Everything posted by Walsingham
-
What you did today
I'm with LC. Some of my earliest family memories are tearing at meat, and cracking bone marrow. OK that sounded weirder than it feels in my head. However, I confess I'm intrigued by the whole soylent thing. Which I actually think is very smart. Yes, it has bad connotations, but they are obviously wrong. But people talk about it. Imagine it was called 'nutritio 500', none of you would have even reacted.
-
X-Box One
Just because it will arse the conversation sideways, but it's just occurred to me that the model for all this is just corporate normality. Corporations and governments are all moving to a full service model. Aren't they? You don't own stuff. You buy in a 'service'. From this perspective I am buying in a game 'service'. The thing is accountability. In theory buying a service with agreed levels should make your enjoyment safer. In my experience it ****s it sideways into a lion's ear.
- What you did today
- What you did today
-
Sports query: rugby
I think you're right about no lifting.
-
Sports query: rugby
Under what circumstances are you allowed to pick up an opposing player and run off with him, screaming "wub wub wub wub wub wub"? It's a tactic I only just thought of.
- What you did today
- Internet vs. debates
-
Hurlshot's Summer RV Trip 2013 Edition
If they had any humour, they should post a pic of them all lying in a big pile with Feargus sitting on top. PILES OF OBSIDIAN He'd certainly get some, sitting on that.
-
The funny things thread
I have a number of increasingly cunning and over-complicated methods for making money, and a totally inexplicable degree of feminine lunacy assaulting me. I am not aware of any gay nazis stalking me. But somehow me not being aware isn't very reassuring. I must try to sneak in some of the catchphrases from the show.
- The funny things thread
-
What's on the idiot box...
You just had to voice that idea. Now it won't leave my head, and I keep thinking about different ways to **** with time travel to benefit porn. Hate you SO much. I blame Kaine.
- What you did today
-
Prism Program ( Big Brother gone too far?)
Kaine, 1. I don't think the point my friend was making was that it was OK. The point was that a civilian is inherently less constrained against compromising fighting forces than a man who has freely volunteered, put on a uniform, and sworn brotherhood with those forces. 2. That's a very interesting point I've not heard before. I would counter that a large data dump is also unreliable. How do we know what information has been tampered with in a large release? Officials cannot usefully deny or confirm the material. 3. I don't have much faith in journalists over a properly accountable democratic institution. but I can't deny I'm happier than I would be with just running down the street flinging classified documents about. BTW, as an aside, the willingness of Russia and China to harbour this gentleman might say a little about the utility of "useful fools". After all, it's in their direct interests to give sanctuary to anyone leaking US/UK secrets.
- What you did today
- What you did today
- Internet vs. debates
-
What's on the idiot box...
It suddenly occurs to me that you could run a bloody brilliant porn series based on the premise of doctor who.
- Originality
-
Prism Program ( Big Brother gone too far?)
I was talking to a friend about this , and he made some interesting points which I can respect, if not agree with. My friend's points were: 1) Silverman wasn't in uniform, he was bound by a civilian contract. This is very different from Manning's direct betrayal. 2) Silverman appears to have been selective about what he took. Unlike Manning. 3) Silverman went to a respected set of journalists. They arguably acted as a check on the responsible nature of the release, analogous to a Parliamentary or other process. Unlike Manning. I wondered what you chaps thought.
- What you did today
- Originality
- What you did today
- The Kickstarter thread (PnP edition)
- Originality