Wrath of Dagon

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/03/13/father-son-murdered-illegal-pro-amnesty-john-kasich-marco-rubio-tried-treason/

I did. If Trump thinks a bunch of scrawny liberals disrupting his safe space is a serious danger than he's either delusional or a coward. Take that up with Meshugger then, he's the one who made it after all. They didn't look scrawny to me, looked like a bunch of thugs. If it was so safe, why didn't police remove them? The Weimar sentence wasn't in response to you, that's why I left a blank line.

It was Sanders supporters and other leftists disrupting Trump's rallies, I've never seen any Trump supporters trying to disrupt Sanders rallies. As far as cancelling, it was the right call, there was a near riot inside as it was, and apparently they were planning to rush the stage if Trump showed up. Sure, there are elements of people disrupting some of Trumps rally's But aren't people allowed to do that...freedom of speech and the US Constitution ? Bruce, you're hopeless. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you can deny someone else their right to free speech. The protesters outside the rally is fine, but they have no right to go inside the rally and disrupt it. Did you not see it on TV? People were fighting already even though Trump didn't show up. If he did it would've been a riot. What would people say if someone got killed as the result of him continuing? It was clearly not safe. Also, US is not Weimar Germany, the comparison is ridiculous.

Funny how it's always the leftists who get to be the hornets. The rally disruption was planned for weeks btw, which the groups involved readily admit. These are Occupy, Moveon and similar scum, they'll always find something to riot about. Couple more relevant articles : http://www.the-american-interest.com/2016/01/17/andrew-jackson-revenant/ http://thezman.com/wordpress/?p=6615

It was Sanders supporters and other leftists disrupting Trump's rallies, I've never seen any Trump supporters trying to disrupt Sanders rallies. As far as cancelling, it was the right call, there was a near riot inside as it was, and apparently they were planning to rush the stage if Trump showed up.

https://twitter.com/instapundit/status/708474426333986817

Trump the anti-nuclear activist: http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_spectator/2016/03/trump_s_nuclear_experience_advice_for_reagan_in_1987.html?wpsrc=sh_all_dt_tw_top Interesting but very long, didn't finish. Scary eyebrows.

Misstated every possible fact. That's some kind of achievement. Anyway, I know who needs to be deported first.

Yeah, not quite ready to swim with the sharks.

WOD, this should be good practice. You need to prepare yourself for a lot a disappointments if Trump becomes the US president Problem is, the other guys are even worse. He quickly reiterated that he was talking about high skilled immigration and not about H1-B visas. Take it as you will. Politicians gonna politick and all that (thinking about Rubio and Cruz and how they increased the number of such visas). But Kelly asked him about H1B's, and he said he's changed his position. Also he said similar things about H1B's and Zuckerman before. Besides, he didn't seem to have read his position on his own website. It's forming a pattern now : http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/432347/trump-backs-increased-immigration Edit: Here's a similar view (where I got the first link), this guy I trust most on all immig issues: http://www.kausfiles.com/2016/03/04/harmonic-convergence-of-paranoia/

Trump seems to have changed his position now in favor of H1-B visas, very disappointing.

The latter is more likely to be a troll than the former, these days... I'm quite sure Trump will win. GOP was far too late and far too divided in organising itself to attack Trump seriously, when they should have organised their richest donors and heaviest weights to assassinate his character a long time ago. The only remaining option, especially now after tuesday results, is to basically game the system, prevent his 51% and then have delegates pick - a move that would be almost as scandalous as a Trump nomination itself (not because it's new but because it's so blatant). Seeing how you're a moderator, may be you should do something about the insult instead of quoting it. I think Trump paid Romney to attack him. I just found the running mate for Trump: http://www.texastribune.org/2016/03/02/newly-elected-gop-chair-texas-capitol/

Every incumbent Republican Congressman that was challenged in the Texas primary won, very depressing. Business interests have a complete lock on Congress, it wouldn't even be worth voting if not for the presidential election.

And your vote doesn't matter anyway, right? The delegates are uncommitted? Edit: Sorry, I think that's only the Republicans.

They come on an airplane and overstay their visas. Last year over half a million people overstayed. I'm guessing most of them weren't from first world countries.

I don't know breakdown by country, but Bruce was talking about Africa in general.

You guys are funny But it does matter, the views of your average South African will be generally echoed throughout the African continent Surly misplaced perspectives about the USA from a whole continent ....thinking how racist the USA is should concern you Patriotism Barti...patriotism Barti. It should matter if Trump is creating a very bad impression around the USA and its citizens? Do you think they'll start to think of us so negatively they'll stop coming here illegally?

Saw this brilliant post on twitter: Karen Santal ‏@KSantal · 16h16 hours ago @ThePlumLineGS Yes, they will love GOPe plans to whack SocSec and Medicare for more wars like idiot "W" started. Edit: Republican bloodsuckers -er- establishment in a huge panic, they might lose their bacon forever : http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/donald-trump-republican-party.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0 Edit2 : How Rubio co-opted conservative media on amnesty : http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/marco-rubio-pushed-for-immigration-reform-with-conservative-media.html Lech Walesa turned out to be an informant for the communist government, proving once again you can't trust anyone.

WOD do you hunt in Texas? I mentioned to you how I met several Texas hunters in SA....hardcore guys, real outdoor survivalists. The type of people who could live in the wilderness if necessary No, the most I'm willing to kill is a mosquito or a fly.

Are you going to take a chance on Democrats appointing the next Supreme Court justice? And before you say Trump will appoint a liberal any way, remember when GWB tried to appoint Harriet Myers, and the whole conservative base went nuclear. Yes but the outcome will still be secretive, unless you saying the outcome will become public record later? There's no way they'll be able to keep something that important secret, trust me on this. We'll know what FBI recommends, one way or another.

He plays well to the disenfranchised party base. He hits all their buzzwords and topics and seems like he'd be WoD's personal favorite for "never ever EVER give anything away!". It's no surprise that he's winning the party where voter base considers getting 99% of what they want an utter failure. The thing is he'll either wind up against Hillary who's moderate enough she could probably catch several of the voters who feel Trump is to insane to vote for, while also getting the consistent democratic majority (in recent years/last decade) of the youth vote in a situation where many would turn up simply NOT to see Trump attain presidency. Or he'd be up against Bernie, who's activated the disenfranchised liberal base and would probably be able to get the entire party behind him because (as of right now) the democrats are significantly better organized than their opponents. You right. The sad thing is the party base is disenfranchised because the elected politicians go to Washington and become big government liberals. They are nearly indistinguishable from the Democrats except on the odd social justice issues they feel offers the opportunity to "throw the base a bone". Now in response to that disenfranchisement the base is supporting a man whose few policy admissions favor big government authoritarianism and who has been pretty left of center on almost all his public utterances over the years. This is a classic example of cutting off your nose to spite your face. Republican competition isn't about liberal vs conservative any more. It's about corporatist globalists vs populist nationalists. Granted Trump has a lot of faults but he's all we got.

@Bruce It's not anti-Clinton propaganda, it's an objective article. We don't know if she's vindicated or chastised because the investigation isn't finished yet, which is also a reason no one will talk on record. That's how journalism works here, I don't know about SA. And what "campaign" are you talking about, this is about top secret documents which were improperly sent over public internet to a private non-secure server.

Why is Reuters writing an article about something that has "no substantive evidence"? Obviously they have sources which are credible. My opinion doesn't matter, it's the FBI's opinion which will matter once they finish their investigation.

Players generally like a variety of enemies, not just fish people. It's a video game, not a short story. I think they actually planned to make the game much bigger, with multiple detectives, but it was the developer's first game and they got over-ambitious, which is part of the reason they didn't survive. Also Bethsoft did so little promotion a lot of gaming websites didn't even know the game was released.

So you read that article and you got the impression she is a felon a thousand times over? "However, the agency reports found some emails included passages that closely tracked or mirrored communications marked “top secret,” according to the sources, who all requested anonymity. In some cases, additional classification markings meant access was supposed to be limited to small groups of specially cleared officials. Under the law and government rules, U.S. officials and contractors may not transmit any classified information – not only documents – outside secure, government-controlled channels. Such information should not be sent even through the government’s .gov email network." At least 22 emails had info from documents marked "top secret" or above. Over a thousand emails with some level of classification sent over the public internet. Each instance of mishandling classified info is a felony. Don't worry. I am sure that bombing Texas is quite low on the God-Emperor's list. I think GD lives in Tennessee. Definitely not in Texas.