Syraxis Posted February 10, 2010 Posted February 10, 2010 DO NOT WANT. Did I scare you? MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!
Aram Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) Aram has not given his opinion on the new guns that have been revealed. This makes me cry. You just find it amusing to watch me talk to myself about guns like a raving lunatic, don't you? Edited February 11, 2010 by Aram
Slowtrain Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Remakes are the Devil. It depends how much dumbification the remake is (would be) subjected to. Notice how I can belittle your beliefs without calling you names. It's a useful skill to have particularly where you aren't allowed to call people names. It's a mistake to get too drawn in/worked up. I mean it's not life or death, it's just two guys posting their thoughts on a message board. If it were personal or face to face all the usual restraints would be in place, and we would never have reached this place in the first place. Try to remember that.
Syraxis Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) Remakes are the Devil. It depends how much dumbification the remake is (would be) subjected to. How about like I said before: Van Buren style: fully 3D (think Troika's , 360 Edited February 11, 2010 by Syraxis
Slowtrain Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Remakes are the Devil. It depends how much dumbification the remake is (would be) subjected to. How about like I said before: Van Buren style: fully 3D (think Troika's , 360 Notice how I can belittle your beliefs without calling you names. It's a useful skill to have particularly where you aren't allowed to call people names. It's a mistake to get too drawn in/worked up. I mean it's not life or death, it's just two guys posting their thoughts on a message board. If it were personal or face to face all the usual restraints would be in place, and we would never have reached this place in the first place. Try to remember that.
Purkake Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Remakes are the Devil. It depends how much dumbification the remake is (would be) subjected to. Yes, I really want to play the same game for the 4232th time. No thanks, new story or bust.
Gorgon Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Turn based is dead though. There will never be made another by a major developer. Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
Syraxis Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) Turn based is dead though. There will never be made another by a major developer. Probably, but who knows? Never say never I guess. Edited February 11, 2010 by Syraxis
bhlaab Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) Fallout 1 is fine the way it is, Fallout 2 has its problems but if you go through changing everything at some point it stops being a remake. They both still work and they're $5. And both are owned by Interplay as of now anyway. I don't see why turn based isometric Fallout can't at least coexist with the FPS ones, though. Turn based is dead though. There will never be made another by a major developer. Turn based is not "outdated" nor was it made obsolete by real-time combat. It's only as "dead" as people percieve it to be. There was a time when sidescrolling was considered "dead", now not only do we have Megaman 9, Sonic the Hedgehog 4, but we also have things like Braid. Edited February 11, 2010 by bhlaab
Slowtrain Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Remakes are the Devil. It depends how much dumbification the remake is (would be) subjected to. Yes, I really want to play the same game for the 4232th time. No thanks, new story or bust. lol. wut? This is video gaming, THE INDUSTRY. Everything is redone, remade or just kicked out for the umpteenth time. Notice how I can belittle your beliefs without calling you names. It's a useful skill to have particularly where you aren't allowed to call people names. It's a mistake to get too drawn in/worked up. I mean it's not life or death, it's just two guys posting their thoughts on a message board. If it were personal or face to face all the usual restraints would be in place, and we would never have reached this place in the first place. Try to remember that.
Slowtrain Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Turn based is dead though. There will never be made another by a major developer. Everything that is old is new again. Seriously, people have been playing games that consist of taking turns for many thousands of years. It's not about to be killed off the cpu. Notice how I can belittle your beliefs without calling you names. It's a useful skill to have particularly where you aren't allowed to call people names. It's a mistake to get too drawn in/worked up. I mean it's not life or death, it's just two guys posting their thoughts on a message board. If it were personal or face to face all the usual restraints would be in place, and we would never have reached this place in the first place. Try to remember that.
I want teh kotor 3 Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Turn based is dead though. There will never be made another by a major developer. In 7th grade, I teach the students how Chuck Norris took down the Roman Empire, so it is good that you are starting early on this curriculum. R.I.P. KOTOR 2003-2008 KILLED BY THOSE GREEDY MONEY-HOARDING ************* AND THEIR *****-*** MMOS
Purkake Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Remakes are the Devil. It depends how much dumbification the remake is (would be) subjected to. Yes, I really want to play the same game for the 4232th time. No thanks, new story or bust. lol. wut? This is video gaming, THE INDUSTRY. Everything is redone, remade or just kicked out for the umpteenth time. So you want a Fallout 1/2 remake because everyone else is doing that? That's a pretty sad reason. I'd rather have Obsidian try something new.
Gorgon Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Turn based is dead though. There will never be made another by a major developer. Well allright that's one. One. Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
Mikhailian Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Turn based is dead though. There will never be made another by a major developer. Well allright that's one. One. That "One" is pretty big. Like Japanese Hasselhoff big. But for all of us, there will come a point where it does matter, and it's gonna be like having a miniature suit-head shoving sticks up your butt all the time. - Tigranes
bhlaab Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) I guess it's still allowed in Japa- Edited February 11, 2010 by bhlaab
Oner Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 (edited) Remakes are the Devil.PoP: Sands of Time How about like I said before: Van Buren style: fully 3D (think Troika's , 360 Edited February 11, 2010 by Oner Giveaway list: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DgyQFpOJvyNASt8A12ipyV_iwpLXg_yltGG5mffvSwo/edit?usp=sharing What is glass but tortured sand?Never forget! '12.01.13.
Gorgon Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Alright, that's another five. Five. Na na na na na na ... greg358 from Darksouls 3 PVP is a CHEATER. That is all.
Oner Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 HoM&M, Disciples. Giveaway list: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DgyQFpOJvyNASt8A12ipyV_iwpLXg_yltGG5mffvSwo/edit?usp=sharing What is glass but tortured sand?Never forget! '12.01.13.
Purkake Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Remakes are the Devil.PoP: Sands of Time First of all that was a reimagining, not a straight remake. Secondly, it was a good game that happened to be a reimagining, I'm sure they could have made an awesome PoP game without restarting the series.
Slowtrain Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Remakes are the Devil. It depends how much dumbification the remake is (would be) subjected to. Yes, I really want to play the same game for the 4232th time. No thanks, new story or bust. lol. wut? This is video gaming, THE INDUSTRY. Everything is redone, remade or just kicked out for the umpteenth time. So you want a Fallout 1/2 remake because everyone else is doing that? That's a pretty sad reason. I'd rather have Obsidian try something new. I don't neccessarily WANT a Fallout remake or an XCOM remake or a Jag 2 remake. I was only remarking that if it were not highly dumbified a remake could be fine, ie NOT the devil. I think simply claiming that remakes are the devil is a pretty sad reason for not wanting a remake. Actually it's not eally a reasomn at all. Notice how I can belittle your beliefs without calling you names. It's a useful skill to have particularly where you aren't allowed to call people names. It's a mistake to get too drawn in/worked up. I mean it's not life or death, it's just two guys posting their thoughts on a message board. If it were personal or face to face all the usual restraints would be in place, and we would never have reached this place in the first place. Try to remember that.
Malcador Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 Eh, any remake would have to be dumbified and made 'cool', so they might as well be the devil. Why has elegance found so little following? Elegance has the disadvantage that hard work is needed to achieve it and a good education to appreciate it. - Edsger Wybe Dijkstra
HoonDing Posted February 11, 2010 Posted February 11, 2010 I can think of two good remakes: Prince of Persia Classic & Tomb Raider Anniversary. They were good because they tried to stick to the originals as close as possible. The ending of the words is ALMSIVI.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now