Sand Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 (edited) ATARI ANNOUNCES NEVERWINTER NIGHTS Edited April 12, 2007 by Sand Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
kirottu Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 Aww, poor Hades. This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Sand Posted April 12, 2007 Author Posted April 12, 2007 (edited) Well, come on. Epic rules simply diablo-izes DnD. At least we will have a completed story-line. That would be a nice change from Obsidian. Edited April 12, 2007 by Sand Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
Xard Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 (edited) Epic rules do suck, but I can live with it As a whole this sounds awesome Edited April 12, 2007 by Xard How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them. - OverPowered Godzilla (OPG)
kirottu Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 Well, come on. Epic rules simply diablo-izes DnD. At least we will have a completed story-line. That would be a nice change from Obsidian. Aww, poor Hades. This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
Sand Posted April 12, 2007 Author Posted April 12, 2007 (edited) I agree, Xard. I just hope that putting epic rules in the first expansion doesn't mean there won't be a second. I would like to see this game get as many as NWN 1 got if not more. Kirottu, are you actually going to contribute to the discussion or just spam? Edited April 12, 2007 by Sand Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
Xard Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 I wonder what these are How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them. - OverPowered Godzilla (OPG)
Sand Posted April 12, 2007 Author Posted April 12, 2007 Bringing the Wyverns and Owlbears would be very nice. Also the full range of dragons as well. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
kirottu Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 Kirottu, are you actually going to contribute to the discussion or just spam? Actually, I thought doing what you always do. You know, you always respong same way to certain things and you always feel the need to actually repond to it. I This post is not to be enjoyed, discussed, or referenced on company time.
SteveThaiBinh Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 I don't mind epic levels at all. I would have been equally happy had the NWN2 campaign been reconfigured to end at level 14 ready for the expansion pack, but it doesn't matter all that much to me. What matters is that there will be an expansion, and the story will be continued, and hopefully some of the same NPCs will make a reappearance. What's in Rashemen, and why does it sound familiar? "An electric puddle is not what I need right now." (Nina Kalenkov)
Sand Posted April 12, 2007 Author Posted April 12, 2007 (edited) It is where Minsc and Boo are from. I also agree that the retooling of the official campaign to level 14 with the expansion would be a better way of doing it. They could then bring epic levels in the second expansion. Oh well. I will be getting the expansion when it comes out. Edited April 12, 2007 by Sand Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
SteveThaiBinh Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 It is where Minsc and Boo are from. I knew I'd heard it somewhere. Boo cameo! "An electric puddle is not what I need right now." (Nina Kalenkov)
Sand Posted April 12, 2007 Author Posted April 12, 2007 There needs to be an opening movie sequence where Boo battles Szass Tam. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
Xard Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 I guess this expansios uses ending where you didn't join with King of Shadows How can it be a no ob build. It has PROVEN effective. I dare you to show your builds and I will tear you apart in an arugment about how these builds will won them. - OverPowered Godzilla (OPG)
Sand Posted April 12, 2007 Author Posted April 12, 2007 Maybe, maybe not. We can only guess what the opening sequence might be. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
Sand Posted April 12, 2007 Author Posted April 12, 2007 Where is it quoted from by the way? Here: http://nwn2forums.bioware.com/forums/viewt...2&forum=109 I noticed it when I was looking up information about patch 1.05. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
Zoma Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 (edited) Dankee Meh, Epic levels ::Sighs:: Got to live with it I guess. Hopefully the engine's much more optimized by then as well as improving the rest system which I find affects the balance of the game. Edited April 12, 2007 by Zoma
mkreku Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 I'm hoping they'll somehow redo the multiplayer so that when you're playing co-op, you're not joined by the hip like some freaky Siamese twins. Swedes, go to: Spel2, for the latest game reviews in swedish!
Sand Posted April 12, 2007 Author Posted April 12, 2007 That is only if you are in the same party. Don't be in the same party when you are MPing. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
Dragon Lord Jones Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 great news ---- can we have no forced npcs, and a little less linear. we're not gonna wake up in a cell and stripped of all our equipment , because I believe I've played that game before lol
Sand Posted April 12, 2007 Author Posted April 12, 2007 That includes inn rooms to. No cells, inn rooms, and no adventuring naked unless the character was naked to begin with. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
Diamond Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 EBGames changed the title in their preorder page. Seems like a case of miscommunication.
Sand Posted April 12, 2007 Author Posted April 12, 2007 Of course it was. Murphy's Law of Computer Gaming: The listed minimum specifications written on the box by the publisher are not the minimum specifications of the game set by the developer. @\NightandtheShape/@ - "Because you're a bizzare strange deranged human?" Walsingham- "Sand - always rushing around, stirring up apathy." Joseph Bulock - "Another headache, courtesy of Sand"
Volourn Posted April 12, 2007 Posted April 12, 2007 Coolbeans. More new 'base classes'? Why, oh, why? New base classes ar elame. Everything else sounds cool. DWARVES IN PROJECT ETERNITY = VOLOURN HAS PLEDGED $250.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now