Meshugger

WHAT IN THE ACTUAL ****? I am honestly surprised on how that could be legal or even socially possible. Why haven't a mob formed and burn down the place? How on earth can that be acceptable for the dutch?

Has this been posted? The Captain of the LAPD traveling to Scandinavia

I never even heard of the Cham before. Keep going, i love this!

I can bet he means: - "Socially enlighting" - "Socially concious" - "Didactic" - "Norm Critical" You know, that kind of preachy game that punishes the player directly or indirectly through shameful dialogues.

Guildmaster? Also, third FTC update. YYEEEEESSS

Longknife: He's expert at trolling people, and generally an ****. But his articles are well written. Orogun01: ??

Milo is on the warpath again: http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/11/27/An-open-letter-to-Bloomberg-s-Sheelah-Kolhatkar-on-the-delicate-matter-of-Anita-Sarkeesian I....I agree with Milo? Before i know it, maybe Glen Beck sounds a reasonable man by how this is going.

The underlying cruelty of those people amaze me at some times. I wonder of they can try to justify murder anytime soon...better not dwell in those thoughts. Chomsky on post-modernistic thoughts and methods, sound familiar?

...and already posted in the earlier thread But this Seedscape actually looks like a game (with stupidly adorable design). Quite interesting considering what the journalists on the other side of the fence have been championing and defending.

The media does little to help in these situations really. They are more likely to beat the wardrums than anything else: https://archive.today/t7JPQ

Pfeh, like the media would care.

That's just ****ing depressing. Come out of the shadows you cowards!

Anita worked for years for a PUA? hohohoho http://guardianlv.com/2014/11/anita-sarkeesian-unmasked-feminist-icon-or-con-artist/

It's ok since it is by people who consider themselves marginalized, therefore their actions are completely justified. The fault lies on society that made them feel rightous to vandalize. Repent or else someone will write a shameful blog about you.

- "Here's your report, chief. Our focus groups showed that a film called Guardians of the Galaxy is the 'in' thing among kids nowadays" - "Excellent. Contact the head of marketing and get the lead animator in as well. We need to capitalize on this 'in' thing"

The search for this causality can be misplaced at times by politicians. I have already heard that it is society's fault, that people shoule be feeling more welcomed, and that the current power-structure marginalizes minorities. Basically it is the majority's fault inheritly. While normal people can smell such accusations as BS, the politicians do not. What i haven't heard is any politician (or even people in media) raising for serious research on anti-social behaviour on minority groups and how to develop preventative and rehabilitative measures. Because it is a complex problem, since as earlier mentioned in the thread, the same problem does not seem to happen in asian or first generation immigrants from africa.

The cis label i deliberate since the it lowers its significance to be equal to all other possible gender constructs. Normal cannot be used because it implies that all other definitions are a deviation of a standard state. By removing normal and changing it to 'cis', it is just another gender construct, inheritly equal to otherkin, dragonXirkin and whatnot. That way you can imply that your self-identified gender is as reasonable as Joe Sixpack and not for investigation for your mental health.

I do not like being right about these post-modernistic SJWs When there is no truth, reason, empiricism or beauty, there is only power. It is the only thing that matters, and it is achieved through force, bullying and malice. The only way to rob them of their imaginary power is to **** them over by simple mockery. It shows that they have zero influence or power over you as an individual or as a group. Example:

But, but we were told that the industry hates us

Damn you, now i can't unsee it

Hoho, that i did. That i did. I want Jenn Frank to debate RogueStar on game design. That would be soooooo delicious.

I like it as it is a big slap in the face against modern gaming: Simple, straight-forward and too much hand-holding. You die (a lot) in this game it is because you are not good enough; simply restart, train, get better and beat it. The reward itself for figuring out a strategy of impeccable moves is incredibly gratifying and it shines in this game. //edit: I was supposed to post about Far Cry, but got lost in Dark Souls. I played the first Far Cry, which was good in its time. Didn't care for the rest until Blood Dragon, now that was awesome.

Who was it that said most game devs are against GG? What these anti-GG has accomplished has been pissing of almost everyone except themselves and general alienation. I can't wait until they manage to get into a situation in direct conflict of the 1st amendment in the US, because I really like to see them try to bully the US government. Then, perhaps, the ride will end. Brutally and swiftfully.

The difference is that Gamasutra wrote about youtube presenters (thier competition), and the complaints from GG were about it Gawker's shady marketing practices in their articles. But if the Gamasutra wants to pat themselves on the back, let them.

The comments are awesome: