Magister Lajciak Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 I am not so familiar with the graphics cards territory, so I would welcome your opinions. 1) What do you think is the best graphics card at present and what features mark it as such? a) For desktops b) For notebooks 2) What is the best graphics card that is currently on the roadmap for the future and what features mark it as such? a) For desktops b) For notebooks Note: By 'best' mean the most powerful, not necessarily the greatest value for money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xard Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 (edited) At the moment? Nvidia's 8800 GTX is best without comparison, but it isn't exactly cheap Edited December 10, 2007 by Xard How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them. - OverPowered Godzilla (OPG) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkreku Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 The best card for desktop computers right now is the Geforce 8800 Ultra. Only because it's the fastest. It's also a giant hole to pour money into. It's not really worth what it costs when compared to (for example) the 8800 GT or the ATI Radeon 3870. The best card for notebooks should be the 8800M GTX. I haven't read up on it, but it's bound to be extremely fast (and power hungry). Noone knows that the future will bring, but judging from this current generation, chances are that the 9800 (bound to arrive this February) will rock ATI's socks. I'm hoping ATI will make a huge comeback by then (as they are releasing their unnamed high-end part at the same time) as Nvidia needs competition to perform. I mean, the 8800 Ultra (which is just an overclocked 8800 GTX) is a year old by now! Without competition they just don't care. Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magister Lajciak Posted December 10, 2007 Author Share Posted December 10, 2007 I see. But what is it that makes the 8800 faster than the competition? Is it a high memory, or a fast processor clock, or something else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bokishi Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 Unified shaderz Current 3DMark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samm Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 (edited) ...which the others don't have? (gf 8xxx series and ati hd series all have unified shader architecture, x1xxx from ATI already had that to some extent iirc, though not dx 10 compliant.) It's faster than its competitors because it has a rather efficient architecture combined with high clock- and memoryspeeds. It's faster than the 8800 GTX only because of increased clock speeds for memory and gpu, but is unproportionally more expensive. There's a GF8800M GTX, too, which is the fastest available notebook gpu and a bit slower than the old version of the 8800 GTS. I think it's not too clever to call these "best" graphics cards, though. Who wants a notebook that runs for an hour or so, just to be able to play the newest 1337 crysis? Or spend substantially more money on a 8800 ultra when it's marginally faster than a GTX? Well... The OP clarified his initial posting, but it's certainly not my definition of "best" *shrug* Edited December 10, 2007 by samm Citizen of a country with a racist, hypocritical majority Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveThaiBinh Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 I get very confused comparing high-end graphics cards nowadays, because you have to keep the various SLI (and whatever ATI's equivalent is) options in mind. That said, is it ever the case that two lower-priced cards SLId together will outperform a single higher-priced card? Noone knows that the future will bring, but judging from this current generation, chances are that the 9800 (bound to arrive this February) will rock ATI's socks. I'm hoping ATI will make a huge comeback by then (as they are releasing their unnamed high-end part at the same time) as Nvidia needs competition to perform. I mean, the 8800 Ultra (which is just an overclocked 8800 GTX) is a year old by now! Without competition they just don't care. Ooh, is ATI lagging behind then? I thought they were level-pegging in all things. An nVidia monopoly would not be a good development, certainly... "An electric puddle is not what I need right now." (Nina Kalenkov) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samm Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 (edited) Yes, ATI doesn't really compete at the high end graphics cards right now. The new HD 3xxx series is priced lower than the 8800GT, fitting exactly to their speed (though the slower model, the 3850, offers especially good speed for the money). They also draw less current than nVidias similar offerings, unlike the monster that is HD2900 Pro / XT. I think I read - but don't find the source right now - that two 8800 GTs (512 MB) in SLI, probably two 3870 in Crossfire too, outperform an 8800 Ultra while being less expensive. Edited December 10, 2007 by samm Citizen of a country with a racist, hypocritical majority Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deraldin Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 Yes, ATI doesn't really compete at the high end graphics cards right now. The new HD 3xxx series is priced lower than the 8800GT, fitting exactly to their speed (though the slower model, the 3850, offers especially good speed for the money). They also draw less current than nVidias similar offerings, unlike the monster that is HD2900 Pro / XT. I think I read - but don't find the source right now - that two 8800 GTs (512 MB) in SLI, probably two 3870 in Crossfire too, outperform an 8800 Ultra while being less expensive. I dunno if the 3870's will beat an Ultra, but I know that 2 3850's will outperform an 8800GTX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WITHTEETH Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 Im waiting for the 9xxx series graphic cards. When the heck is Duke Nukem Fornever coming out anyway?! hmmph! Im not to impressed with the 8xxx series Geforce when compared to the current crop of game engines out. These games really kick the crap out of the 8xxx series. Always outnumbered, never out gunned! Unreal Tournament 2004 Handle:Enlight_2.0 Myspace Website! My rig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidesco Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 The only game that gives current cards trouble is Crysis. Unless you want to play all games at ridiculous resolutions of course. "My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian touristI am Dan Quayle of the Romans.I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.Heja Sverige!!Everyone should cuffawkle more.The wrench is your friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bokishi Posted December 10, 2007 Share Posted December 10, 2007 Pidesco is right, only Crysis is kicking the crap out of the 8xxx series. Every other game runs flawless Current 3DMark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WITHTEETH Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 The only game that gives current cards trouble is Crysis. Unless you want to play all games at ridiculous resolutions of course. I want to play at really high, not ridiculous settings! its only a couple months away, till the the gen cards come out. I do not have a 8series card so maybe i went out of line, but my 7series blows when it comes to LOW settings for unreal3 at resolution 800*600. So Ill save up for the uber 9series graphic card so I can kick boks ass in Unreal3. Bok my handle is still Enlight_2.0 if you want to play Unreal 2K4 Tourny! Always outnumbered, never out gunned! Unreal Tournament 2004 Handle:Enlight_2.0 Myspace Website! My rig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magister Lajciak Posted December 14, 2007 Author Share Posted December 14, 2007 What does SLI actually stand for? I recall that it has something to do with being able to utilize several graphics cards simultaneously, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pidesco Posted December 14, 2007 Share Posted December 14, 2007 The only game that gives current cards trouble is Crysis. Unless you want to play all games at ridiculous resolutions of course. I want to play at really high, not ridiculous settings! its only a couple months away, till the the gen cards come out. I do not have a 8series card so maybe i went out of line, but my 7series blows when it comes to LOW settings for unreal3 at resolution 800*600. So Ill save up for the uber 9series graphic card so I can kick boks ass in Unreal3. Bok my handle is still Enlight_2.0 if you want to play Unreal 2K4 Tourny! Which card is that, exactly? My 7600GT works pretty well with UT3 @Magister: SLI "My hovercraft is full of eels!" - Hungarian touristI am Dan Quayle of the Romans.I want to tattoo a map of the Netherlands on my nether lands.Heja Sverige!!Everyone should cuffawkle more.The wrench is your friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magister Lajciak Posted December 14, 2007 Author Share Posted December 14, 2007 The only game that gives current cards trouble is Crysis. Unless you want to play all games at ridiculous resolutions of course. I want to play at really high, not ridiculous settings! its only a couple months away, till the the gen cards come out. I do not have a 8series card so maybe i went out of line, but my 7series blows when it comes to LOW settings for unreal3 at resolution 800*600. So Ill save up for the uber 9series graphic card so I can kick boks ass in Unreal3. Bok my handle is still Enlight_2.0 if you want to play Unreal 2K4 Tourny! Which card is that, exactly? My 7600GT works pretty well with UT3 @Magister: SLI That explains it. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bokishi Posted December 17, 2007 Share Posted December 17, 2007 MMMM 9-Series Current 3DMark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magister Lajciak Posted December 18, 2007 Author Share Posted December 18, 2007 What technical parameters are best used to assess the power of a graphics card? I know about VRAM, clockspeed and vertex processors/shaders - what else is important? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkreku Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 How fast the GPU can communicate with the RAM, the memory interface. It's usually measured in some amount of bits. <128 bit is bad. 256> bit is good. Something like that. Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bokishi Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 8800 GTX is 384-bit, it think it's good Current 3DMark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Raven Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 8800 GTX is 384-bit, it think it's good No. 768MB. Hades was the life of the party. RIP You'll be missed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angshuman Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 To get a rough idea about the performance of a video card, you can look at some easy-to-calculate metrics such as pixel, texel, and vertex fill rates. These metrics are becoming less and less indicative of the actual in-game performance of modern GPUs with highly programmable shaders, but are still your best bet short of looking at actual benchmark scores. Fill rates can be calculated from the published specifications of graphics cards. http://www.gpureview.com/ has a pretty extensive and accurate database of GPUs with fillrate numbers, but the numbers for some of the modern cores with their unified scalar shaders are not comparable to older GPUs (apples-oranges). If you really don't even want to get into fillrates, but want a single number (based on specs, not benchmark runs) to compare and get an instant idea, then based on the way GPUs and games have evolved in the past few years, I'd say you want to look at one metric: Memory Bandwidth. Simply multiply the bit-width of the memory bus (e.g., 384-bits for the 8800GTX) with the memory clock (e.g., 1800MHz for the GTX) and you'll have a pretty good idea of the market bracket the card falls into. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bokishi Posted December 19, 2007 Share Posted December 19, 2007 8800 GTX is 384-bit, i think it's good No. 768MB. if ur trying to impress me with your grafix knowledge then u better try a little harder Current 3DMark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkreku Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 If you really don't even want to get into fillrates, but want a single number (based on specs, not benchmark runs) to compare and get an instant idea, then based on the way GPUs and games have evolved in the past few years, I'd say you want to look at one metric: Memory Bandwidth. Simply multiply the bit-width of the memory bus (e.g., 384-bits for the 8800GTX) with the memory clock (e.g., 1800MHz for the GTX) and you'll have a pretty good idea of the market bracket the card falls into. The disappointment that was the ATI Radeon 2900XT has a 512 bit interface and the memory is clocked at 1.65GHz. It's bandwidth beats that of the 8800GTX. On paper that GPU should have been a beast. I still don't understand what holds it back.. Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Raven Posted December 20, 2007 Share Posted December 20, 2007 8800 GTX is 384-bit, i think it's good No. 768MB. if ur trying to impress me with your grafix knowledge then u better try a little harder A nerd like you should be going for the 768MB GeForce 8800 Ultra. Thats the uber graphics card. Hades was the life of the party. RIP You'll be missed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now