Tale

I can't remember Monday and that was only 2 days ago.

I thought that was the very reason it was popular.

I do have to disagree with your statements that it would be scratching everything we've worked on and comparing it to half a book, but I agree that I'd like it to continue with the story we were told about in Kotor 2. I think KOTOR 1 and 2 serve very well as standalone stories. Especially KOTOR 1. KOTOR 2's hints about Revan don't alter any of it, nor does the idea of the Exile going to join Revan at the end of 2. Now, if the true Sith were behind the events of KOTOR 1 and 2 and we were to at least be aware of that as we went through 1 and 2, my opinion would be different. It felt more like a distinct lead-in to 3 than a genuine continuating of what was going on. However, like I said, I am very curious to see what could be done with that story.

Am I the only one that does this? It's not my fault I'm ADHD. I was halfway into three books recently. Children of Dune, The Wastelands, and one of the Wheel of Time novels, forget which.

I still think this poll needs to be redone to include Shadows of the Empire!

Are we there yet?

Would one of the reasons be that since you're not a person and are instead a sentient program, you don't natively have fingers or a sense of touch?

I'm not sure. On one hand, an Xbox is cooler than a mount. On the other hand, the mount is apparently worth more if you buy the gold for it.

I'm going to say that Revan was the most mediocre. After he has his memory erased, the potential he displays shows just how much of a failure he was before he had his memory erased. All that power and intelligence, still was nearly killed by Malak and the Jedi. What a waste of potential he was. And then after all is said and done, he runs off to the end of the galaxy? Pansy.

I'm surprised to know that Chuck Norris supposedly writes for WND.

whats wrong with darth maul ?? He's all show and no go. His own arrogance did him in. Only after he did someone else in! That's at least a little bit of "go."

Obessive/Compulsive That's what I believe it to be. Obsessive Compulsive disorder is characterized by intrusive thoughts.

It ultimately depends on whether or not you believe withdrawal symptoms are a necessary criteria for addiction. It would definitely be hard to diagnose, as most other addictions require multiple symptoms. Things like withdrawal, interference with other aspects of life, and spending way too much time in the search of a "fix." Computer games don't cause physical withdrawal and you don't need to go very much out of your way to play one. I think the sheer lack of possible symptoms for a diagnosis will prevent it from being accepted. I'll have to get out my DSM later and see what other criterias addictions typically share before I feel certain on that. But hey, if it does become classified as an addiction, I see plenty of jobs opening up for a psychologist and gamer such as myself.

I know what you mean. Try applying for a job at your school. They won't mind the low experience. You may end up dishwashing, which I did for a semester, but it'll be work and experience.

Not all of us were born lucky as sentient AI, y'know. We actually have to move around and get jobs.

Wolves of the Calla - Stephen King Not as diligent in reading as I should be. I have a hard time finding free time lately.

ya rly

I'm officially a college graduate. I have a BA in Psychology. Over the past few years I've worked temporary jobs doing data entry and accounting. I find myself considering what my next step is. The two main ideas that pop into my head are vigilante or efficiency expert. Vigilante seems really cool. I'd get to solve crimes ABOVE THE LAW and shoot people. Efficiency expert also sounds like it has its benefits, I could use my analytical mind, knowledge of people, and accounting to tell people what to do. I've considered going for the Bounty Hunter route, but I bet those jetpacks are expensive.

This work computer can barely load my avatar. 60 frames is a lot, I'll give it that.

As an off-topic side note, Wistrik's signature is awesome.

All I got from the scene was that

Not all. In fact, that would be one of the more amusing extremes. From the way she posts the follow up, you'd think that it was her first time.

Yar, ahead there be spoilers! ..... Yes, and there is more to it. Spoilers below. That's it. I just did some quick research on this and it appears that it wasn't that the scene was supposed to explain it, but that the parts of the scene that really did explain it were cut.

I don't mind not having to change your members around. In fact, I quite like it. Especially if the party is diverse. Which is the root cause of my suggestion. A diverse group of nothing but Jedi is not quite as diverse as a diverse group that's mixing Jedi with non-Jedi. Giving significant benefits to non-Jedi over Jedi is something I don't see anyone doing it with the license, though. But maybe it could happen.