I did and it was made to make the obvious flaws seem trivial or overblown, which they aren't.
No you made it to jackoff to this game and took offense when others don't.
EX: 1 Fanboy.
The level design is generally poor, it is quite often a corridor shooter. Very few multiple pathways, normally just one short path, the stealth in those parts is basically shadow operative(I win ability), boring and lacking in difficulty.
EX: 2 Fanboy.
(I'm assuming you mean AI)No the AI is horrible. Plain and simple, wish it wasn't but it is. Half the time they don't take cover and quite often when they do, they leave it to charge into you line of fire. No flanking the player etc. However the fact that some AI is smarter then others( CIA>Terrorist) was good.
EX:3 Fanboy.
This is just laughable. Pistols are overpowered(CS) shotguns and smgs are useless, however AR only becomes unbalanced when you use subsonic rounds. Then we have Brilliance, you know the ability the instantly restores all other abilities and don't even start me on stealth, the other skills were fine. So no it is not better balanced then most shooters and it's worse the most rpgs, say NWN2. This game IS unbalanced.
Those that try to downplay the obvious flaws are fanboys, those that believe AP was judged to harshly by all reviewers are fanboys. Those that say the game is flawed but still good are not. As to wanting skills removed, I only want Shadow operative removed(due to it being ridiculously overpowered).