Deadly_Nightshade

But there is no direct connection between those two events. A better example would be: You kick a stone into a lake, this act makes you feel good but also kills a rare fish.

MotB

I never said the warning did not make sense, it is the initial act itself that I cannot understand - why would someone willingly do such a thing? Also, aren't you in a mood today, Xard.

Just don't tell her she is being prayed for, a recent study, ironically attempting to prove that prayer helped those who were sick, found that people who know they are being prayed from often have more complications than both those who are not prayed for and those who are prayed for but do not know about it - the researchers put it down to performance anxiety.

Filipinos warned on crucifixions http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7305522.stm -My Comments- Who would have thought that driving nails through your own flesh to reenact a, most likely, fictional event might not be such a good idea.

But every act has both a positive and negative aspect, so, using your logic, there are no non-neutral acts.

I disagree. Mildly cold, medium hot, we do that already.

Well, I've only got my laptop at the moment due to an unforeseen event - but I still have access to the majority of my games. I think I'll see how Oblivion run on it (I've not tried that yet) and continue either SoaSE or my second MotB file.

It would then, probably, be a mostly bad deed in both my opinion and the opinion of others. Thus, one might be able to say that it was mostly evil.

Or the sixteen might have been horribly burned, mutated, or tortured into shells of humans with no reasonable standard of living - it might technically still be murder, but sometimes mercy-killings are warranted.

Yeah, I just hope Billary drops out and Obama moves forward.

No, it is only mostly "good" or mostly "evil."

Neither does trying to say that actions are black and white - which is what you are doing if you deny that every action has a positive and negative element.

And just because people are harmed, that does not make an act "evil." Every action is both "good" and "evil."

Let me see, I'll double check but I think this is all I am running at the moment: The Lost Spires (Free Expansion-Pack-esque mod) Mystic Elfs (Race Mode) Gothic Mystic Elfs (Re-textured Race Mod) BAB (Body Mod) BAB Armor Converters (So the default uses the new mesh) Zombies of Oblivion (Beta Mod - disabled on most of my games) Oblivion Pose Pack (New Idles) Farmers Strike Back (Great new items) The Fighters' Stronghold (I got it when it was still free) Ren's Hair Pack (New Hair) Elven Weaponry (Nice weapons) Low Low Poly Grass (better grass) No Wind (no wind) Acid's eyes (better eyes) No glow (no annoying glow) Young NPCs (younger NPCs) Chargen with numbers (gives the chargen numbers) Dark UI (Better GUI) Bag of Holding (Nice cheat-item) Whispered Warning (You can save some of the DB)

More Oblivion:

That abide by absolute rules. Then give me an example of a group that could take control and no-one would be adversely affected. Even if, say, Secular Humanists took control, the religious groups would protest.

According to the rules of the language. What sort of group would you not want to get the benefits? For example, I would not wish Fundamentalist Christians to gain any more power in the U.S., even result would benefit the majority of people - for I, myself, as an atheist, would likely see my rights severely curbed, as would other people who are not of their faith.

Are there any games other then Shadowrun where both 360 owners and PC gamers can play on the same servers?

Earthworm Jim, right?

Because the Puzzle, while it is one thing comprised of smaller parts, has been labeled as an independent object. It depends on who is getting the benefits and how much I am affected.

Ok, I misunderstood your meaning - thank you for the clarification.

For the same reason we say Eucaryotic Cell and not Eucaryotic Cells when dealing with only one of them, even though they are clearly made of several differing organelles. A Piece of a puzzle is singular, as is the greater puzzle. I would disagree, for what might be helpful for the majority might not benefit myself, and thus might not be "good" in my opinion. Morality is a personal judgement, so your judgement of morality is irrelevant to my ideas. That said, I recognize the need for social morals, but I do not not preserve them as infallible.

So I guess build your own, or buying a powerful, yet also rare-ish, PC, that would have no problems handling Vista, would not be a good idea.

Check out the new j-10. Some of the MIGs were decent fighters, but I don't know about the j-10 - if it was designed to face the F-16 and F-18, I wonder how it would do against something like the F-22.