Krookie

san jose in 7 lightning in 6

nice to see marleau get on the board tonight. really thought detroit had it in them to win it but whatever. Not really interested in the western conference final anyway. hopefully gonna see the lightning take the cup.

This is a preemptive apology to Hurlshot. I see bad things in the future of the sharks =[

pronger was definitely a loss to them but I don't think it was THE reason they lost. bruins played fantastic hockey. that said, I'm interested to see where the flyes go from here. it seems like this year or last year was "their" year to win the cup. i want the devils to sign Zherdev SO badly.

lalalalalallove it.

Yeah then I celebrated

I never had any ideas to begin with silly. If you'll notice you've been the only one dropping insults, like you said, I've only been using "no u" responses

I think Volo was just replaced

ahhhhh a gay joke on the internetz...classic

the person name calling on the internet just called someone else a kid lol

Yeah, I can understand why you don't get out much if you're home schooled.

Hmm, no. The topic at hand was the killing of BL. You know, that's what titles are for, if you lose track. Some people were commenting on other things like the hypocrisy of celebrating, etc. You posted a badly-written, generic, undirected flamebait after Hilde, GDM and me were discussing a different aspect of the topic. The problem is that you'd have had to quote Nepenthe directly to make it clear who you were talking to, and then your 4chan-quality bait would actually become a direct personal attack on him. But on top of being stupid you have yet to grow some balls. If you can't man up over the ****ing Internet, you must really be a frightened little **** IRL. Did you give your lunch money to the school bully before or after you blew him? Man the "bait" must have really worked if I've gotten you this worked up about it. :D also, I'll take your internet-name calling skills as a sign that YOU don't get out much.

Right, my bad. Because I made the -wrong- assumption that what you were saying wasn't just random inane babble that was aimed at nobody in particular and of no relevance or interest to the topic. Classic internet. I won't make the same mistake again! What the hell are you talking about? Go back and read ANY of my posts and tell me how you think any of them relate to the 5th amendment. The topic at hand was (when I made my original post) whether or not we should celebrate the death of a madman. Perhaps it is you that needs to gain some reading comprehension skills LOL. like i said, you're just too proud (like everyone else on the internet, so it's okay) to admit that your constitution reference had no relevance to my argument. but to resort to name calling just makes you look childish. "asswipe"? I haven't heard that one since like 5th grade. Or last episode of South Park, but they're in 4th grade on that show lol.

In fact, and unlike you, I read the whole thread, you stunted asswipe. See, it helps when you are trying to look cool and blend in with the crowd, to at least make clear who is the target of the random insulting remarks you are making. That may require that you first gain a modicum of reading comprehension so you get a superficial understanding of what people are actually saying, but hey, one step at a time, you oligophrenic inbred runt. Best wishes, dip****. Ah name-calling and an exit from an argument after you brought up a completely irrelevant point to an argument I didn't make. Smooth move. Classic Internet! If you read the whole thread you'd have noticed that I never made a claim that had ANYTHING to do with the 5th Amendment. Don't be mad you tried to have some sort of epic retaliation post by linking me to the Constitution when in reality it had nothing to do with what I was saying.

Are you joking or just stupid? Did you read half of this thread? Half of this conversation was about whether or not it was just to celebrate his death. That's all I've ever argued. Learn to read what you're arguing against.

I never said anything about Bin Laden getting a fair trial. Or him being armed/unarmed during the killing. You just provided a counterpoint to an argument I never made. Nice try. You've now proved that you aren't even arguing anything because you believe it, but rather just to seem intelligent. OH LOOK I CAN LOOK UP THE 5TH AMENDMENT AND POST IT! What a shame that it doesn't apply to a thing I've said.

I find it strange that the celebration of the horrific murder of thousands of civilians is being compared to the celebration of the killing of a terrorist leader responsible for thousands of deaths. I'm just not making the connection. The people who said "You can't cheer about the death of somebody!" are now cheering about the death of somebody. surely you are smart enough to see the difference between someone who was innocently killed and someone who killed the innocent. and by default, can see the difference in celebrating the two.

"Last night was a good night, for me, and not just for New York or D.C. or America, but for human people. The face of the Arab world in America's eyes for too long has been bin Laden, and now it is not. Now the face is only the young people in Egypt and Tunisia and all the Middle Eastern countries around the world where freedom rises up. Al Qaeda's opportunity is gone."

No you're just dumb! See, I can insult people on the internet too. Yeah. But you kinda suck at it. now your internet insult skills AND morality is 21337 for me, gee wiz.

No you're just dumb! See, I can insult people on the internet too.

DON'T GROUP THEM TOGETHER THEY HATE THAT.

LOL FIRST TIME I AGREE WITH VOLO (besides the part on celebration of this guys death, but I'll let it slide seeing how he is Canadian and doesn't really have best perspective) MARK THIS DAY IN HISTORY.

guess your extreme level of morality is just 21337 for me.

ITT: people try and be all saint like to seem philosophical and tolerant over the internet. Nobody gives a s**t and you just sound stupid.

He got the terrorist label the very moment when he decided to go against the interests of the US and its allies. How would you define terrorist then?