LadyCrimson

HInterlands:Orc lord or whatever. Gamespot had the CD for $10, I wasn't going to say no to that. First thought upon reading reviews/forums: Sounds like my kind of game. 2nd thought upon first quick game map: This is weird & confusing, and where's the manual. 3rd thought upon playing a few games: I like this game. Needs some more polish, but I really like it.

Everything from Stronghold/Stronghold:Crusader.

Finished watching. Liked it more than I thought I would. The 'dweeby' guy, Eli, so far I like what he adds to the show...a sort of everyman who isn't the usual polished, Hollywood-ized sci-fi show character, if that makes sense. The human (as well as humor) foil? Definitely didn't feel like a show to attract just hip action-loving youth, and the set up makes it seem like exploration is going to be a focus. Not sure about the actor chemistry yet. The premiere makes me think of a combo of Voyager and Stargate. I'll watch for a few weeks at least, see how it goes. It'll be on hulu.com tomorrow if you missed it.

I'm not a guy, but the gal in the purple T looks kinda cute. I can't remember the Asian woman's name, but she's cute too, imo. The guys tho...not so much. The tall one on the right in the black T is ok, maybe better if not so posed. Lou was hot back in the day, but not as much now. I kind of like the fact there's more guys than gals...(in terms of eyecandy value, haha) but I'm sure it won't stay that way.

Thanks for the trailer link. Except for the dweeby curly haired guy, it doesn't look that bad. Certainly no worse than ads for BG. Robert Carlye isn't young or no-name, either. I'm hoping he'll lend the show some .. er.. class? gravity? SG1 was a lot of fun, but the early episodes were giggle-worthy at times. What I don't get is why Sci-FI likes to debut new things on Friday nights....

Going to watch it? To be honest, I hadn't even heard of it until just now. The reviewer below (who wasn't a huge fanatic of SG:1) seems impressed, as well as a few others. I guess I shall check it out. http://www.chicagonow.com/blogs/show-patro...this-world.html

Please clinch, Tigers. And then, please beat NY. Not that I seriously expect you to, but in a short series, one can always hope. I was certain no one would catch the Dodgers this season. Rockies are making a grand try for it down to the wire, tho. I'll be watching that one tonight.

:lol: 'xactly. ...I'm having one of those days where I have tons of errands/stuff to do, and I keep telling myself "all right, here I go, I'm getting up and going" and then 15 minutes later I discover my arse is still firmly planted in this chair. Over and over. On the bright side, such days teach me exactly how efficient I can be with certain tasks, when I finally do get up and do them.

I really liked the first few years of CSI:Vegas. It become sillier as time went on, but still liked it. But Grissom/Warrick leaving made it "meh." I can handle the sexpots/studs as CSI/cops, that's nothing new...it's the graphic-novel worthy-duper crime fighting lab equipment/methods they use to process their evidence. Ludicrous.

Hubby usually only has 2-4 pc's on 24/7. He said recently that he's "almost ready" to switch from his 12 old servers-he doesn't have all 12 on all the time-to maybe 3 or 4 newer ones (having just one will NOT work for him at all), but even if that were the case, those 3-4 would still be on all the time...even more so since everything from all 12 would be on them and he couldn't shut off the not-being-used servers/OS's separately anymore. And the firewall/routers/modem etc. would still be on 24/7...because if they weren't, my pc's couldn't connect to the internet at 2am. Can't have that. *ahem* So if I buy the fancy new rig I'd like, I can maybe expect to be sucking up 200-400w when I play games. Sigh. All right. We use an average of 1000kwh per month in this tiny house...and that's living literally in the dark most of the time. All curly flores. bulbs, usually not on. People in our town are complaining of errors because they're getting bills of $500-600 for what feels like bare minimum usage, but I'm guessing most don't realize how much power they're really sucking up, and the rates are really monstrous now for anything over 500kwh a month. Turning off lights and not running the AC doesn't cut it anymore...

With huge energy rate hikes here lately, I was just curious...I know PC's are rated for certain wattage use & depends on hardware etc. and they will suck up less during idle or low-use tasks...but do current high-powered pc's, video cards, and games suck up tons of kwh if you're an avid gamer? I saw one webpage saying the xbox360 is about 180 watts while playing. People talk of needing the 700W power supplies to run some newer video cards...I understand that's because of needing occasional peak power...but what might the average wattage use actually be while playing Far Cry on that souped up PC? 300? 500? Side note: Hubby, with a tester, estimates he's using 500+ watts between his always-on old PC's (no gaming), monitor, external firewall, routers, cable modem, etc etc...which equals roughly 1/3-1/2 of the kwh we use monthly.

Because nobody disagrees with the rape charge and the topic is boring when everybody agrees. I take your point, and acknowledge there's truth re:boring. Apologies if I came off as too harsh. I've had friends with+personal experience with sexual predators and I do not find the topic to be "entertaining" at all, especially if I see anything that seems to reinenforce any "it's not really rape if..." Whoopi really shot her foot in her mouth this time. *mumbles* Edit: Whoopi, not Whoppi.. >.>

For me, at least, it has nothing to do with age of consent. You're all arguing that as if that's the main topic at hand. It's not. It's the RAPE charge and the fact he fled to avoid serving time. If the girl in question had actually come out and said "I love Polanski and it was all consensual, we're eloping now" or some other such thing (and it had panned out to be true), I might personally go "ewwww" or think they both desperately need some counseling but think "whatever." I'm highly aware age of consent varies both legally and emotionally, and certainly with social history. It is not just about the girls age, in this case, for me....rape is rape. He drugged her and took advantage. She said no, she said stop. I'd feel the same about Polanski for raping someone and then trying to flee consequences if the girl had been 30.

Today I decided that the absurdity of the tech parts of crime solving in CSI:NY (and other CSI & crime shows) grows with leaps and bounds every season. It's so bad I can longer watch without viewing it as comedy. Also...what is it about aging that could turn completely straight/flat hair into semi-frizzy wavy hair, gradually, over 20+ years? My hair...it's so bizarre.

My feelings about Polanski can be summed up thus: 1-He drugged/raped/sodomized a young teen. 2-He confessed to a plea bargain to a lesser charge to get a reduced sentence, and when it looked like maybe he'd actually serve a harsher sentence 3-He fled to escape the law and a possible prison sentence because he was a cowardly douche. I don't care how many years have gone by, or how good his movies may be. He was a douche, and he still is a douche. Extradite him. Let a new judge or jury look at the case and decide if he should still serve hard time...but he needs to face the court. I can't believe how many celebrities are condoning "leaving the poor guy alone."

I know Boston clinched the wildcard, but tonight's game...about halfway through I decided if Tito didn't care about winning, then I didn't care about watching. But poor Wake. Hope that surgery works and he can play one more year to maybe achieve some milestones before retiring.

Already done.

My mother was part of the Nestle boycotts way back when, as well. I have no idea if she still is. Of course, she also hated Blockbuster and now Barnes & Nobles. Most of the Nestle products I don't want anyway...but I don't try to avoid them particularly.

That's almost exactly how I feel about those movies. I saw the 2nd first, because a friend "made" me see it. Then I rented the 1st, and it was...well...there was nothing amusing about it, a straight horror flick, and not a very good one at that. With Army of Darkness, my friend loved it, but I was mostly "meh". There were some great funny moments, but it became too slapstick, too much a parody of itself, if that's possible. However, in all three, Bruce Campbell was the bomb. ...last night, I watched Independence Day on TV. I'm the 1st to admit it was never super stellar, but it hasn't aged well. I still enjoy it tho, especially the first act...largely because of my memory of seeing it in a packed theater. ID4 was a popcorn audience-participation film...fun w/a crowd hooting, hollering, and applauding, but not so awesome when viewed in your own living room, by yourself.

Well, Lester seems to be largely ok...nothing serious. Phew. But it appears my fear of Boston being unable to beat NY at this time was proven accurate. I shall now hope that either NY manages to get eliminated in the playoffs before Boston has to face them, or that Boston will become "hot" at the right moment.

No no no...never mind the score/pennant race...Lester gets hit right in the knee by a line drive. Rolls around the mound awhile, barely limps off the field. No no no....be ok.

On pins and needles about this weekend Boston/NY series, which is about to start. Obviously I'm rooting for Boston but mostly, I'm anticipating the rivalry to produce it's usual high-octane gameplay which drives fans of both teams to a frenzy, even if there were no pennant on the line. Lester has a good shot tonight, but Dice-K and Byrd are a lot more iffy. We shall see. *dancing from foot to foot in anticipation of screaming joy or crushing pain*

Today I am pleased that 100 California state parks will not be closing. I'd rather have dirtier bathrooms and picnic areas than outright closure.

Forgot...I also bought & read Howl's Moving Castle. Very very different from the movie (such as, not nearly as romanticized) but just as entertaining, if not more so. Alas, being a "young adult" novel it wasn't nearly long enough...I finished it in under 3 hours. Also not descriptive-complex enough for me in some things. Worth the read tho.

The 1st Transporter was decent action-flick entertainment. Ridiculous of course, but entertaining. Liked the police chief guy too. The 2nd not as good...the rest I ignored. I haven't watched any movies recently. Mostly catching the season premieres of TV series I like, this week.