Meshugger

Yeah! Facts become conspiracy theories the moment they are politically incorrect! You tell them Bruce! You go girl! Woooo!!

The last two panel discussion condensed into 17 minutes.

The Society of Professional Journalism got a panel together to discuss the failures in covering Gamergate and other leaderless movements and how they can do better going forward. Guys I can tell all of you exactly why GG failed...you don't need the SPJ I won't be condescending but its a fair amount of writing so I wont post it unless someone specifically wants to know the Society of Professional Journalists agreeing with GG. Yeah, totally not needing that. Nope, nu-uh, no way. Absolutely not.

...the ****?

It's not what I would have done but it was probably the safest option available. Seeing that they had no actual speech or course of action and have since not used this publicity to actually make their point all they've done is made massive fools of themselves. If Sanders had done anything else it would've reflected worse on him. Nah, he should've never given the mic. He should've done the following: - Pointing at himself, saying: "I'm here for ME" - Then pointing at the audience, saying: "THEY are here for ME" - Finally pointing at the ham-planets, saying: "...and no one is here for YOU. Now, get.off.my.stage."

Link to source pls The republican debate, i do not remember exactly where. Oh, Trump about Sanders: This is simply too much fun.

So meme value? Fair enough. Almost. I see nothing sincere in this race outside of Sanders (I do not agree with him 100% but he still needs to have the backbone and rectitude of Teddy Roosevelt to reach out to everyone). After the Paul fiascos in '08 and '12 i started to read some history on the election cycles, for example on what platform Reagan ran on in 1980, the McGovern-hoopla in '72 and so on, i can easily tell that the odds are quite stacked against anyone trying to fight the good fight. Some history for everyone!

He is both of course. He is the clown that makes everyone a bit uneasy.

Sanders is getting the same treatment as Ron Paul did by his respective establishment back in '08 and '12, so he is off the table. At least Trump is the biggest clown in the current circus of republicans, why can't you just sit down and enjoy the show? The guy will never be president.

Its interesting how you seem to admire someone who lacks decorum and doesn't care who he offends I want Trump to run as an independent, that's the quickest way to split the Republican support base and guarantee a Democratic, and Clinton, victory He is crashing the system with no survivors.

That guy gets it.

What Bernie needs to do is to stand firm and tell disrupters to **** off immidiately. This whole haplooa smells like a basic COINTELPRO tactic and only benefits the establishment that he is running against.

...and that's why people like Trump. He is doesn't let anyone walk over him; he is nobodys bitch, he is himself.

Suddenly i understand Stalin.

"Ex Machina" (2015) It was ok. What i do not get is how this was hyped out to be something in the vein of Blade Runner, Ghost in the Shell or 2001, when it was just another well made indie-movie.

A few veiled hints by Mr Avellone on the aforementioned RPG Codex: http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?threads/questions-for-chris-avellone-radio-interview-now-updated-with-additional-answers-from-mca.101510/page-5 Halfway down the page, using the Durance avatar. Neat, thanks for that! +1

That leaves some hope for the next generation; there is a definitive push-back now. Wonderful!

oooh here we go again: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDwymyG7AaQ

So, do I call you Caitlyn now? Too late. After winning the argument i chose to identiify as an attack-helicopter, and i do not consent to you adressing me at all. Check your privilege, you flesh-able ****lord!

Gender is social construct anyway, so either i choose to identify as a woman and therefore can critize her from within her own power structure, thus legitimizing my point of view, or i recognize the existence of gender being a construct of the mind and therefore not objectively existing, which in turn means that her gender does not exist and my argument has to be met by in itself. Either way, i win.

No, that would not be as fun.

That comes across as really desperate. Not even sure what it is trying to say. 1. McIntosh from FF has a Flickr account 2. Upon browing it, you can find pictures of Anita and him travelling to a Maroccoan wedding, which has some patriarchical bent (=problematic) 3. The album description tells of them being there with pals and sisters as they call it. One of them being Suomaya Akaaboune, who just happens to be Elliot Rogers step-mother 4. Elliot Rogers was the virgin (supreme gentleman) that killed a bunch of girls and guys, who he accused of denying him sex or stealing his "loves" from him 5. Anita's comments on Elliot being a result of the 'toxic masculinity' that presumely exists in western society 6. It's a small world sometimes

Hahaha, quality research by anon:

Of course, narcisists like me can only love ourselves and i kiss my own biceps before going to bed. You have my permission to go back reading Adorno and cry about the imperialist music of Bach. Half-joking as always.

Because of how even the right-wing loves to play oppressed? Overwhelming majority is still compartmentalized according to their blood relatives and expected to be married by 40, majority still believes in God and those who don't are so piss weak they constantly feel the need to tiptoe around or downplay their atheism for fear of "offending anyone" or looking like a neckbeard, and on both left and right people still have an irrational attachment to b.s. like "culture" and "heritage" (see the left's "cultural appropriation" and the right's standard nationalist wank). What actually makes them politically incorrect is that they're populated with dumb holocaust denialist NEETs who think everything is a vast Jewish conspiracy against the white man. That's not funny.