Meshugger

criiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiinge

Well, at least there seems to be an actual opposition in this election. Take it as you will.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8k8ET53ab7E - My wife's son - Alt-right - Sexist, racist, white nationalist - Bane - Sam Hyde - Pepe - Ben "Zyklon Ben" Garrison The guy's face is priceless.

We live in an age where a syndicated comic author makes better predictions than all the major media. Fun times.

Sorry bro, no-way I am going to get Dacia xD. New Volvo is kinda CEO, but 5 years old have decent price tag around 13K-15K EUR. Thats my 10K-14K EUR is my target I forgot i live in a country with the highest car prices in the world. That's actually affordable, disregard my opinion.

Volvo XC90 is for the CEOs where i am from, even if you get them second hand. Buy a Dacia.

But, but it's so fun! In other news, Mr. Guccifer has some info on the Clinton Foundation: https://twitter.com/GUCCIFER_2/status/783383503723429888/photo/1 https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/10/04/clinton-foundation/ There's a folder called "Pay to Play"

Just to make the point clear, when i refer to "Stalinism", i refer to the intelligentia in the 60's and 70's, mockingly called "Taistoists" in Finland. They were apologists for everything Stalin did, were pro-soviet and fought for the very same issues as the SJWs do today and finally went so far as to declaring fairy tales&comics for children being capitalistic subversion. They held quite the political and cultural power. I am quite sure it was the same in all of the western world during the same time period. Of course Stalin would've have them first in line against the wall. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taistoism Scroll down to find Linus Torvalds father.

The enlightment was a mistake. Poe's Law in action. I wouldn't want in any other way. clear and effective communication is for cucks Instead of highlighting the false equivalence between leftwing authoritarian revolutionaries of the latest generations and the founders of the USA, it is more fun dwelving in insightful commentary on the consequences of doing such. "Exactly as much as they do with the Founding Fathers" is a completely factual answer to the question "how much do 'SJWs' have in common with stalinists?", ie. the only sane response to both is "not very much at all". I disagree. They share the same marxistic foundation of class distinctions and the distributions of such of which can be decided by a new aristocracy compiled themselves or by a strong leader. The founders of the USA are based on the ideals freedom of Loche, meaning from such ruling powers. The only thing in common the stalinists have with the founding fathers is that they are modernistic ideals, as man itself is of the highest principle. //edit: Now look how boring it became when we try to be serious, pfeh.

The enlightment was a mistake. Poe's Law in action. I wouldn't want in any other way. clear and effective communication is for cucks Instead of highlighting the false equivalence between leftwing authoritarian revolutionaries of the latest generations and the founders of the USA, it is more fun dwelving in insightful commentary on the consequences of doing such. It's super fun! Yeah, SJW's were called "Stalinists" when she was born. am sensing that you ain't joking, but is difficult to believe. HA! Good Fun! Most "revolutionaries" active in the 60's and 70's in the western democracies, were self-professed stalinists, trotskyists or maoists. Nothing strange about that really. fixed although lumping all three together is a bit misguided. regardless, analogizing post war revolutionaries and and the current sjw movement is "strange." is "strange" at best. HA! Good Fun! They share the same thinking as they wish to be the new aristocracy of the societies that they wish to build, which for some reason always fails because they seem to forget how reality works.

The enlightment was a mistake. Poe's Law in action. I wouldn't want in any other way.

The enlightment was a mistake.

Yeah, SJW's were called "Stalinists" when she was born. am sensing that you ain't joking, but is difficult to believe. HA! Good Fun! Most "revolutionaries" and intelligentia, active in the 60's and 70's in the western democracies, were self-professed stalinists, trotskyists or maoists. Nothing strange about that really. Most of the trotskyists moved on to be neo-conservatives btw.

Overhype is overhype. Unless there's actual evidence of her having involvement in the murder of Seth Rich, then it's just another ploy in this theatre. Either way, just sit back and enjoy the popcorn.

Don't worry, the blue-shirts will counter them in the greatest battle of the ages.

^I would like to add that the reasons were mostly due to foreign/financial policy. This time it is a culture war. I think we have to go back to Reagan/Carter in order to find a proper parallel.

^Everything ok? Need a hug? But anyway, friendship depends on political alliance and all that:

Hahahaha http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3816822/Send-Nigel-Trump-flies-Farage-help-sharpen-debating-skills-clash-Hillary-Clinton.html

Everything is fine, perfectly fine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtU2Efaj0xs This election, man.

Well that was bore, sounds like a bad attempt in tax planning instead of selling policy to international bankers larping as Bond villains or for Saudi princes to get more influence in Washington. But hey, anything to direct attention away from the Clinton Foundation is a good thing :^)

Everyone SHUT UP! We must listen to the news, Trump called someone fat in 1996 and now all our attention should be focused on that, because such things matters.

Russians are slavs.

No polls worthy of the name have been conducted since the debate. And the various swing-voter focus groups are all lining up for Hills on this one. Nobody who is already in the tank for one of the two candidates is going to change their minds based on this, sure. But Trump's efforts here probably did more to alienate than appeal to the undecideds whose votes he's going to need. (Anyhow, what kind of idiot wants a President who talks like everyday peopletheir drunk uncle at Thanksgiving?) Polls are **** for most of the time yes, but the there was simply too many of them for not to spot a trend of discrepancy between polling and expert judgement. Focus groups i will not even comment on as they are the cancer of Hollywood and Video Game industry to begin with. Btw, do you live in a gated community? Do you find yourself mostly agreeing with your circle of acquaintenancies?

Finally watched the debate. The moderator was a combination between a schmuck and incompetent as in not making them both shut up about trivialities and not pressing Hillary on anything as far as i can remember. Hillary sounded like the media experts and the journalists while Trump talked like everyday people, so no wonder the media and the polls were so at large with each other. Trump was really nice compared to what he can be, so it left me wondering if he actually just spend the whole debate observing and testing the waters for later debates. If so, then he really is the nimble navigator that the memes pushes him to be. Hillary's smug smile didn't come off as "You mad bro?" or "There's no need to be upset", but rather in a "Haw-haw, i am so smart"-way. It will be detriment for her in the future.