Meshugger

You champion of art and freedom, you. lulwut lulwut would be the proper response to what you wrote. I mean, it started off with the typical 'censor everything that is weird' argument, and then you connected it to kidnapping and satanism. Censor what? Putting accusations of censorship aside for a moment, I do find it kind of ironic that somebody who, in the yonder days of Gamergate, was among those screaming loudest about oppression when someone faced consequences for his choice of attire in a professional environment, is now baying for blood based on a private conversation about the kind of art somebody decides to consume. So it wasn't censorship? Just to be clear, I thought i made my point obvious about pushing, as pushing it to the open to show what kind of two-faced people we are dealing with in the political elite. Equality and feelgoods in the open, spirit cooking and admiring pedo-paintings in private. But haha, oh man, you bear grudges like a woman if you're going to invoke something from two years ago (who wore what for when?) Stay salty, my friend.

You champion of art and freedom, you. lulwut lulwut would be the proper response to what you wrote. I mean, it started off with the typical 'censor everything that is weird' argument, and then you connected it to kidnapping and satanism. Censor what?

You champion of art and freedom, you. lulwut

Now we're back fun-time pondering! What's in for Trump to run and deliberately lose? What will he gain? So we're to believe that Clinton is capable of colluding with the majority of media, rigging the DNC, and using Soros to rig the voting machines but unable to convince a friend of hers to play her opposition in a way that would drive waves of people who should hate her to vote for her? But this friend decided to exactly that on his own? Anyways Trump is 70, his daughter is a close friend of Chelsea, and he's built up a devoted fanbase that would buy gold painted **** from the man. Ivanka and Jared will get some nice contracts(probably after "seeing the error of their ways"), Trump can do his Trump TV and Make TV Great Again for the low price of $9.99 a month, and his other kids will take over his empire while he retires to do whatever he wants. Clinton personally doesn't collude much, electionwise, from having fundraising with and hanging around people from the big club, Soros included. Judging from the emails, it's DNC and the media who are doing the colluding with each other, Podesta and DWS being frustrated that Bernie isn't following protocol and attacking Hillary on matters that he shouldn't, and being bitter on how he can't make her more relatable to the potential voters. Since Trump seems to be running quite a tight ship on leaks, except for Mannafort, i cannot find any strange coincidences except for the DNC betting on him, Cruz and Carlsson being initially planned to be pushed to an extreme wing of the republican party which would split the it with the "real" candidates like Jeb! and Rubio having to distance themselves from in order to be seem as electible. It looks more like he is the dark horse that they thought that they could control, as seen on the picture you provided from his wedding. //Edit: I do believe that the "spiritual cooking" and the other degenerate stuff is real, embaressing and should be pushed as much as possible. These people are so bored at being at power that they engage in debauchery, breaking taboos so that i wouldn't be surprised that they are connected in child traficking and satanic larping.

Now this is conspiracy theory-levels of fun!

I love these kinds of alternative theories. Please elaborate: How could his family support support him for fooling all of the american people, are they also in on it? Or is he such a tyrant that they are afraid of him? What if the plan fails and he becomes elected? What conspiracy theory? It's been rumored for months that Trump insiders have been pitching around for sort of news network. Whether that's a new Fox News, or a new Breitbart I have no idea. I don't see what his family has to do with it, but now that you mention fear, I thought this was interesting when I saw it the other day: https://www.facebook.com/scottmelker/posts/10154800337414739 It certainly would dovetail nicely with the weird relationship appears to have had with his dad. I didn't say conspiracy theory, you did. Anyways, so you are suggesting that he is a tyrant whose family supporting him out of fear, according by a friend of one of his children. It needs more bite though to be juicy, i am thinking in the veins of the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_the_Great Now that's hardcore made out of legends.

The guys at Stratfor seems to be joke about assassinations: The answer: https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/16/1643150_re-analytical-and-intelligence-comments-polish-plane-crash-.html Ron Brown was found dead in a plane crash with a hole in his head, giving fuel to the idea that was shot(?!) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Brown_(U.S._politician)

Now we're back fun-time pondering! What's in for Trump to run and deliberately lose? What will he gain? Lets go in conspiracy rabbit hole and presume that conspiracy theorists are right Then there would be several things that Trump would gain by losing purposefully First he would have corrupt president that is willing to use her office to help her friend in office Clinton already has big part of governmental official in her pocket. Trump is facing criminal charges and tax fraud charges etc. and he wants them to go away Trump will get direct line to White House and influence its decision without needing to sacrifice his businesses like he would need in case that he becomes president. Presidential campaign has again made Trump relevant which is probably good for his reality tv shows. and so on. That's an interesting theory as it establishes a possible motive, but why run for president then if he can just donate more through the Clinton Foundation?

I love these kinds of alternative theories. Please elaborate: How could his family support support him for fooling all of the american people, are they also in on it? Or is he such a tyrant that they are afraid of him? What if the plan fails and he becomes elected?

Successful trolling is successful.

Now we're back fun-time pondering! What's in for Trump to run and deliberately lose? What will he gain?

Total freedom is an inheritly patrarchical system as every man will be on its own and women will be the losers of such chaos.

We cannot have absolute freedom because people would then pursue interests according to their gender roles.

Excellent, now all the emails can be released for our entertainment.

Sure, don't mention it. I think he would be more interested in the presidential election on Mars.

Sorry for using your post as an example, but see what happens when you shroud a few excerpts taken out of context in social reality? Pretty nasty, huh? Not at all. You are perfectly welcome to shield yourself and dismiss others as you wish. The truth is that the guy has suspicious contacts, mentioned by personal name in the Podesta-leaks (Austyn Crites), and it is already been established that the DNC hire professional agent provocateurs thanks to the Project Veritas investigations, where they admitted to the Chicago and Arizona riots. Meshugger please stop arguing for the sake of arguing, you know Indira is right Whoa, settle down there. You're out-nazing the Nazis with all your telling what people should say or not. Sorry for using your post as an example, but see what happens when you shroud a few excerpts taken out of context in social reality? Pretty nasty, huh? Not at all. You are perfectly welcome to shield yourself and dismiss others as you wish. The truth is that the guy has suspicious contacts, mentioned by personal name in the Podesta-leaks (Austyn Crites), and it is already been established that the DNC hire professional agent provocateurs thanks to the Project Veritas investigations, where they admitted to the Chicago and Arizona riots. No need for shielding (from what?), as I'm obviously just as subjective as you are, and I'm certainly not dismissing you, but rather what you delineate with such absolute certainty, when it's just a matter of leaning on a termite-infested pole. Transforming a textual game of Chinese whispers into "the truth", the "established", and other claims without any other scientifically stringent or reliable sources than bits of text strings garnered over the internet grapevine is quite a feat, but it has nothing to do with reality. It's just as real as those talking heads you see in documentaries, it's just blah, blah, blah. It seems barbaric in nature, the post-Nietzschean 21st century kind. Oh, by the way, did you know that the etymology of that word "barbaric" is blah, blah, or "bar bar", in ancient Greek? My point is a serious one, though. We should all be much more careful in our usage of internet sources, and that goes for all the wikis out there. And, please, keep on rallying for your sociopolitical views, but why mask them and present them as established truths, when they're just opinions and wishes? Stand up for your beliefs, no need for filters or smoke screens. Just go get 'em, champ! You're losing me because it almost reads like a stream-of-consciousness-line from Ulysses. I thank you for caring about my internet investigate rigor though. You have a link for that? Doesn't seem to be anything wrong with that if true. Certainly isn't like cops pretending to be rioters. List of mentions: https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=austyn+crites&exact_phrase=&any_of=&exclude_words=&document_date_start=&document_date_end=&released_date_start=&released_date_end=&new_search=True&order_by=most_relevant#results Click on the result called "RE: Additional Order" for the excel-file. Link to video about sabotage, bird-dogging and arranging the riots at Trump-rallies: https://search.wikileaks.org/?query=austyn+crites&exact_phrase=&any_of=&exclude_words=&document_date_start=&document_date_end=&released_date_start=&released_date_end=&new_search=True&order_by=most_relevant#results Click on the result called "RE: Additional Order" for the excel-file.

Sorry for using your post as an example, but see what happens when you shroud a few excerpts taken out of context in social reality? Pretty nasty, huh? Not at all. You are perfectly welcome to shield yourself and dismiss others as you wish. The truth is that the guy has suspicious contacts, mentioned by personal name in the Podesta-leaks (Austyn Crites), and it is already been established that the DNC hire professional agent provocateurs thanks to the Project Veritas investigations, where they admitted to the Chicago and Arizona riots.

Aaaah, the fear of the press as their deceased corrupt temple is about to fall on their heads. It's a wonder to behold.

Thanks again to Wikileaks (he was mentioned at least 7 times in the Podesta-leak as an affiliate for "Global Intelligence Files"), it is shown that the guy who was thrown out of the Trump-rally was an agent provocateur to do some birddogging.

Panic intensifies as he he realizes no control of the narrative. Or should i say, "triggered". Suffice to say that Wikileaks release what is leaked to them and they have said since the very beginning that they are against current world order of power between governments, the military-industrial complex and the media that parades it. What a bunch of meanies.

Wikileaks doesn't have agents. It just acts as a dead/ drop box for other people's info. Which may or may not have been obtained illegally. That's the problem for the US, much as they'd love to go after WL overtly they cannot since they definitely don't do any hacking or similar directly illegal stuff; they just distribute information that is leaked to them. eg Manning didn't illegally obtain the info he gave to wikileaks, he illegally distributed information he had legitimate access too- similarly Snowden (albeit not WL related) didn't hack the NSA, he had legit access to information he then distributed. If Mark Rich gave WL the DNC leaks- as Assange has repeatedly hinted at- then it wasn't hacked either, since he had legit access to it. The only election relevant stuff that was likely hacked is the Podesta emails where he fairly clearly got phished. Yep, and that's the crux of the matter. They're real documents and emails, and there's never been a serious effort to discredit WL information as being false or altered, all the effort has gone into obfuscation rather than denial. If they were false that would be the defence, and it would be a complete one that would discredit WL far more than any amount of neo Red Scare McCarthyism and claims of bias could. Gee what a surprise, Zora defending Wikileaks. As usual you present a subjective and biased view of the reality of political developments around the world. For example you say things like " It just acts as a dead/ drop box for other people's info" and " they just distribute information that is leaked to them " , someone who believed you and had no knowledge of Wikileaks would think " so its just a benevolent organisation that just seeks to share information with the global information , whats wrong with that " Nothing would be wrong with that if that is what Wikileaks does....but they absolutely dont do that. They selectively target the Democrats and have ensured they release certain emails strategically to achieve the maximum disruption to the US election..nothing negative about Trump ...nothing So please stop suggesting Wikileaks is about " distributing information that is leaked to them ". They have a political agenda and only release information that aligns to that agenda That is the crux of matter It's afraid.

Interesting video: https://twitter.com/VivaLaFreedom/status/795004230880870401 What does Hillary mean there?

Once again, reality is more fun than the internet: Ozzy should rewrite his old hit to accomodate Hillary: http://edition.cnn.com/US/9606/22/hillary.book/

Not in the western world it ain't. The planet isn't going to get less ****ed if we breed like rabbits, too. Actually the planet is quite fine. Volourn beat me to it.

Not in the western world it ain't.