I want teh kotor 3

There are no good MMOPOS's, so tere are therefore no "best".

But fans will help. Or you could go overboard and do water cooling, etc. but that's just overkill.

I'm too lazy to type out a full response (avoinding the expenditure of ATP is one of my main goals ) , but I'll say that, again, emotions- chemicals= words. You people are blowing this **** way out of proportion.

Sombody should have warned me there was an age requirement then. As to the Crawl (and music), it's simply a Star Wars staple. It ain't really Star Wars without it. And again, My 4 and 7 year old kids were bored outta their minds. About the crawl, I agree with you. But I actually liked the movie. Mostly because it didn't involve essays. Or history. Or thinking.

Either Zannah's crusier or the Deathstar.

MMO's inherently suck when =they're trans-genred games, like WoW or K3 are, so I don't see what potential you see. I love Bioware's games, but if BLizzard couldn't redeem it, no one can.

Yep. Same here. Me three. It's called EA.

How 'bout k3 not being a MMO?

But that would be too inherently worth watching (usually) to be a chick flick.

You tell that to the CS and Starcraft crowds. I guess they are doing it wrong, too. No. Playing an RTS with a computer is kinda stupid, because computers are kinda stupid and don't react. RPGS, on the other hand (and I don't count MMO's as RPGs, just POSs), are meant to be played against AI.

Yeah, it isn't a game, therefore there shouldn't be a "G". Or the 'RP" either. In fact, "POS" would do admirably.

I refuse to play a MMOPOS.

Chick flicks deserved one of these to the head. They fail.

You're dead meat Sartre

Basically. The entire human race is just a bunch of chemicals. That doesn't invalidate our experiences. Never said it did. I'm just pointing out that its just chemicals, same as all emotions. Aahh, speaking like me when I was 15. Chemical - or should I say biological considering the complexity of living systems - basis for love is very different thing from love itself. Just like consciousness isn't identical to brain nor is our experience or should I say qualia homogenous to chemical processes. Love - like whole existence - is a lot more than what materialism would tell. Love is also a lot more than "mere" feeling with chemical drivel propelling it (how deep one dwells on that qualia is another thing entirely. It shouldn't come as surprise how good we humans are at repressing our natural responses and thus changing nature of whole phenomenon) higher. I recommend Sartre's writing on love and it's "doing" or "deed" nature contrasted with sheer infatuation or other such emotional response. Who or what exactly is a Sartre?

The entire human race is just a bunch of chemicals. That doesn't invalidate our experiences. Never said it did. I'm just pointing out that its just chemicals, same as all emotions. See above.

Don't you people know that this love crap is all just a bunch of chemicals?

But no easy way to add in Carth hate .

The greatest musician ever.

The greatest musician ever. Edit: Hmm... don't know why it posted twice...

It wasn't that bad.

Definitely K1. K2 probably would have been better if it had been finished, but it wasn't, so there you go.

Most of the EU stuff is absolute ****, except for, of course, the Bane books, which I definitely want more of , so no, I don't really, unless it gets better. That having been said, yes, I do want to like this stuff, but nothing will ever recapture the pure win-ness of the original trilogy, but if something does, count me in. Oh, and, like the above, this partially applies to LotR, but anything Tolkien wrote is automatically among the greatest books ever written.

I have really, really hard time believeing Herman Hesse's book can be worst ever Ever heard of articles? That book is quite possible the most boring book ever. Well, considering my sudden loss of belief in literature as artfrom (in comparison to music and movies) nearly all I nowadays read ARE articles. Heck, currently I'm reading exhanges between physicist Henry Stapp (known for solving Bell's Theorem and his work on S-Matrix Theory [who I've quoted in my profile btw]) and philosopher John Searle (your average modern-day compatibilist). And some stuff that clearly shows why Daniel Dennet blows (sorry Dawkins!) As well as rather interesting paper taking very critical, philosophical stance against "Scientiphicalism". I meant these articles, not the scientific ones.

I have really, really hard time believeing Herman Hesse's book can be worst ever Ever heard of articles? That book is quite possible the most boring book ever.