Orogun01 Posted April 4, 2014 Posted April 4, 2014 Winged Orcs; now I've seen everything. I'd say the answer to that question is kind of like the answer to "who's the sucker in this poker game?"* *If you can't tell, it's you.
melkathi Posted April 4, 2014 Posted April 4, 2014 Pretty much. Age of Wonders 3 is a lot more like the original Age of Wonders than 2 or Shadow Magic. That way it has become also more intuitive, as you no longer have the wizard in his/her tower. Unobtrusively informing you about my new ebook (which you should feel free to read and shower with praise).
melkathi Posted April 4, 2014 Posted April 4, 2014 Winged Orcs; now I've seen everything. You haven't seen the goblin succubus or the dwarven exalted. You know nothing John Snow. 2 Unobtrusively informing you about my new ebook (which you should feel free to read and shower with praise).
HoonDing Posted April 4, 2014 Posted April 4, 2014 Are there multiple paths through the game like in the first game? I loved the Chaotic Stupid playthrough Halflings -> Lizardmen -> Undead. I never liked that the standard Keeper path Halflings -> Dwarves -> Elves was made canon at any rate, Halflings -> Lizardmen -> Highmen was so much more poignant. The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.
Serrano Posted April 4, 2014 Posted April 4, 2014 There are two campaigns, high elves and humans. No idea how much either campaigns branch though as I've not played them yet.
melkathi Posted April 4, 2014 Posted April 4, 2014 Two campaigns and apparently each branches once. So two campaigns with two endings each. You get less choices than in the first game but obviously more than in the second and third game (that had 0 choice ). I can't say how significant or not the choices are. I am only now on mission 4 of the elven campaign and apparently about to make my first choice. Unobtrusively informing you about my new ebook (which you should feel free to read and shower with praise).
Orogun01 Posted April 5, 2014 Posted April 5, 2014 You know nothing John Snow.As someone who has had that same ****ing phrase said to him in real life for a whole ****ing year wish to healthily say: **** you! 2 I'd say the answer to that question is kind of like the answer to "who's the sucker in this poker game?"* *If you can't tell, it's you.
NOK222 Posted April 9, 2014 Author Posted April 9, 2014 Two campaigns and apparently each branches once. So two campaigns with two endings each. You get less choices than in the first game but obviously more than in the second and third game (that had 0 choice ). I can't say how significant or not the choices are. I am only now on mission 4 of the elven campaign and apparently about to make my first choice. I think choosing the "good" choice for both will coincide. I haven't finished the human campaign, but it seems that way due to the ending of the elven campaign. Halflings -> Lizardmen -> Highmen was so much more poignant. This is what I did. It's weird considering the Highmen leader continued being a major character. Ka-ka-ka-ka-Cocaine!
melkathi Posted April 9, 2014 Posted April 9, 2014 I was out of town for a few days so am still wrapping up mission 4 of the elven campaign :/ Oh well, no rush Not finishing any map without having cleared every dungeon. And Elven 4 has loads of those. Also have tried a bit of random map and scenarios, just so I can create my own characters. With the original Age of Wonders, being a do-gooder, I'd feel the urge to play halfling->dwarf->elf, but all the other endings were so much more interesting. Unobtrusively informing you about my new ebook (which you should feel free to read and shower with praise).
HoonDing Posted April 11, 2014 Posted April 11, 2014 The Undead campaigns were my favourite, crushing everyone with an army of grim reapers was hilarious. The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.
Bos_hybrid Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 (edited) I've enjoyed playing AOW3, but it's lacking something(besides the obvious undead). It needs random events, just to add another factor to the game. Also better diplomacy and AI. Edited April 12, 2014 by Bos_hybrid
melkathi Posted April 13, 2014 Posted April 13, 2014 The more I play the game, the less I like it :/ The new "rangd attacks always hit" mechanic has seriously damaged balance of ranged vs infantry and made sieges ridiculous, what with archers shooting through stone walls. I used to enjoy sieges in this series. Sure sometimes you got unlucky and sometimes you got stupidly lucky (and shot down a dragon just with frostling snowscrapers). But now all you need is enough ranged units to shoot through the walls and gates (or moveandfireignorecovercompletlyandalway****-trebuchets) and you are done. Unobtrusively informing you about my new ebook (which you should feel free to read and shower with praise).
Drowsy Emperor Posted April 14, 2014 Posted April 14, 2014 (edited) I couldn't play it. Graphics are too kitschy and busy and the lore is boring. Edited April 14, 2014 by Drowsy Emperor И погибе Српски кнез Лазаре,И његова сва изгибе војска, Седамдесет и седам иљада;Све је свето и честито билоИ миломе Богу приступачно.
melkathi Posted April 14, 2014 Posted April 14, 2014 For the lore to be interesting you'd have to start with the first game. If you didn't play that back then, the story is meh. Unobtrusively informing you about my new ebook (which you should feel free to read and shower with praise).
Drowsy Emperor Posted April 14, 2014 Posted April 14, 2014 (edited) I skipped it back then. Played a bit of HOMM but it didn't hold me. Actually I never went further than Alpha Centauri in 4X games. I tried a few others out, even played them for a day or two but ultimately gave up before becoming proficient. I wanted to, but couldn't. Strategy games without a strong setting to back them up don't hold my interest for long. I'm more interested in immersing myself in the world than mastering the numbers. Which is why I suck at strategy games. Edited April 14, 2014 by Drowsy Emperor И погибе Српски кнез Лазаре,И његова сва изгибе војска, Седамдесет и седам иљада;Све је свето и честито билоИ миломе Богу приступачно.
melkathi Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Alpha Centauri was one of a kind. The original Age of Wonders had a remarkably good campaign with multiple endings. At the time it really stood out. And the writing worked enough to let fans of that game put up with the writing in the sequels The problem with the writing in Age of Wonders 3 is that it is trying to tie together 3-4 games. Something they didn't do a good job with between the orginal and Age of Wonders 2: the Wizards Throne. I sometimes play some Endless Space. But as you say, the story doesn't draw me in the same way Alpha Centauri did. And I can't really play Civ games anymore. Unobtrusively informing you about my new ebook (which you should feel free to read and shower with praise).
NOK222 Posted April 15, 2014 Author Posted April 15, 2014 Something they didn't do a good job with between the orginal and Age of Wonders 2: the Wizards Throne. To be fair, I don't think the Age of Wonders is a hallmark of writing. That being said, have you guys read some of the unit descriptions in this game? It's hilarious. Ka-ka-ka-ka-Cocaine!
melkathi Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Age of Wonders 2 was the low point of that non-hallmarknss though I enjoy the goblin descriptions quite a lot. Unobtrusively informing you about my new ebook (which you should feel free to read and shower with praise).
NOK222 Posted April 15, 2014 Author Posted April 15, 2014 The beetle one gave me a chuckle. Ka-ka-ka-ka-Cocaine!
Drowsy Emperor Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 Alpha Centauri was one of a kind. The original Age of Wonders had a remarkably good campaign with multiple endings. At the time it really stood out. And the writing worked enough to let fans of that game put up with the writing in the sequels The problem with the writing in Age of Wonders 3 is that it is trying to tie together 3-4 games. Something they didn't do a good job with between the orginal and Age of Wonders 2: the Wizards Throne. I sometimes play some Endless Space. But as you say, the story doesn't draw me in the same way Alpha Centauri did. And I can't really play Civ games anymore. I just got Endless space. I took a minute or two on the main screen looking for a campaign or story missions. Realizing there is none, I tried it out a bit. Seems polished enough, the UI isn't bad. Usually in these games its a pain in the ass to learn how to play it, but this looks quite straightforward. Alas its still lacking the draw of a game with a story. I think its good mod material, seeing as how you can make your own factions. И погибе Српски кнез Лазаре,И његова сва изгибе војска, Седамдесет и седам иљада;Све је свето и честито билоИ миломе Богу приступачно.
HoonDing Posted April 15, 2014 Posted April 15, 2014 First game had a pretty Tolkienesque story & atmosphere depending on which path you took.Sequels were just generic fantasy. The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.
NOK222 Posted April 16, 2014 Author Posted April 16, 2014 First game had a pretty Tolkienesque story & atmosphere depending on which path you took. I have fond memories of the hobbit army I built in the Shire like area of the first part of the game. Ka-ka-ka-ka-Cocaine!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now