside the rally is fine, but they have no right to go inside the rally and disrupt it. Did you not see it on TV? People were fighting already even though Trump didn't show up. If he did it would've been a riot. What would people say if someone got killed as the result of him continuing? It was clearly not safe. Also, US is not Weimar Germany, the comparison is ridiculous.

Funny how it's always the leftists who get to be the hornets. The rally disruption was planned for weeks btw, which the groups involved readily admit. These are Occupy, Moveon and similar scum, they'll always find something to riot about. Couple more relevant articles : http://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/01/17/andrew-jackson-revenant/ http://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=6615

It was Sanders supporters and other leftists disrupting Trump's rallies, I've never seen any Trump supporters trying to disrupt Sanders rallies. As far as cancelling, it was the right call, there was a near riot inside as it was, and apparently they were planning to rush the stage if Trump showed up.

https://twitter.com/instapundit/status/708474426333986817

Trump the anti-nuclear activist: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_spectator/2016/03/trump_s_nuclear_experience_advice_for_reagan_in_1987.html?wpsrc=sh_all_dt_tw_top Interesting but very long, didn't finish. Scary eyebrows.

Misstated every possible fact. That's some kind of achievement. Anyway, I know who needs to be deported first.

Yeah, not quite ready to swim with the sharks.

WOD, this should be good practice. You need to prepare yourself for a lot a disappointments if Trump becomes the US president Problem is, the other guys are even worse. He quickly reiterated that he was talking about high skilled immigration and not about H1-B visas. Take it as you will. Politicians gonna politick and all that (thinking about Rubio and Cruz and how they increased the number of such visas). But Kelly asked him about H1B's, and he said he's changed his position. Also he said similar things about H1B's and Zuckerman before. Besides, he didn't seem to have read his position on his own website. It's forming a pattern now : http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/432347/trump-backs-increased-immigration Edit: Here's a similar view (where I got the first link), this guy I trust most on all immig issues: http://www.kausfiles.com/2016/03/04/harmonic-convergence-of-paranoia/

Trump seems to have changed his position now in favor of H1-B visas, very disappointing.

The latter is more likely to be a troll than the former, these days... I'm quite sure Trump will win. GOP was far too late and far too divided in organising itself to attack Trump seriously, when they should have organised their richest donors and heaviest weights to assassinate his character a long time ago. The only remaining option, especially now after tuesday results, is to basically game the system, prevent his 51% and then have delegates pick - a move that would be almost as scandalous as a Trump nomination itself (not because it's new but because it's so blatant). Seeing how you're a moderator, may be you should do something about the insult instead of quoting it. I think Trump paid Romney to attack him. I just found the running mate for Trump: http://www.texastribune.org/2016/03/02/newly-elected-gop-chair-texas-capitol/

Every incumbent Republican Congressman that was challenged in the Texas primary won, very depressing. Business interests have a complete lock on Congress, it wouldn't even be worth voting if not for the presidential election.