You basically need 8s of lvl 1 chant to cast paralysis cone (which last... 8s + Int). So yes, I think it could matter. Against eyeless, I noticed nothing was more efficient than mental binding (paralysis vs will). If you don't have cipher, you can use a chanter.

 

If course, in this case, not using lvl 3 bread and butter fire chants is less critical as they are immuned to fire. But it is in my opinion just an example of alternate strategy.

What about Eyestrike? Does it work on... you know... Eyeless?

You basically need 8s of lvl 1 chant to cast paralysis cone (which last... 8s + Int). So yes, I think it could matter. Against eyeless, I noticed nothing was more efficient than mental binding (paralysis vs will). If you don't have cipher, you can use a chanter.

 

If course, in this case, not using lvl 3 bread and butter fire chants is less critical as they are immuned to fire. But it is in my opinion just an example of alternate strategy.

Oh I misunderstood your post then, I thought you said you wanted to base the chanter on that playstyle entirely.

Ofc situationally this is good.

What about Eyestrike? Does it work on... you know... Eyeless?

Arent they immune to blind :D cuz if they not its too funny lol 

^ Yes, they are)

They are also immune to: Poison, Disease, Sickened, Confused, Charmed, Dominated and Unconscious.

 

As for the Eyestrike... well, at least it can daze the main target   

But, yeah, ofc it's better to just paralyze them vs will.

Edited April 8, 20169 yr by MaxQuest

My rogue with Eyestrike armor and Nightshroud mace crying

 

he been crying for some time now tho anyway 

Edited April 8, 20169 yr by Blunderboss