Volourn

Hurlshot, you claimed it would be acceptable for the cops to kill the man attacking them with his fists. That's evil. Someone in a fistfight should not be killed but then aagin you ignored my example. if two punks get into a fist fight and then one pulls out a gun and shoots the other. He is charged with murder. Why do you feel it is acceptabel for cops to pull out their gun and shoot unarmed people? Whya re you stating that their standards of behaviour should be elssened than non cops just ebcause they have uniforms on? Their standard of behaviour should be higher. It is immoral, and evil to shoot someone who is unarmed when you should eb able to defend yourself without murder. Are the cops so pathetic? And, why do youd efend such misbehaviour. If you came up and punched me, and I took out a gun and shot you; I'd be in prison. No questions asked. Why should cops NOT be held to the same standard? DOES. NOT. COMPUTE.

These scumbags are peices of crap. The house owner should have shot every single last one of them has they evilly, immorally, selfishly, scumbag, and illegally intruded his home and proceed to threaten, physically assult, threatened to murder, stole, commited animal abuse, and destroyed his private property. Nothing more than gang behaviour should be punished like gangs. Pieces of crap liek this have no right to wear the unfiorm and spit on the good people who do wear the uniform honourably. A pox on them and all their evil supporters.

"So you are defending people who get into fistfights with the cops?" Depends on the situations. Cops are human. By defintion, this emans some cops are good and some cops are bad. Just ebcause you wear a badge doesn't make you immune to being a scumbag piece of ****. "There are plenty of avenues for a citizen to file complaints against the police. Going after them physically is not one of them." that's right. Complain after you've had your arm broke, been shot half a dozen (or more times), have no mroe teeth, suffering eprmenant brain dage. Yup, wait until after it's over to complain.. IF YOU LIVE. "I know it's edgy for you folks to whine about cops, but the majority of them are just normal folks trying to do a civil service job, one that becomes very difficult in more urban environments." Normal people don't have brainwashed people like you who blindly defend them when they break the law or do stupid stuff. Why do you think it's okay to beat up and coldly murder suspects or 'suspicious' people without punishment? This diea that police should be held to a lesser standard than civiliians is a joke. they should be held to a HIGHER standard. yes, their job is stressful, and theyd eal with allt ypes of scumbags but just ebcause they deal with scumbags doesn't give them the right to murder and beat up innocents. Pounding on someone's face with a nightstick because they cursed at you is not right. Its' evil. Isn't this the whole reason why their is entire training program dedicated to teach police the proper behaviour? Perhaps police should man up and act civilized and treat civilians with respect - if they did, maybe police wouldn't have a poor public reputation. Plenty of good police officers out there... why are you defending the scumbag ones? You arne't a TRUE police supporter. I am. By defending the bad cops you are spitting in the face of the good ones. The fact you think police have the right to murder unarmed people is beyond sick and twisted. It's pure evil.

"To serve and protect." It's a quote that modern NA cops seem to have forgotten. Thankfully, my brief encounters with the coppers have been civilzied on both parts... it seems I'm one of the lucky ones.

"And all three of them would deserve it! Actually they'd probably taze them nowadays. Seriously, you are a moron if you get into a physical altercation with a cop. Darwin Award material." People who blindly defend cops liek they are angels or they should be the ultimate arbitrers of who should be killed are prime darwin example. Using your logic is stupid. In a fist fight, if the one of the guys brings a guns and shoots the other they are charged with murder but you seem to feel that is acceptable decision making by cops? Someone tries to punch them and they have the right to murder them? HAHAHA! Don't you see how evil, brainwashed, retarded, and backwards that is/ Police should be enforcing laws NOT breaking them. Stop living in Jugde Dredd fantasy.

Bullock is solid, but her co star in that one is so overrated. I tried watching her sitcom and I had to quit after a few epis b/c of her.

World War Z - Terrifically acted for a blockbuster standards. Brad Pitt was fantastic. Some of the big set scenes were very good. I do wish the ending sequence was a little more epic. 8/10

Detention: Weird but entertaining. 7/10

L0L Calax L0L The Ultimate Troll. P.S. You did a great job trolling me here! I was posting on movies and you trolled me into having a silly non movie discussion with you. Well done.

Says the guy who has never read a post of mine. L0L

"I don't go read/see Superman to watch people get turned into a red mist by punches. Superman isn't "dark" and "Moody" and doesn't need to have the arch of "this is why he's a hero!" L0L Even in the Reeves movies, he got dark, moody, AND emo at times. Plus, he has killed. Anyways, enough of the 'waaa it's not 'my' superman from decades ago' bullcrap.... White House Down - This is a much better movie than I expected considering another moivi with the same plot (which i didn't see) came out not long ago. The leads did a good job; but the secondary characters were fantastic and went to places I kinda was surprised at. The final 'twist' was predictable and unneeded though. Reviews bashed it for having 'jokes that ruin the action'. No such thing happened. 8/10

This was a Superman movie. Boo hoo. It wans't a carbon copy of Christopher Reeve's Superman. Boo hoo. Remakes shouldn't be carbon copies and if they are just stick with the original (even though Reeves isn't the original either).

Jagr is one of my faves but had Bruins won they'd have done so in spite of not because of him.

"Kobe has some legacy issues as well, such as basically saying he'll only play for LA and whatnot (despite being an 18 year old at the draft). That never really sat well with me (nor does a lot of the "I want out from my team... but only to LA or NYC!" that a lot of players go through)." That doesn't hurt his legacy at all. Unless youa re a crybaby who believe players should just be highly paid servants who should have no free will. they should ahve the right to work where they want. Period.

So Undercover - Why did I watch this? i dunno. Paint by the numbers. Mostly entertaining but nothing earthshattering. It seemed to take itself a little more seriously than i thought it would. 6.5/10

"is a very smart offensive player." nah. His strategy is throw the ball at the absket and hope it falls in. That's why he'll often have games where he has over 30 shots even though he isn't shooting well. He doesn't care if it hurts the team as Kobe is all about Kobe. Always has been always will be. Of course, he's one of the best players ever so there's that. But, very smart? L0LZ

"Championships are important to LBJ's legacy because he went to the Heat. If he stayed with his home town and was surrounded by average talent, then he'd get more of a pass on those." Are you kidding me? Did you not watch the last two or three seasons in Cleveland? He was absolutely crucified for not winning a championship there. Lebron winning 10 championships won't stop the morans from bashing him. "Though if James had Kobe's determination I'd probably put him above Jordan :p" James has as much determination as either of those players. It's why he was able to imrpove his entire game.It's why he was able to beat the Spurs in game 7 with his 'weak' point of jump shooting. Most people will give up after the horrible way he's been smeared. You don't get to his (or Jordan or Kobe's) level by having a lack of dtermination. It's ridiculous to think he has none. "What is it with you hockey people and NBA bashing, I wonder. Been seeing a lot of that lately." Many hockey fans are Kanadians and most Kanadians are bigots who loathe anything that can be seen as 'non Kanadian'. Thankfully, I am enlightened enoguh to see the beauty in both hockey and basketball.

"Further, it's not stealing" Yes, it is. "Basketball players pretend they're hurt. Hockey players pretend they're not." HAHAHAHA! hahahaha! HAHAHAHA! "Only in Volo's trollo land is the team with the best record in the league, and the one with home court advantage, not be considered the favourite." "I don't even really watch the NBA anymore and I still know this stuff" It is obvious you don't watch. All that was said throughout that Indiana series was that theyw ere too big, too deep, too strong, too defensive for Miami to beat. People keep baning on the drums that 'Miamia has no heart, no drive, no will to win'. It was 10x worse versus the Spurs. At best, Miami wass the 'technical default favorite' but most of the so called experts, media, and 'know it all fans'; all believe Miami would lose. Jordan was a flopper. And, flopping was/is not new just like diving is not a new phenomenon in hockey. LONG LIVE LEBRONNNNNNNNNNNN JAMESSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!

Flopping has always been common. It has always happened. People just cry about it more now. I'll worry about flopping when the league actually comes down hard on players who are trying to hurt opponents. That's why a guy like Lebron even thinks about flopping - his opponents literlaly mug him and don't get called for fouls because he'ss trong and he can go through contact. CALL ACTUAL FOULS REF AND PLAYERS WON'T HAVE TO EXAGGERATE CONTACT SO YOU CAN NOTICE THERE BE CONTACT! It's patehtic to steal players' money for 'flopping' but the league won't enccessarily steal a players' money for injuring an opponent. LMAO Oh, and that indiana guy can cry like a little baby all he wants... HE GOT ELIMINATED TWO SEASONS IN A ROW BY THE BEST PLAYER EVER DESPITE BEING THE SO CALLED 'FAVORITES'. Long live Lebronnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Jamessssssssssssssssss !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"I also just like discussing what makes one player "greater" than another. Is it championships, is it personal awards, stats, dominating your contemporaries?" Skills. Dominance. Personal awards. Stats. Able to elevate teammates. "Same with Lebron...we saw him in Cleveland...without the team...he'd not be winning as much or as well." he dragged that team to multiple 60+ win seasons, and a Finals appearance. Jordan could never do any such thing with lesser teammates. And, when James left, the Cavs 'magically' became a joke again. "But I'd say Kevin Durant is a more dangerous offensive player. KD has more weapons in his disposal than Lebron." No, he doesn't. All Durant has is a great shot. That's it. We saw what happens when Durant is by himself... he gets his points but cannot elevate teammates, and is no longer a threat to do anything substantial. I'd argue that Durant isn't even the best player on his own team. That belongs to Westbrook. While Jordan won a DPOTY, Lebron should have at least 3 of them including on this season. Lebron should also be in the midst of 5+ MVP awards but the voters feel the need to punish him hence why he didn't win a deserved MVP his first season in MIA. Just like he likely won't win MVP next season b/c voters will be 'bored' voting for the same guy. Lebron > Jordan P.S. Glad there are NBA discussers here now.

"and Lebron won without Wade and Bosh?" Did you not read what I wrote? No one individual can win a championship solo. "I'm not sure what measure you are using to compare the two" the measure of a acomplete basketball player. MJ was a selfish one dimensional player who can shoot very well. Lebron is a complete player who does everything well and makes all players awesome. He can pass, shoot, block, rebound, and is a guy who should have won multiple defensive player awards and should have been in the middle of a 5+ MVP run. MJ was awesome. But, Lebron is awesomer. It's not even close. And, don't talk abotu how long it took Lebron to win because both he and MJ basically won their first championship at about the same age. Lebron is still just 28. He has more awesome sauce coming. Let me ask you soemthing, out of all the sweet MJ highlights that exist, how many of them are blocks like the ones Lebron did to Splitter or Duncan? or superb passes? Veyr little or not. All of MJ's highlights are him dribbling and shooting. MJ was awesome with the ball and shooting and he was an above average defender. But, he was NOt the complete player James is.

How can they be like the Yankees when they have the same salary cap as every other team so it is not like they have unfair monetary advantage. He doesn't need championships to compete with jordan. Championships are a TEAM victory. Player vs player he is superior to Jordan. Jordan couldn't win **** until Pippen came along.

"Its poor sportsmanship" No, it isn't. "Miami's big 3 is especially bad when it comes to flopping" No 'worse' than anyone else. The rules aren't there to protect players. the rules are there to make the league money. The league doesn't give a crap about players. The NBA creates a lot of stupid rules so I don't take them making whatever rules seriously. L0L It don't matter though... The Miami Heat won so the league can shut their mouths and cry elsewhere!!! P.S. the 'flopping rule' was created just so the league can steal money from the players. That's it that's all.

Every player flops, and big deal, nothing wrong with flopping. It's smart to do and only crybabies whine about flopping.

"We're not Detroit" L0L... That's mean, evil, cruel.... and, sadly, true.... Poor Cleveland crybabies. You get what you deserve. So.. how is the Cavs enjoying those champions they were gonan win before Lebron was gonna win one? L0LZ Bitter people who whine about James make me laugh.