Meshugger

Not only that, he took packages from some people and repackaged them to bigger (and fake ones) ones to show to others how enlarged their packages have become. Just like those emails.

In all fairness, if the people who have been serious about having a discussion regarding ethics had ditched the "gamergater" label at the point when it became irrevocably associated with harrassment, their opposition would probably have had a harder time making the "ethics is just a smokescreen" charge stick. He who lies down with pigs, etcetera etcetera. Sorry i have to butt in here, but that is simply false and have been tried times and times again, especially by those that want GG to die. Not only it's a classic divide & conquer method, it puts the acceptance of new group A in the hand of those that originally hated GG to begin with. There will be always the fallback-argument of "toxic foundations" and so on, so no. Besides it was even an experiment to do so (see http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/events/gamergate#pizzagate) which pretty much went as expected.

Okay

Men with that kind of package gets all the birds, i tell you.

Just to make sure that i am following here: It's about the image conveyed by pride that you do not like, because you (or society?) find the values abhorrent? If so, which values/image are you talking about?

Who is "we"? But aren't the laws of the land not a reflection of common morals of the people inhabiting it? Or if they aren't, should they not be? For example i think that in general GG is fighting the "good" fight.

Well, this thread certainly turned into something more interesting than before.

No problem. Just having a conversation and asking questions.

See, if the argument was "good is subjective, and there are many equally valid systems of ethics, therefore it's undesirable to enforce a singular, rigid view of 'good' as the ultimate arbiter on human behavior", that I can agree with. "Expecting people to not behave like a bag of **** to each other is fascist" is a fair bit less nuanced viewpoint than that, though. But the nuaces of what is a ****bag in relative of good is still undefined though. Where does the **** end and good begin? What doth life? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye_iob2MwGw Life just is. It's an experience to live, not a problem to solve.

What is this 'good'? What moral or rational principle does it come from?

^Where are you heading?

I think that he is a narcissist with a depression is bringing the fun to everyone.

Pfeh, the current paradigm is that white people are the reason of everything wrong. Forget about the Mongols, Huns, Moors, Persians, Ottomans, Assyrians, Babylonians, Sumerians and so on. Besides it would be racist in some way. Topical: https://twitter.com/leighalexander/status/615150172847349760 (lol)

That has to be the most disingenuous BS that i've ever heard from you. No one forced him to shut up but himself. You cannot help someone that refuses to speak.

Reviewer at Polygon. Thinks that Witcher needs more black people and very confused about Slavic folklore.

Nobody can be chased out of Twitter. He simply ragequit when people called him out.

Actually read the subtext, its obviously a conversation about P's. I think its very apropos. Fair enough, fair enough.

Pfeh, you bunch of degenerates. Here's a hot woman and you guys are talking about nazis, manlove and and boylove.

That fake japanese accent Arigato gozaimazu, Nippon-chan!

I wll let everyone know that i am now objectifying her beautiful body. I repeat, i am using my male gaze to rob her of her agency.

Right? It's Might.

It's from the movie "Network". It probably has the best script and dialogue out of any Hollywood film.

Remind me again what are the objectives of the big 5 families and who they are ?. I assume the Bush and Clintons are two?

Apparently Andrew Jackson was VERY proud being the guy that "killed the bank". So i found it more an insult of his legacy to be on a federal reserve bill than anything. Also as with every time you try highlight some historical figures you get into that little trouble of comparing them to modern day moral standards. Some people seem to have quite the difficulty accepting that these heroes had ideas and values that could be quite revolting.

So, uhm, is this the real Shatner?