The Illuminator

Gone skiing again. I have improved my skills and passed to piste 3 today. 2 weeks ago I had fell 3 times on that pist and injured my left ribs and medial muscules of my right knee, but today I have not fell down again. I must say that my new skiing set really makes skiing easier. It is head power jacket. The former were for rent and old. I have newly bought the head set and am happy with it, but learning skiing with old skis makes it easier to use the new ones as well. The rest of my day is the same with yesterday. I have finished titus movie and done the same.

In addition to the menu of yesterday, a few banana aromad cookie style biscuits.

To quote somebody elses signature: Source that horribly biased pro-western publication known as Al Jazeera I think Killian got the first part right, Ahmedinjejad is a figurehead doing the day to day running of the country, while actual power rests with the "Supreme Leader of Iran" and his appointed "Guardian Council". I still remember the trouble he got into when he accidentally let the mask slip during the state function and gave a lady a handkiss. I.e. acted like human being. It almost cost him his head, literally (despite being the supposed "Leader"). I believe Ahmedinejad is not different than Bush, Obama, Blair or Gordon Brown not only in the aspect of being a figure, but also in the aspect of election. If you claim that Amedinejad doubtfully elected but Bush or Blair are not, then this can only be laughable. Even if Ahmedinejad is a fascist, no European even American leader is different. I have summed and reminded my old comments about the proofs of the real fascists who claim their opposes are fascists in the Muhammed Cartoon thread here. If you are a fascist, what is the aim to say that ''Ahmedinejad is a fascist''? Only logical defense could ''Ahmedinejad is fascist, that's why I'm fascist too''. Even if Ahmedinejad really killed some people, this number cannot be compared with the millions Bush, Obama, Blair or Gordon murdered. Now, if you support them with your votes, what is the point on focusing those who defended Ahmedinejad in one aspect? I must also say that I didn't give a vote to him too, but if I had a choice, I would choose him instead of his oppose as his opposer is a puppet of Anglo-American government. This is also obvious from the nasty traditional movement that woman makes. It is not originated from Muslim countries and maybe that's why it is so popular in the western media. I started to think you only look at pictures of my links, otherwise you'd not type such a thing. Your imaginations about me do not reflect reality, only proves and shows your prejudgements and dogmas about Muslims who oppose your political ideology. About moonlanding I can say my prover link was not so necessary especially when it was already 'proven' that it was fake. If it was not, CIA would not easily 'hide' the records in panic and hurry and then would not make a funny claim of 'they are lost or stolen'. They have hidden them because even with photomuntage, they cannot hide the tragedic funny mistakes that are 'unvanishable' in the records. I have made that link because you and your friends used to ask me proofs of my claims 4 years ago and trying to claim that there were no proofs to my claims, but in fact googling measily finds the proofs they claim not existing. Maybe in 2050 USA may land the moon with the money they take from heavy taxes which produces more Christ-American terrorists crashing to government buildings and if American economy is not destroyed at that time.

Not believing his existence cannot be an excuse in my opinion. If you don't believe Hz.Muhammed existed, then don't draw his cartoon and choose to be respectful to Islamic tradition. Drawing is nothing but a dance and cry to attract Muslim's hate especially when you already know that what they don't like. I think noone has a right to critisize a Muslim just because he does hate cartoons of his Prophet especially when freedom of speech is the subject. If you defend such a picture in the name of freedom of speech and then get angry when Muslims get rage, then this is nothing but hypocricy. Also this subject is overall full of controversies and only laughable double standards. Firstly Europe, herself is not an authority to talk about freedom of speech. To defend freedom of speech or opinions, you must ''apply'' freedom of speech or opinions first. If you don't apply those and moreover without feeling a shame, continue this hatred pump with madly organized political mitings pumping Islam hate and racism especially against Muslims, then your claim of 'those cartoons are freedom of speech and must be allowed' comment can only be a non-laughable tease with Muslim world. In my former posts I have already made links to Western madness including following subjects: -banning a child from a French tv show because of his name being Islam(pure fascism; to talk about freedom of speech you must apply 'democracy' first -forbidding to build minarehs to the mosques with some parano-schzophrenic reasoning and pumping racism in political meetings(another example of pure fascism from Switzerland) -forbidding wearing turban and taking them off by force when worn by Muslim women(another example of fascism from european countries including France) -supporting Swiss fascism with political meetings and forming racist slogans against Muslims living in Europe(fascism ruling ,n France, Holland, Germany, etc.) -imprisoning anyone who says 'armenian genocide was a badly organised lie'(Switzerland, France, etc. This is completely agaşnst freedom of speech or opinions) There are more strong proofs of European countries having 'no' apply of freedom of speech except for those cartoons and in such a case I believe Muslims are right to feel anger when such a cartoon is supported so one sidedly. My belief is that this cartoon issue was an organized campaign to produce rage in the Muslim world and is consciously produced. Because the publishers knew what would happen when they are published. Salman Rushdi example was so fresh in the memories. A focus 'not willing' to produce anger amongst Muslims could never draw such a thing. If the overall aim of such people is polarizing the earth I believe such efforts shall not go in vain, but it is a pity for humanity. Nobody is insulting to Buddha with such cartoons maybe because of lack of courage but only choose to cry via saying Myanmar and China are ruling with fascism but honestly I can say that the western countries I mentioned are at least as fascist as China, Myanmar or North Korea. Finally I just feel pityness to those who try to form chaos in the world with such primitive methods full of hypocricy.

Gone skiing again after waking up in about 1:00 PM. Then came to the resting room to eat some peeda with some chocolate and fruity natural water. Then I have finished slither movie before I have started surfing the net while listening to some music.

A few peedas, a few milka chocolates and some fruit juices natural water.

since I don't have you from guns'n roses

France seems not much different than Switzerland to me. I will not be surprised if they, too, forbid the minarehs of the mosques or completely the mosques especially after seeing such news. It is like forbidding a child named Chris or Christian on a Muslim tv channel just because of his 'name', and such a brutality has never happened on a Muslim tv channel. The French channel's name is gulli tv and is a cartton channel. Such mid-age remnant actions may cause the same behaviour on the recepients of the actions and churchs may start to be forbidden in the Muslim countries.

If she is alive, then democracy is working in Iran and Ahmedinejad is not a fascist killing all of his oppponents. However I think the rude attitude of this lady is not appropriate as her opponent is an elected president who deserves respect. I wouldn't consider such a body language as awesome. I'd say 'nasty' instead.

Yesterday I have started to watch 'slither' movie from cds, but have watched only 17 minutes. I shall continue today but I doubt I will finish it today as it is late now.

I have skied today on the piste located here for a few hours and worked on improving my slalom skiing skills. In Turkey there are various skiing centers, but I was close to Sarikamis/Turkey because of my job. After skiing, came to my restroom very hungrily as the restaurant I have used to feed myself was closed. Than ate the market bought things with some tea before I have played some flat out2. After that I have started surfing the net.

Well nowadays I've been listening yesterdays from guns'n roses too often.

Unfortunately the restaurant I was going for eating was closed for a special organization tonight and as I was not included in that I ate some milka chocolates, ruffles-doritos couple and drank some yellow lipton lable tea.

The link I have made was more than one year old, I think such a time is enough for Israeli scientists to develop more tragic weapons and I hope they stop that madness immidiately as such brutalities I think are not effective to assimilate a civilization and works only to grow hatred against themselves. If this is a greeting, then you are welcome. What about the one (s) who are not only having but also 'habitually' 'using' atomic bombs? I think ignoring the evil and unjust actions of an ally just because s/he is an 'ally' is not appropriate for humanity. Such attitudes may turn earth into a desert in a matter of seconds as such an attitude shall inevitably cause mirror psychology on the opposes of your allies and they may do the same thing. At that tragic time you may have no right to critisize them as you did the same in the past. I think in that case no Isareli Jew could find a holy 'land'. The only thing they would see could be a nuclear 'desert' at least 3 times bigger than Arizona desert. However I doubt that those fanatic Jews would still try to live in there as they may still think it is holy, and after that predictibally Jews could vanish from the earth because of radioactive mutations occuring on their offsprings because of the nuclear remnants remained in that desert as the remnants of the nuclear war. Even Hitler could not have killed them all, but in that case they could kill themselves ironically.

Could you honestly say the same sentence if the same attacker was a Muslim American citizen instead of a Christ American citizen? Meanwhile, may I remind you the definition of terrorism according to 'American' laws here? If you read the 2nd definition you may easily recognize that the action here is pure terrorist as it has a 'political motivation'(critisizing a political organization about taxes) includes violence and is against non-combatant targets(plane ''crashes'' into a building full of ''unarmed people''). After knowing all of these, I was shocked when I was to witness even some authorities avoiding to use the word ''terror'' as same authorities including some tv channels were very motivated to use that term when any Muslim attackers attack something. Such double standardness is too much and also is dramatic for Muslim people. I wish patience to the Muslims living in the USA.

I'm on holiday and have watched some movies from cds and such home stuff. Soem of them are: crazy martians decoys 1&2 starship troopers 2&3 a nightmare on elm street from 1 to 7 national treasure narnia chronicles 1&2 xena dragon's world the tempt solaris papillon end of days galaxy quest veronica guerin hellboy 1&2 conan the barbarian

As I'm on holiday from my job, I have some spare time.I've watched some movies(decoys1, spaceballs). Surfed on the news sites on the net and had a shover, ate some Turkish traditional food called ''peeda'' and finally came here while listening to some music.

I think watching a full nuclear massacre over millions of people is not a thing to have joy with, moreover, watching such a human tragedy while eating popcorn and laughing at it can only be explained with a mental illness. Also such and such claims can easily make an objective individual suspicious about the 9/11 event. Such words can only be told only by the people that are from fascist ideology, as forbidding a 'major' and 'elected' political group in a country is obviously against democracy. Also this overall argument in this thread is about a country which has 'never' used nukes over 'anyone' and a lot of people here dramatically is full of desire to attack this country with full nuclear power. What about a country which almost 'always' uses nukes over 'unarmed' people. Would the war mongerers here attack this country known as Israel such easily too? I'm sure the answer is 'nope', so I must not be critisized when I am to say that Iran haters here are one sided and double standarded as they easily act against human rights so easily even in theory.

I am not posting here to give pleasure and I cannot deny some truths to make you feel joyful. I think this statement is highly exaggerated especially if you have clicked on my former links about the European racists directin racist political parties. Can you tell me your reasoning of my twicely high bigotness. I'm certainly not bigotted as much as 1% of their bigotness. I 'know' what an atheist is. The reason for your missing of the point is that maybe you have not read my former posts carefully. I have formerly mentioned that even atheist people posting on forums suddenly has turned into religious Christs when I was to type some critics about the Crusaderish western activities on Muslims on other internet sites. The term 'atheist Christ' refers to such people and only is valid interestingly amongst the atheists who were Christs, before they have become atheists. 'No' such an atheist species exists in Turkey. In fact it is a good feature to feel insulted when having been classified as a crusader as I have met people who were proud to be.However, you again are reading my post without enough care. I have told they have potential crsader soldier inside which possesses the body it hides in when a Muslim is on the way. The first step of the possession is the paranoia of considering that Muslim as a potential terrorist and the other steps of psychological pressure, arrest and so on takes place when this Muslim starts to complain about the one sidedness, bigotenss and unfairness being applied on him. I don't take it serious when people claim that I'm bigotted just because I critisize some unfairness being applied on Muslims or the evil political tragedies being ignore willingly by the western community. If I must join those cruel sleepers not to be labeled as bigotted, I cannot do it and am happy to be seen as a bigot. Such bigotness is good. I'm also sure that the Muslims you talk about have never argued with those Christs about the political disasters having been occuring in the middle east, otherwise you probably would label them as bigotted and narrow minded too just because they are against those tragedies. They probably are hiding their thoughts because of psychological pressure being applied on them by parties with such posters like SWP of Switzerland or NDP of Germany. If you were able to take off your one sided eyeglasses, in fact you could see that I am right, however I doubt you shall be able to recognize this with such a conscious hate monger being developed in the western society. It is only possible when you decide to learn the truth and then search the net for the tortures being applied on Muslims and the diabolical reasoning of this cruelty. I will reply the other posts in the following day or days as I have finished my time for now. I have already said the cause of 3 posts in order at the end of each post. The 10 quote limit must be enlarged to allow members send everything in one post, otherwise it is inevitable. Also I am able to see my posts after a long time I post them, because of my punishment and that's why I have answer a large number at one time.

And my replies to the one who cannot digest democracy. I think you are wrong, but not courageous to confess it. You simply attacked Islam via supporting Churchill's views about Muslims, and you are trying to make a kind of demagogy, while expecting some members, who are ready to believe this, and unfortunately, there 'is' a potential for you to find blind believers and followers even with such a political view. After some demagogy, you continue with personal attacks. At least you confessed that you continuously insult me with some badly organized imaginations, maybe with some courage resourced by site authorities leaving you unpunished for your bad behaviour, but punishing me in every occasion. This is the average, and, in recent years 'widely common communication' taking place between the west and the Muslim east. In fact this is a tragedy for humanity. Well, after looking back at the following speech; ... ...is it him talking with such a hunger to attack the innocent??? It 'is' like a horror movie!

I think you must immitate a Muslim, in any of the western countries to feel the wrath of the potential Christ Crusader being hidden in every western citizen. You may practice those immitations and wrath receivement on the net first to get accustomed to the endless torture of the Crusaders before you practice it in the real life. From my observations, I can simply say that leftists of Turkey is unecessarily more leftist than the leftists of the Europe, because of the reason I have mentioned in my former post. And I still insist that Blair did not act like a leftist about Iraq war. He was an average falcon rightist during that time. The reasoning of this does not makes sense to me, as in that case he must admit that he changed his political ideology and has become a rightist falcon as war mongerer as this and this

I think Ottoman Empire was the most civil country of its age. Partly yes, as it was not limited to English Empire and USA; France, Russia, Italy and some other Europeans were also included. However, I doubt you have historical potential to recognize or to be informed of that. There were always Mustafa Kemals in Turkish history when they were needed. Bilge Khan, Alparslan Khan, Kili

Apologize admitted. However it was not a PM, I think it was a post in a thread. Firstly I can't remember that I have stated something about the physical examinations I have performed on my body for my health, on this site, especially the one about testicular health and I'm sure that I have not sent a PM to you explaining it as I keep my sent PMs in my message box on this site. I'm also sure that I have not sent PMs to you about Winston Churchill. Our argument was in a thread. I'd be glad if you could show or PM me the link on this site where I have talked about the reasoning of my 'modern!' former typing style which was being used about 3-5 years ago by me including no big capitals and some abbreviations(I still don't know why it was so annoying to some people). If I'm not wrong, I have only talked about that reasoning on a different site. Were we also communicating on other sites about 3 or 4 years ago, as I certainly don't remember walsingham nickname from any of the other sites I've been to who seems to know 'every detail' of my former bad habits. Also, if I have not talked about it on this site, would you mind telling me the reasoning of your mentioning of my former bad habits? I'm surprised about that question as you seem to remember every detail of my 3-4 years of past including even some of the physical examinations I have secretly performed at that time. After all those, you certainly are supposed to remember my comments about Usama Bin Ladin and Al Qaida as they have not changed. Do you mean that we are in WW3, USA is at war with Muslims and so, it is okay to force all American Muslims into internment camps? No, I won't feed your tear hunger. You could be more kind against a person who has the ability to speak more than one language and trying his best to type correct English which is not Britishly yet. You are declining my motivation to type more properly. Also let me remind you that, my English was considered as 'perfect' 3 years ago by a mod here. I must admit that I'm not perfect yet.

If you 'really' are a diabolical who thinks that racist parties 'must' be a part of society, than you must support the democratic representation of El Qaida if you are justful enough as I see not much difference between the actions of them. Also Nazis were worse than Al Qaida, but are being represented politically. Also in my former post the link about the member of NDP of Germany is not working maybe because of yahoo's 'old' search engine, so I am refreshing it below to state the potential that party has with members thinking Turks and other foreigners are swamping Germany as if it was Germans who worked in German factories like slaves of the mid ages for little money and as if those slaves were not the major factor making Germany developed.. Here you go ...Don't flatter yourself, chump. You aren't that relevant. What a civility. Should I insult Ottoman Empire or support the lies not to be labeled as an Ottoman Jingoist by you? What shall be my new label? A hero? No, maybe I would be rewarded with a nobel prize for that as usual. Sorry, I cannot do it, as maybe because I am extremely justful. I think you must define reality first. Reality is not defined as 'lies'. Please; you are too modest. I've never read ANYTHING as mad as your other posts. To direct members not to read them is to do your reputation a disservice. I only regret that discretion precludes my appending your personal messages to me. What about your posts labeling me as a terrorist or with bilimum bad guy labels simply because I critisize western political actions, even in the years I have not posted here? You must thank me as I have not replied all of them like this one(Post Number8 ) not to be 'off topic', and not to be taken as an immature one, and sending PMs about the posts insulting to me is so natural and civil. What is wrong with it? I have stated my opinions about Al Qaeda and Usame Bin Ladin countless of times on that site before, however, you were unable to just 'critisize' 'any' of the English-American political disasters, and more terribly was supporting Chrurchill despite his disastrous speech labeling Muslims as uncivilized animals. I think I cannot compare myself with you in means of fairness. I hope this includes sending rockets from a helicopter to unarmed Muslim protestors running around in panic. I don't agree this as I have never heard a Japan who has been treated so bad as no Japans are paranoiacly thought as potential terrorists.

If you mean Turkish democracy is 16:9, and the western democracy is 4:3, it makes sense. If you mean the opposite, I won't take it seriously. Turkey has 'never' reached the average nationaism, racism or religious hate level of 'any' of the western countries throughout the Turkish history which has more 2000 years of past. I hope your experience is not derived from a few drunk ramblings in the garden or beach of the hotel you have stayed. Your generalization about 'Turks' is only laughable. Firstly Antalian Turks, cannot be represented as the 'Turks' as 'every Turk is different'. Also Turks have the ability of not showing a 'clonic' behaviour against Christs when they meet them, but the opposite is not true as every Christ, even an atheist western citizen turns into a clonic crusader soldier, when they are to recognize that the person they meet is a 'Muslim'. That is sad for western culture. Antalian Turks are surely not nationalists like you have described, as 'no' Antalians or Alanians have fought against Italian invaders during the WW1. If they were as nationalist as you have described Italians could not easily take control of those cities at that times. I'm afraid your experiences are as I have guessed above and I'm sure you have simply 'not' talked with Antalians about the politics of Turkey, Europe or US. With a simple 'holiday journey', you surely can not discover that every city of Turkey has a differently charactered citizen profile, even thet Antalians themselves are not like clones, differently charactered people are everyone of the citizens located even in one city. Also I must remind you that travelling the Europe as a 'Christ' and as a 'Muslim' is completely different. Despite you seem unavailable of, if you were able to behave like a 'Muslim' while travelling Europe, you could easily recognize the extreme clonic fascism, racism and nationalism Europeans have against Muslims, which seems to be shown 'only' to Muslims after seeing your comments about them. You'd better widen your ramble area in your next holiday just to recognize that 'no' western country has the leftists we have. 'No' leftist in the west could waste the profits of his own country like our leftists did. No leftist in the west can despise his own cultural background and insult their ancestors, but we have such extremist leftists. Our leftists love 'left ideology' 'more than their country' and that is the major problem. In west, it is completely different as leftists are 'not' leftists, in fact are just like extremist falcon rightists as it was left winged Blair party who contributed Iraq invasion in England.