Meshugger

Ohio IIRC

As for the video, I don't see how you can be impressed. She's a demagogue, as we both know that what she actually means is "French women for the magical 10-15% of hot French men", right? lel, i have to give you that.

Remember that everything will work out in the end, fellas. https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=7&v=t4aKOhbbK9E

Lol your posts are starting to sound like those copy-pasted nazi quotes in youtube comments sections. "Anti-racism is code for anti-white" and so on. Edit: Lol the quote is actually in the video. That's pretty funny. Anyways what a ****ed a mural (both times). How about "French women don't belong to anybody". "French women for themselves". Some **** like that. lol

One step closer to war, the migrant quota system has been approved by a majority vote by the EU prime ministers: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34329825 This practically means that that the sovereignity of a single state depends on the permissions of others, this is big, big. Meanwhile, Le Pen is about to face trial for wrongthink: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34324335 Finally, just to show what a world we live in, the following has happened: Let this sink in fellas, the anarchists of yesterday who sprayed grafitti on public walls are now the oppressors. Counter-culture is effectively being a square patriot. Reality really mimics the greek tragedies.

IMGur DDos:ing 8chan??!!

Well, what are the odds of articles such as this emerging after the Nyberg fiasco? http://www.salon.com/2015/09/21/im_a_pedophile_but_not_a_monster/

I've been familiar with his new channel for some time. It was the content that i was hohoho-ing about.

Hohoho, you guys might recognize this voice:

Best speech by Obama so far, and quite relevant to this thread: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APbRtBU4O7U

In the north, the sun goes up at 29th of may and goes down on 20th of august. I live way further south where we have only about 21 hours of sunlight during midsummer's eve. http://news.sky.com/story/1551853/sky-finds-handbook-for-eu-bound-migrants Let me guess, it is run on millions of EU tax payers money. //edit: Rumors are flying around that one refugee has been hospitalized with Leprosy.

-30 is just a bit inconvenient when it comes to breathing. It feels like your nosehair is about to freeze, but anything else is just people being too dumb to dress properly. The biggest hurdle for refugees is that we do not like to small talk; talking about nothing is simply socially unacceptable and a lot of people will have to learn that the hard way through hearing silence and people giving you the look of "myötähäpeä" (=compassionate shaming, people are sharing the burden of you making a fool of yourself. Think of it being ashamed for your behalf). So if you hate the cold, the dark from november to march, the silence and people being ashamed on your behalf, get out. Back to topic.

Reality becomes more weird than fiction. Remember the guy that got tripped over by the Hungerian TV-woman? It turns out that the Kurdish group PYD is accusing him of being in front and fighting along Al-Nusra (Al-Queda in Syria) against the Kurds. http://rudaw.net/NewsDetails.aspx?pageid=159906 Also, Hungary has passed a law that allows them the use of military forces in this crisis. I wouldn't even be surprised if there will be a military intervention against the Magyars in the future. Alumni better emigrate while he has the chance. http://www.rt.com/news/316096-hungary-army-refugee-crisis/

Doesn't sound like them being much of refugees if an incoming cold winter and an economic downturn would make them think twice. //edit: They were Iraqis, lol

It happened for similar reasons as it has always has, because people have fears (justifiable or unjustified don't matter) and some politician have seen their opportunity to get power in exploiting those fears by promising to solve them. But as we see currently in Finland such promises are much easier to give than keep when it comes to facing realities of world. I am currently quite curios to see if True Finns are capable to keep their support in next elections (of course current crises are well timed for them as they are beginning of current parliament election cycle), but four years is short time when it comes to crises that currently face us. True Finns are just the same manifestiation of the problem as SD in Sweden, Front National in France and so on, which goes back to your original point about politicians prolificating from fears: Are they actually all cynical oppurtunists? That's quite the claim to make. With the same logic, occupy Wall Street was about exploiting the rage of indebted people. When their main agendas surround those fears and how they will prevent those fears never becoming true or at least do their best to fight against them then they are in my opinion opportunist especially when we speak about parties that weren't previously in power. Of course there are always more nuances than any simple explanation can give, but if you look commonalities in those right wing parties you, see that how they speak how immigrants take jobs from original population and how they do more crimes (these are points that play with people's fears [which of course can be justified, but anyway they are aimed towards people's fears]), also with EU they speak how EU dictates things and forces to do things that people don't want (this also plays on people's fears [and again they can be justified, but anyways they are aimed towards something that people fear]), also with Greece they points are how Greece will take all our money (again playing with people's fears [justifiable or not] ). So to me all their main agendas use people's fears to get them motivated to vote them. Opportunist part comes from my opinion that all (at least most) politicians are opportunists that just look ways to motivate people to vote them (For example for governing parties usually motivate people by appeal their habit to dislike any big changes). Occupy Wall Street used people's anger (justified or not, but anger anyways) towards things and it would not had existed without that anger. Of course there may have been some other things that drive them as I did read quite little about it (mostly only about the police brutality cases that got quite lot press time). That's my point, the old parties have completely failed to adress the problem properly, and here we are.

It happened for similar reasons as it has always has, because people have fears (justifiable or unjustified don't matter) and some politician have seen their opportunity to get power in exploiting those fears by promising to solve them. But as we see currently in Finland such promises are much easier to give than keep when it comes to facing realities of world. I am currently quite curios to see if True Finns are capable to keep their support in next elections (of course current crises are well timed for them as they are beginning of current parliament election cycle), but four years is short time when it comes to crises that currently face us. True Finns are just the same manifestiation of the problem as SD in Sweden, Front National in France and so on, which goes back to your original point about politicians prolificating from fears: Are they actually all cynical oppurtunists? That's quite the claim to make. With the same logic, occupy Wall Street was about exploiting the rage of indebted people. What this situation demands is a strong leadership that clearly states what the end goal is on how solve this crisis, which at the same time will not result in complete demographic change in Europe or the creation of even larger ghettoes or states-within-the-states. If it doesn't, well i can imagine the following: A man, a veteran of combat, returns home from his last military campaign and goes out on the street and doesn't like what he sees; he doesn't recognize the neighbourhood, the people or anything. Only misery and people who doesn't look and doesn't speak the language. He once had dreams about the arts and even wanted to paint, but they are long gone now when the reality has sunked in. Political turmoil is in the news with reported shootings and violence, which leads him fed up as it feels like nothing matters anymore. So he decides to have a long rant about it at the local pub. People start to listen.

There will be secret lists of sites that will be banned but not disclosed due to national security reasons. Anonymous posting will only exist on usenet and the chans, all of which will be raided on regular basis due to take down notices according to hate speech laws. All other sites will have profiles linked to social network ID's, which in turn have to screened for validity via requiring real ID to register by law. Law enforcement will also have superuser access with their profiles and monitor discussions both passively and actively.

Aside from flimsy border-control and mixed messages from Germany + Junker which affects all Schengen-states, I think that the politicans have utterly failed to convince their native populations in their respective countries on why they should be multi-cultural at best or why they should slowly replace the native population with future workers at worst has caused this situation. The rise of anti-immigrant and similar far-right parties did not happen without a reason.

^I wouldn't see that happening without major civil wars breaking out.

I tried to find it but failed. Just tell us. http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=cyber+violence+september+24th+2015+UN

Guess who is going to have a speech about "cyber-violence" at the U.N. on september 24th? I am going to let you google that yourself. This is the world we live in now. These are the values celebrated. These are the heroes of our time.

Clearly that's just good old propaganda, mate. Putin's trying to confuse you. Meanwhile in the land of media ethics... Of course there's propaganda involved; I just drop the info that i find interesting and I leave the thinking to yourselves. I am just manufacturing context for you guys.

Bosnian immigrant in Sweden talks about the current refugee crisis:

President Assad is interviewed by RT about the refugee crisis: http://www.rt.com/news/315482-assad-terrorism-refugees-interview/

This just in: sexually attractive males are getting more poontang than unwashed neckbeards. News at eleven. There may be such a thing as confirmation bias at work regarding your analysis. If neither you nor your friends are getting any and it's kind of a big deal for you, perhaps you should find more successful friends. Of course I'm just assuming, so I apologize in advance if I'm wrong. But I get the feeling you wouldn't even have considered this if you were part of the magical 10%. You'd be too tired after constantly porking hot women to ponder such things. That said, I'm going to agree: the sexual revolution (whatever that means) probably won't reduce demand for something that is chiefly a convenience thing, much like it hasn't reduced the demand for prostitution. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Oh, i am personally blessed with having a favourable body and looks that women appreciate. My problems with women come from that i am attracted to the artistic, dramatic red-heads out there. But i happen to be quite the serious kind of guy that wants a committed relationship with a traditional family. Soon enough in a relationship and the reality of that dawns to them, they react like Satan reading the Bible. Sadly, I can't help myself from falling for them as much as I can't help myself being heterosexual, but that's life. My observations on the matter comes from the people that i usually hang out with and from acquaintances at work (energy sector). My original response was to the notion that sexual liberation did make sequal encounters more equal. Not from what i have seen.