Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

DISCLAIMER: Do not take what I write seriously unless it is clearly and in no uncertain terms, declared by me to be meant in a serious and non-humoristic manner. If there is no clear indication, asume the post is written in jest. This notification is meant very seriously and its purpouse is to avoid misunderstandings and the consequences thereof. Furthermore; I can not be held accountable for anything I write on these forums since the idea of taking serious responsability for my unserious actions, is an oxymoron in itself.

 

Important: as the following sentence contains many naughty words I warn you not to read it under any circumstances; botty, knickers, wee, erogenous zone, psychiatrist, clitoris, stockings, bosom, poetry reading, dentist, fellatio and the department of agriculture.

 

"I suppose outright stupidity and complete lack of taste could also be considered points of view. "

Posted

I just feel sorry for the poor bastard who has to chisel the name on the gravestone.

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Posted

The Habsburger family is still around? I never knew that :lol:

"Some men see things as they are and say why?"
"I dream things that never were and say why not?"
- George Bernard Shaw

"Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man."
- Friedrich Nietzsche

 

"The amount of energy necessary to refute bull**** is an order of magnitude bigger than to produce it."

- Some guy 

Posted (edited)
The Habsburger family is still around? I never knew that :lol:

The whole family is about 400 big.

 

But of course they don't rule Central Europe anymore. They still have some influence, one way or the other. As politicians, entrepreneurs, etc.

Edited by Morgoth
Posted
Hey I just read that Otto was a good friend with Roosevelt. And he prevented that Austria wasn't bombed into a ****ing desert after WW2, like Germany. Only a little bit less.

 

Well done, Otto.

 

Are you sure that wasn't more to do with the flight patterns from Britain?

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Posted

Flight patterns? Otto was a good friend of Churchill and I think if Otto didn't make it clear to the allied leaders that we were pressured and bullied into Hitlers Reich, I don't think anybody would had given a **** to bomb Austrian cities into total Oblivion.

Posted

europe-relief-map.jpg

 

You see Britain? You see Austria, you see the industrial heartland of Germany at that time, in North Western Germany?

 

Draw lines between Britain and those locations.

 

One line is short and over open water, and open flat land. This line ends in Germany.

 

The other line is much longer, and goes over either the other location or over the bloody Alps. Meaning they'd either have to be dead set on NOT bombing Germans or very very keen on mountains. And being in the air for a lot longer.

 

Occams' razor seems in order.

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Posted (edited)
Flight patterns? Otto was a good friend of Churchill and I think if Otto didn't make it clear to the allied leaders that we were pressured and bullied into Hitlers Reich, I don't think anybody would had given a **** to bomb Austrian cities into total Oblivion.

Still in denial? You're the only country that greeted the Wehrmacht with flowers and cheering, rather than bullets.

Edited by virumor

The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.

Posted (edited)
Flight patterns? Otto was a good friend of Churchill and I think if Otto didn't make it clear to the allied leaders that we were pressured and bullied into Hitlers Reich, I don't think anybody would had given a **** to bomb Austrian cities into total Oblivion.

Still in denial? You're the only country that greeted the Wehrmacht with flowers and cheering, rather than bullets.

Woah, another ignorant individual that can't make connections.

 

Educate yourself first, then come back again.

 

And let's better not talk about the Belgian Nazi collaborator...

Edited by Morgoth
Posted
@Wals

 

The Americans and Brits could have bombed Vienne, Wien-Neustadt, Graz, Salzburg etc easily. Don't tell me your planes couldn't flight over the Alps. That's nonsense.

 

I'm no plane specialist, and I'm guessing you aren't eirther. So let's be dignified and agree that at surface level, given the choice between bombing Germany and bombing Austria, Germany is a lot closer and simpler.

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Posted (edited)
@Wals

 

The Americans and Brits could have bombed Vienne, Wien-Neustadt, Graz, Salzburg etc easily. Don't tell me your planes couldn't flight over the Alps. That's nonsense.

 

I'm no plane specialist, and I'm guessing you aren't eirther. So let's be dignified and agree that at surface level, given the choice between bombing Germany and bombing Austria, Germany is a lot closer and simpler.

Logistics and distances have certainly also a lot to do with it. There were considered several reasons by Churchill and Roosevelt why some industrial areas in Austria weren't totally destroyed, but I'm posititive that Otto's intervention/plead was one of them. After all, in 2007 he gave his last interview at some Austrian newspaper, and he said so himself. Why would he lie?

 

@virumor

 

Just to be clear. I'm not blind of the atrrocities many "Austrians" have commited during WW2.

 

But let's also not forget that Austria was the first country that saw in the Nazis a danger, and the first country who officially prohibited the Nazi party and locked every party member into prison. This was commenced my the chancellor Engelbert Dollfu?. Of course he was then murdered by the Nazi party. Meanwhile, Britain and the Frenchies just sat around and did nothing.

 

Let's also not forget that the suffering back then was immense. 30% jobless rate, immensivle high interest rates to pay for bank loans, and lot's of starvation. Austria was back then ass poor. The public back then was actually naive enough to trust statesmen, so when Hitler made all his promises, the masses just believed him. Of course that he turned out to be a maniac and had plans for a war was never known - until it was too late. Now of course someone can argue that's not an excuse, and probbaly it isn't, but desperation often leads to ugly things.

Edited by Morgoth
Posted

The Habsburgs spent 600 years trying to unite Europe through lovemaking rather than war, that has to count for something :shifty:

“He who joyfully marches to music in rank and file has already earned my contempt. He has been given a large brain by mistake, since for him the spinal cord would surely suffice.” - Albert Einstein
 

Posted
The Habsburgs spent 600 years trying to unite Europe through lovemaking rather than war, that has to count for something :shifty:

The German Habsburgs were ok, but the Spanish Habsburgs' reign of terror will never be forgotten.

The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.

Posted
@Wals

 

The Americans and Brits could have bombed Vienne, Wien-Neustadt, Graz, Salzburg etc easily. Don't tell me your planes couldn't flight over the Alps. That's nonsense.

 

I'm no plane specialist, and I'm guessing you aren't eirther. So let's be dignified and agree that at surface level, given the choice between bombing Germany and bombing Austria, Germany is a lot closer and simpler.

Logistics and distances have certainly also a lot to do with it. There were considered several reasons by Churchill and Roosevelt why some industrial areas in Austria weren't totally destroyed, but I'm posititive that Otto's intervention/plead was one of them. After all, in 2007 he gave his last interview at some Austrian newspaper, and he said so himself. Why would he lie?

 

 

That's a little naive, isn't it? You're asking why a man would claim t ohave been the author of his nation not getting blown ass-backward into the stone age? Maybe because it makes him sound clever...

"It wasn't lies. It was just... bull****"."

             -Elwood Blues

 

tarna's dead; processing... complete. Disappointed by Universe. RIP Hades/Sand/etc. Here's hoping your next alt has a harp.

Posted (edited)

Why naive? He had nothing to lose at this point, so why should he lie? It's not like some election was coming up for him...

 

Geez, some people....

 

But it's okay. At least Otto did some important things in his life, unlike the British royality, who only does waving hands...

Edited by Morgoth
Posted

Gee, do people like to paint a generic picture of our Royalty because they don't have any of their own?

 

Fine, taking out the purely figurehead aspect of our Monarchy, the traditions behind it, the tourism and national image/identity..

What does that leave us with, oh, well, there's the international influence/diplomacy aspect we get from them. The way the government can use them for goodwill tours and such.. The way they happen to have lifelong training behind being a certain type of diplomat for the nation.. compared to so many who are just politicians there for a couple of terms of office.. You might not agree with it, but a lot of people still react a certain way when presented with a reigning monarch or their immediate family.

 

Then of course the assorted military service they're all expected to do.. and just because they're royalty doesn't stop them being put in harm's way while they serve.

 

On a more personal level, Charles for onedoes an awful lot of charity work, and puts large chunks of his personal fortune behind those he believes in..

Duty, responsibility, sure those might be dirty words to a lot of people these days but a lot of the royal family put serious consideration into them.

"Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum."

Posted

Touchy. The military service bit was amusing. :)

Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...