Meshugger

Well, ****. https://twitter.com/Totalbiscuit/status/654690304080023552

Everyone knows that working hard has zero to with it. You have to be smarter, driven, ambitious, brave and be able to rise again even when everything is against you, physically and mentally.

Nah, there is nothing weird about that. He is one of the most respected Political commentators in mainstream US media What's even more funny is that i never said that it was weird, rather that it was funny. Kinda weird that you read my post wrongly.

I find it quite funny how a guy like Anderson Cooper, who comes from one the "big" aristocrat families in the US (Vanderbilt), who has worked and has connections to the CIA, who is also known as a Clinton-supporter, just so happens to be a moderator for the democratic debate, where the Clintons are so strangely attending. In all this world of objectivity, isn't it funny how these coincidences just seem to pop out? Hey, i am not saying that it clouds is judgement for investigating or asking the right questions, i just find it funny....and objective.

^Nothing to see here, folks! Just pure coincidence! No agenda pushed! There's no narrative to be had!

Guys, guys, GUYS! THERE'S LITERALLY AND ACTUALLY A HITLER TREE IN NORFOLK!!!!!oneoneone http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-norfolk-25364423 I just wanted you guys to know that Norfolk sanctions trees like this, how can we as a society cope with possible tiny HITLERS cones everywhere, spreading HITLER seeds across East Anglia. I just wanted you guys to know what kind of people living there, i think they like Colombus as well.

Oh, lets talk about her likeability or her being a women then. You know, the stuff that really matters?

I read that Sanders said that no one cares about Hillary's emails. Welp, that's the end of that cuck. Nothing much to do unless this Webb guy starts attacking.

Completely ignoring my point. You're a good soldier. Yup, don't even respond to me. Just give the good old "you're just a SJW/whatever buzzword it is today". Me: "History is filled with blood and iron, of which our modern society is built upon. Those acts have created myths with sometimes rosetinted glasses, but they are our foundations, no matter what you think they should be. Trying to change the past is a tool of the useful idiot for its unknown master" You: "Are you saying that genocide is a-ok?!" 'k Nobody is trying to change the past. Like, what did you honestly think is going on here? He did all those things. It's documented. It's proven. Are you saying that simply acknowledging that things went differently than what is popular opinion.... is literally changing the past? Are you honestly saying that we should ignore the full (and actual) story just because a better story was told? That the myth is more important than actual history? You're saying that I'M a tool? By the way, I absolutely love how you're talking about an "unknown master" like you're Fox Mulder. Hahahaha, like clockwork. Well done, good sir. Please do continue, i find it absolutely fascinating that you deliberately either spin my point or change it entirely every single time. One more time: Everyone knows that Colombus, and pretty much every historical figure has some skeletons in the closet and did some really nasty things (from our or by then standards) from time to time, and that information is available for anyone bothering to open a book. But it so happens that these figures become myth when whole societies and civilizations are founded on the ideals that they conveyed and people tend to overemphasize the good parts. Like Thomas Jefferson was one hell of a thinker and one of the founding fathers, but he also happened to own slaves. So when you have useful idiots who, in a juvenile spell of hatred against themselves and the society they inhabit, share videos and information that overemphasizes on the negatives of the said person(s), thus actively participating in undermining the very foundations of that historical figure has grown to represent and symbolize, you can pretty much bet on that they are played into the hands of those that seek to destroy it. It happens all the times in all places of power. Business? you betcha, just read about the robber barons during the 19th century. War? it's intrinsic in war since Sun Tzu. Espionage? Well duh, just read any interview from defectors from the KGB or the Stasi papers. Realpolitik? Of course, just look at Syria for the most recent example. Now at ease, private.

Well, it's a dream after all.

Yeah... I get the feeling Gfted1 was being a wee bit facetious here... Poe's law at work. Goddammit, you're probably right.

No great civilization has been founded without a religion. Best of luck though!

I am have a dream of Sanders utterly destroying Hillary's talking points, her arguments and her narrative; leaving her only with her failings and harpy character, just screeching "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE" back at him. Then Bill comes on stage and play them all off with his sweet sax solo of his for an hour non-stop:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201509/declining-student-resilience-serious-problem-colleges No wonder GG was called a terrorist group worse than ISIS. We have whole generation of vermin and maggots among our midst disguised as normal human beings.

Completely ignoring my point. You're a good soldier. Yup, don't even respond to me. Just give the good old "you're just a SJW/whatever buzzword it is today". Me: "History is filled with blood and iron, of which our modern society is built upon. Those acts have created myths with sometimes rosetinted glasses, but they are our foundations, no matter what you think they should be. Trying to change the past is a tool of the useful idiot for its unknown master" You: "Are you saying that genocide is a-ok?!" 'k

Keep 'em coming. I like to see the developments in themselves.

Completely ignoring my point. You're a good soldier.

If you consider actual history full of SJWs, then sure. Contrary to SJWs, i know quite a lot of history and history and study it in my spare time. I know that no historical figure or happening can be divided into any simple black/white moral dichotomy, and especially when trying to apply moral standards of today to yesterdays figures. I also know the importance of the creation of myth becoming larger than the actual man; whole societies are build upon that foundation. I know of the dangers of tyranny and how a cynic, apathetic population can be easily controlled. I know of how those that wish enlighten people about new discoveries abuot the past really seeks to control it and abolish the established foundations. When those myths are gone and the foundations crippled, they are in more control of the future. SJWs are just the useful idiots that help to spread these ideas, like sharing this video because their moral conscience tells them to. They will not understand until they are executed by their peers.

But you can understand how being penalized for having more than one child would make people more likely to do what the Chinese are doing.,.....this is very expensive so it would be rare so its not like there would be millions doing this Take your money and modernistic broohaa and stuff it. Using children as a ticket for materialist oppurtunity is objectively abhorrent and warrants the wrath of gods. I haven't had coffee yet this morning, so excuse the language.

Forced abortions and the chinese parents have to witness it. No excuses for knieving leeches and maggots in any society.

*sigh* http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/10/07/honor-killing-syrian-gang-rape-survivor-murdered-germany/

I haven't, and will not be bothered to watch the videos. Sounds like a whole lot of SJW butthurt. Should we listen to butthurt SJWs? Of course not

1. But the first link is what your link is based on. It's literally the latest official available data. The quarterly report doesn't have sex distribution. Merkel's statement was on the first week of september, so no data available yet. Also, she was specifically referring to Syrians, not "mostly everyone". Syrians, as has been established, do not make up a majority of the asylum seekers. So what is your point, again? 2. Erm, yeah. That's kind of the point. Not every immigrant is entitled to political asylum, and nobody has argued that they be granted it no questions asked. They must properly demonstrate that they are facing persecution in their country. 3. Do you have a source for this? 4. Ugh. Fine, let's check for Afghanistan and Iraq. Somalia doesn't have data. A little over 34% of Iraqis consider that non-Muslims should have to abide by sharia law. It increases to a bit over 60% for Afghanistan. The fraction that would favor the harsher stuff is necessarily lower as you'd be multiplying by a factor smaller than 1. Again, nowhere near "morally paramount" for muslims, even from the most reactionary of countries. The video showed a politician making an offhand reference to "research" which she didn't produce and nobody called her on it. Do you have this research? 5. Nope, fortunately I already provided a non-wartime example, which shows a disproportionate rape rate in a developed country during peacetime. Which you conspicuously ignored. 6. Nope, sorry. It actually isn't, and let's see why: population in France as a whole is increasing. Childbirth resulting from mixed (one French and one non-EU parent) couples is about 80% larger than the number of children being born from non-EU couples. There are more than ten times more children being born from one or both French parents than there are children born from foreigners (EU or not). Sure, the trend seems to be a decrease in full-on French births, but it will take *decades* for that trend to "radically change the demographics". Provided the trend holds. Please be so kind to reference your claims in the future. 9. Taking refugees in isn't about what you or me happen to be "interested" in. It's about human rights, themselves based on moral minimums. Wanting to avoid being forcefully conscripted to fight a war has little to do with cowardice. Nobody has a duty to take up arms. Non-violence is a perfectly valid personal choice, look it up. Again, the effects that conscription have on the population abound in history (cf. post-WWII Germany), and that's even without getting into the more muddy questions of whether taking up arms is the same as "fighting for freedom", especially in this context, where different factions are struggling to impose their own blend of tyranny. But whatever, it took being discharged from the military (I wasn't a pencil pusher) and a deep personal crisis for me to realize a lot of this stuff. I don't really expect you to agree just because I say so. Good luck with your heartbreak, btw. Depending on tonight's adventure, i will answer shortly.

/b/ will have endless of fun with Peeple if it is ever released. That's for sure.

GamerGate will not happen again, thanks to the Internet becoming BruceVC's wet dream: That ending, what the ****.