Lucius

Indeed brother, and the good citizens of Hans Island have felt this most gruesome imperialism, it is our most Holy duty to liberate these poor individuals before it is too late... and perhaps borrow a small amount of the natural resources... for the Greater Good of the Kingdom of course! :ph34r:

Nah, he's just making sure people don't take our ****. I'm actually surprised the first thing Harper did was something I agree with. I figured he'd crucify the gays or something. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Except for Hans, which actually isn't your ****.

Possibly, although these people have a habit of producing quite a lot of children, more than they're often able to feed no less. They trying to outbreed us? :ph34r:

And to think I actually liked this man when he stood up before the US Senate.

How? It is not like all non-French Kanadians will move out on the day of separation. Also all business and administrative issues will take years to sort out, not to mention legislation. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Of course it wouldn't be something they could see or touch the next day, but it would be comforting to know, perhaps? Hell I don't know for sure, I'm just picturing my nation being part of some other power.

It does make a difference, you know.

Isn't that how people usually form their own country? That and armed rebellions of course. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> That, or losing a major war to powerful enemies. They have a habit of drawing lines in the sand and splitting up countries into smaller, manageable chunks (see Ottoman Empire, Austro Hungarian Empire etc.) Does that mean we can take Hans Island now ? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Meh only if there's oil to extract, but both Canada and Denmark must be careful when mentioning the "O" word, Bush's Oildar might pick it up and decide to invade. :ph34r:

Isn't that how people usually form their own country? That and armed rebellions of course.

That's what I'm implying.

I don't understand what you're getting at.

That would be pretty ****ed up.

Ok, so no such claim was ever made. That doesn't improve things much, though.

More like fed up with your self-pity. You wasted your sympathy by invading Iraq, so don't start crying now. Judging by how you post, old lady, I seriously doubt it.

Once the WMD's failed to show up, didn't Bush and co. cry about Saddam supporting Al Queda and thus 9/11?

Denmark doesn't dub anything but kiddie movies, so when I was in Spain last month I might just have uttered a few curse words about Spaniards and their dubs. (here I thought it was only Germans and French who did that over here, tsk tsk) Numbers you gotta do something about that. Fast!

Oh give me a break, just because you've wasted whatever good will and sympathy there was by invading Iraq doesn't mean 'the world' (or 'Europe' as probably meant) wasn't there for you. I remember being back in high school, and we were ****ing rooting for the US and its allies to bomb the **** out of Afghanistan and every friggin' muslim fundamentalist in the world, spending as much time as we could following the events on CNN in school. No, I can't remember anyone I know saying you "asked for it" after 9/11, but since then you've pretty much hyped up the 9/11 attack to the point where Iraq suddenly was involved and 'the world' went "WTF does that have to do with anything?" So no, in my opinion you didn't "ask for it", but you most certainly have asked for a lot of the anti-American bull**** that followed. And get over Chirac for one bloody moment, of course there's some double standards at play here, it's not like France have actually invaded anything recently save perhaps for your Wine cellar. Ask yourself this, who would you be more afraid off?

I stopped playing it as I reached a point where it crashed when I tried to enter the Anarch club after having seized the sarcophagus. I tried everything, fanmade patches, browsing on the net for answers etc. This was some 6 months ago, not sure if it has been fixed now... Numbers you seem like a fanboy (and when dealing with BL, that's a compliment really) have you heard of this bug?

Mothie I think both Muslims and Christians were equally bloodthirsty and warmongering back in those days, the difference is that some Islamic nations (and fundamentalists in general?) are still stuck in the Dark Ages... Although some extreme Christian movements in the US seems to be stuck in the Dark Ages too, more or less.

Which in fact means you give more credit to Bush's words than Chirac's. It's ironic considering that France is supposed to be one of the European countries spearheading diplomatic efforts. Does that mean that in the end, everyone knows that the whole pacifism discourse is just BS? " <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I do give more credit to Bush words than Chirac's... Don't you? I mean, do you really take that pompous prick Chirac seriously? I don't. I place more faith in Germany in regards to peace, even though it might sound ironic.

Funny that one who voted for a ****kicker cowboy for President would call anyone "moron". As for the French, we don't really listen to them, what Chirac said was stupid but c'mon, he's a notoriously arrogant man and noone really believes him. If Bush had said the same thing, it would have been different simply due to the fact that the US launched at least three invasions in the middle east within 15 years.

Sausage fest hater. :angry:

Haven't heard of it.

- I think they're in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency." - Good ol' D1ck

But why purple, why not black or brown?