alanschu

If everybody had nukes, would there be wars?

I know. It looked like he was making the claim that sexual orientation made a difference, so I was asking him in what ways. It turned out to be a miscommunication anyways.

This has always been an issue with HOMM games. I would never leave the monsters on the map if I could avoid it, since they'd just get bigger. The "Zounds....Bone Dragons" was not a pleasant site to see.

I'm not going to get into it. Let's just say I can see the points of both sides.

I'd say something witty...but my actions speak louder than words. Better call your army Chaplains.

I have mixed feelings on locking people up for extreme times. Meh.

Well, you ARE playing through it again.

If you saw the source code I am havnig to work through, you'd rephrase that :D

Sorry Hades. I'm merely the prince of anal. I'd have to say you are the king. As for "fallout" of gays adopting/raising kids....hasn't it already happened? Not fallout that is, but the raising...without fallout.

Weren't you all about "killing them all?" Preferrably with weapons that have prefixes before "-tons?"

37 year prison sentence for armed robbery? Wow.

Puny? The map isn't wide enough for all my units!

I'd watch out for the fire from the gods!

Meh. Most people aren't as anal as me and probably won't care.

Barbarossa has begun! And Tsar Llyranor is feeling the heat!

It disappears after an hour.

Turns are taking a lot longer.....now that I know where you are!

Your sensitivity to the issue has had me order my men to take it easy for the next minute of action. Consider it good karma!

I'm thinking the term "good" maybe should have been replaced with "appropriate." What do you think? :D

Jussi was left out to dry. Poor MAB got one deflected off his foot. The second one I believe was a deflection in front my Recchi. The third one was a puck flipping through the air after he went down to make the save, passing all the Oilers, right onto the stick of Stillman. The 4th one was a dynamite tap with the stick by Doug Weight. The final goal was another excellent deflection by Mark Recchi.

The way I read his words was that certain races/religions/orientations determine how good of a parent they will be. All other things being equal, a child is better off with a mother and father. All other things being equal, a child is better off with parents of the same ethnicity Well, when reading that race, religion, and orientation should be considerations because they certainly are factors that determine how good of a parent someone will be, I didn't really see the link to the next two sentences. Yeah, all other things equal, it's probably best to put a child with parents of the same ethnicity. It looked like you were claiming that "race, religion, and orientation are factors of how good a parent someone will be." In other words, it looked like you were making a claim that the quality of someone as a parent is affected, at least in some way, by that person's race, religion, and sexual orientation. In other words, when I read your post it sounded like you were claiming that, all other things being equal, you could determine the quality of someone as a parent by their race/religion/sexual orientation. I don't disagree that, if everything else is equal, matching people together homogeneously would probably be best. But that's not what I took from your post.

Come on Oilers, time to Rally! It's gutcheck time!

My team got their asses kicked tonight, so I'm misplacing my anger into the destruction of you!

What? In what ways does race determine how good of a parent someone will be? In what ways does religion determine how good of a parent someone will be? In what ways does sexual orientation determine how good of a parent someone will be? And since they apparently do, which race, religion, and orientation is best suited for parenting, and why?

I still believe. I won't stop believing unless the Oilers lose 4. It's just a more difficult hill to climb now.