random evil guy

couldn't you say the same thing about all legislation...?

What the hell are you talking about? Where is the trailer...? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> you have to hit "the numbers" in order on the seating chart. what are they? I know there is "4" but I forget all the rest now..... did anyone else see the trailer? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i don't get it either? what "numbers"? all i saw was boone's ugly face... :D

So your another let him die of old age. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i'm another "it's not our problem" guy. i'm not evil just for the h*ll of it. :cool: change has to come from within. if the iraqis really want democracy, then fight for it like everyone else have.

Going to war. Usually if I protest something It's because I have an alternative. Best one I've heard is wait until he died of old age. That one actually made me laugh not only because it was funny, but also because the person who said it was serious.. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> solution to what? is it our(western world/nato/whatever) job to remove all those we don't like from power?

Sure sounded like it to me. And I think we can bring democracy to Iraq. The problem is that they are having trouble adjusting because they have been under a dictatorship for so long. They are not used to having the abilty to make their own decisions. Plus we have insurgents that are further hampering our efforts. They don't understand that if they stop, we will be out sooner. They want us out, but by causing instability in the region, they are only keeping us in there longer. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> you can't force democracy on someone. it has to be a product of their own free will. do you really think iraq will turn into some shining example of freedom and democracy? that is just naive; recent polls suggest that the majority of the people prefer an islamic state like iran...

i laugh at the word "younglings". could it be any lamer...?

i never accused the us of going in for oil. i think it was much more complicated than that. bush wanted to remove saddam, because it was an ebarrassment(after the first gulf war) to the us that he was still in charge. i actually believe bush thought he could bring peace and democracy to iraq by invading. in addition, several companies and people made a lot of money from the war. haliburton is just one of them. oil prices are high due to the rules of supply and demand. the us consumes way too much oil, ergo the expensive oil...

So if we're currently pumping oil out of Iraq, why are gas prices so high? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> because americans are in general d*cks who like to drive big ass cars and don't give a damn about the environment... "

she's a hoe!

Warren Zevon - Desperados under the eaves zevon is the man! "All the salty margaritas in Los Angeles, I'm gonna drink 'em up" :D

how miserable is the milan players feeling today? :D ah, well. i guess making a ton of money doing what you love helps...

excactly. he knew that they would chose obi; it was the obvious choice. he suggested anakin to further fuel his distrust for the council. the council never intented to send anakin...

Sadly it's not far from the truth " (Palpatine did play them for fools for years...) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> i was being ironic...

He sent general Grevios to Upatu knowing that the counci lwould send a Jedi. He even suggested Anakin so the council would say no and send Kenobi. Obviously a tactical thinker! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> yeah, the council is a bunch of immature kids. tell them one thing, you can be sure they'll do the opposite...

excactly how did palpatine "arrange" for obi not to be there...? oh, i forgot. palpatine is all powerful and all knowing. he knew the jedi council would chose obi and not anakin to go after grivious. obviously palpatine is god in the star wars movies and he controls everything...

yeah, obi is the man. kind of cool when he jumped out of the fighter when he crash landed in the hangar of grivious' ship. other then that, i think the movie was pretty good. i give it 4/5(on a scale to 6). the movie was a bit "standard" and not many surprises, but i guess that was to be expected. btw, grivious was a crap villain. a mechanized hunch back with a bad cough...?

how f*cked up is it that someone acutally think the economy is more important than the environment...? most people are morons...

Bruce springsteen liver from NY. hot diggety damn the e street band rock!

ann coulter is a joke. i don't think anyone, besides other lunatics, take her seriously...

Hmph. What option have you besides war? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> what other options do you need...?

Bah! The second one at least was way, way better than HoI or HoI2. More events, more epic, more fun. Then again, medieval history interests me far more than WWII. The Workshop system worked extremely well in SMAC. While I have no doubt that this new system won't be as good as the Workshop system (which offered basically unlimited choice), I am confident that it will at least be a good system, since it seems the system will be loosely based on the Workshop. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> hm, i've never played alpha centauri... :"> btw, HoI is way better. more units, more tactics, more options and more fun.

i don't think so. these overly ambitious things usually end up pretty useless. at least the first time around... it'll probably work per say, but i think it will be too limited to have a genuine impact on the game.

morons! this is supposed to be an epic game; not some dumbed down board game... i guess the mod community will have their hands full once again. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Having less units doesn't mean a dumbed down game. This promotion system sounds quite a bit like the workshop in SMAC, so there will be less units, but you can tailor the units in-game to make them individual. Why have Infantry and Mountain Infantry, when you can just have Infantry and give some the mountaineering ability? Less units, more choice. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> no. less units, less options, less advanced. look at a game like hearts of iron; tons of units. tons of options. like the carrier; why is there only one type? there's a big difference between modern carriers with nucluear propulsion and the old carriers from the 40s... like i said; dumbed down. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Uh huh, so you take a carrier unit, fit it with the nuclear propulsion upgrade, upgrade it with a bigger deck, add x, y, and z, and you have a modern carrier. Without the upgrades, you have a carrier from the 40s. And if you want to look at Hearts of Iron, why not look it's predecessor, Europa Universallis? That had only three units, infantry, cavalry and artillery, and that was hardly a "dumbed down board game" for it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> well, first of all eu sucked big time! second, what makes you think the upgrade system will actually work? i can see it being very limited and basically useless...

no. less units, less options, less advanced. look at a game like hearts of iron; tons of units. tons of options. like the carrier; why is there only one type? there's a big difference between modern carriers with nucluear propulsion and the old carriers from the 40s... like i said; dumbed down. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Less units, more options, more, or just as advanced. There are fewer units, but the units they do have have much more depth to them. Thats different, not less advanced. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> that is if the system actually work, which i find very unlikely... combat and units have always been the biggest weakness of civ...

morons! this is supposed to be an epic game; not some dumbed down board game... i guess the mod community will have their hands full once again. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Having less units doesn't mean a dumbed down game. This promotion system sounds quite a bit like the workshop in SMAC, so there will be less units, but you can tailor the units in-game to make them individual. Why have Infantry and Mountain Infantry, when you can just have Infantry and give some the mountaineering ability? Less units, more choice. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> no. less units, less options, less advanced. look at a game like hearts of iron; tons of units. tons of options. like the carrier; why is there only one type? there's a big difference between modern carriers with nucluear propulsion and the old carriers from the 40s... like i said; dumbed down.